Has linux ever been hit by a wannacry-level ransomware?

>>60544053
back in the 80s

Linux by it's nature is a very insecure os, op.

>>60544320
Not OP but why does Win/Mac get hit with so much stuff in that case? I have never heard of Unix getting BTFO

>>60544335
>Mac not a UNIX
>Linux is a UNIX
kys

>>60544335
>UNIX

File: 1494653436872.jpg (112KB, 642x473px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 642x473px

>>60544335
>unix
>not apple

File: 92a6820c83a3e70f582ee4365ea56467_400x400.jpg (29KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x400px

>>60544335
>unix

File: 23423432.png (48KB, 187x138px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 187x138px

>>60544335
Welcome to /g/

>>60544335
Because Windows and Mac are the two most popular platforms for desktop. Why would you make ransomware for Linux when it has like 1-2% at most?

>>60544317
>back in the 80s
>linux is from 1991

>>60544053
>https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1060828-postdays-0-postorder-asc-start-0.html
Yes.

>>60544729
Linux users have higher income

>>60544729
What is a server?

>>60544053
no because there is no money to be made

File: ColonCaretClosingparenthese.gif (1MB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x500px

>>60544783
Still reading it but:
FIREFOX AS ROOT!?
WTF!?

>>60544793
>

>>60544783
There's no way someone can successfully install gentoo and still run firefox as root
This has to be a troll

>>60544335
Mac is certified unix, linux is not.

>>60544053
Yes. And things that were a lot worse.

>>60545019
>Yes.
no
>And things that were a lot worse.
yes

>>60544815
Are you implying that targetting servers would yield a higher ROI? There are fewer servers than desktops, and desktop users tend to be less tech-savvy. Why the fuck would you target servers?

>>60546028
>desktop users tend to be less tech-savvy.
Wasn't it recently that all those mongodb servers got hi-jacked just because the default password wasn't changed?