>AMD >cheap

File: ugh.jpg (55KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 540x960px

why does everyone compare them to the 4c/8t chip when they're made to compete vs the 8c/16t and 10c/20t chips intel sells for 2x/3x the price lol

>>60533475
>Comparing 4c to 8c processor
Is dis b8 ?

>F-fuck Intel, so fucking expensive for shit!
>B-based AMD competing with the big dawgs haha xdd

>>60533487
>muh GHz

File: baito.png (38KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 625x626px

>>60533475
This is some weak ass bait.

>4c8t processor from intel
>$330 US dollars
>4c8t processor from AMD
>$190 US dollars
any questions?

File: 1490407663166.jpg (39KB, 492x388px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 492x388px

>2017
>quad core is $350

u avin a giggle m8?

https://www.newegg.com/Product/ComboBundleDetails.aspx?ItemList=Combo.3516822

>>60533487
because amd compare the 1700/x to the 7700k?

>>60533860
in price:performance for gaming

they even admitted that it wasn't as good, but yet their initial goal was to shit on the 6900k and 6950x which it did

>>60533659
>ryzen 5
>pack-in Fayytalmao motherboard
What, are you poor or something?

>>60533487
So, what you are saying is AMD gave up the consumer CPU market 100% to Intel and they are focusing purely on workstation/server market?

>>60534633
R5 is a thing, you know. And soon also R3.

>>60534725
>R3
>Buying the moar cores processor but getting the one without moar cores.

>>60535280
at the price-point of competing with i3's, it still is the moarcoarz chip.

>>60533860
amd never compared ryzen to skylake nor kaby. all their press and demonstrations always compared it to broadwell-e.

only tomshardware and other so called pinnacles and wizards of smarts compared it to kaby.

>>60535280
>4c chip against 2c chip for the same price
It's still moar coarz, nerd. And assuming the same thing that happened with the R5/i5, it'll mop the floor with the i3. i5s are completely irrelevant right now. Intel's only winning points are the fucking Pentium G4560 and the i7 7700k for GAMES ONLY. Everywhere else, AMD is king of performance and price.

You'll have to deal with the truth eventually. AMD is actually beating the shit out of Intel in CPUs. And it's a good thing too, they might lift their fucking asses and pump out some actual good CPUs at competitive prices.

>op
>stupid

>>60534170
>AMD's not cheap!
>posts link showing it's cheap as shit
>What are you poor?
Nice giggle, m8.

>>60533475
Yeah, looks like AMD is cheap according to your picture

File: 1471434944301.jpg (32KB, 312x342px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 312x342px

>>60533475
now compare it to another 8c/16t intel cpu

File: 1493932977399.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>60533487
because it doesn't fit the (((narrative)))

>>60533475
>>For U$S 20 you get 4 cores and 8 threads more
>Somehow U$S 20 isn't a cheap price to pay for the sweet future-proofing

>>60533475
Tell me, shill, how much would I pay for an 8-core 3.2GHz Intel processor?

I'll stick with the 1700 at $300.

>>60536805
But Intel uses real cores.

>>60537018
>hurr

>>60537018
Retard detected.

>>60537018
Intel has no real cores, they stopped shipping real cores ages ago