Intel HD Graphics video rendering problem?

intel graphics are terrible

>budget reasons
Elaborate... I don't understand what would force you to drop it.

Should have bought an i7 with hd 630 graphics

Nvidia is probably doing some post processing in their hardware accelerated decodes.

>>60488527
I had i3-2100... i needed to change to LGA1155 and G4560 is cheaper

>>60488526
i play on consoles so i dont really need good graphics... and i didnt what to spend fortune on new hardware

https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/26772/

Update to latest Intel 21.20.16.4664 driver

>>60488524
i know... but i thought that video will be the same

>>60488625
That doesn't really explain why you had to drop it. Laptop?

>>60488628
>https://downloadcenter.intel.com/download/26772/
thing is... im on Win7 and im using some beta drivers from ASUS cuz i cant intall oficial divers... is that the problem?

>>60488665
no, i now just wait when GTX 1050 will be cheaper (Palit KalmX passive cooling version, same like my last card)

File: intel graphics.png (94KB, 500x522px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 500x522px

>>60488498
just buy a cheap gpu (2013 and up) to handle the videos should solve that problem

>>60488727
I bought cheapest mobo that supported Displayport so thought that i was futureproof for 4K... sep GPU was optional for me but i must be SILENT but that cost more

>>60488498
Install latest drivers i was able to watch 1080p 60fps videos with no problems when i did not had any GPU with my shitty HD 530

>>60488773
the MSI GTX 970 4G has a 0db function that doesn`t start the fans until the card reaches 60 degrees celsius. it should be able to handle 4k videos

>>60488968
i wouldnt recommend that card since the 3.5gb fiasco rather go for the Palit GTX 1050 Ti KalmX

>>60488773
whats your budget op?

>>60489002
about 100-120 dollars for now

>>60488992
i think i will do that if i cant fix this

>>60488813
cool but as i was saying im using 21.20.16.4508 cuz im on Win7... is it worth to jump to Win10 Spyfest?

>>60489059
gimme a sec

>>60489059
RX 460
Pairs well with the G4560, pcie power only, really good for high res video
If you don't mind going used and have a beefy power supply, look into an R9 290 or 780ti for around 100$

>>60489059
go for the rx 550 newer cheaper sips power, quiet or you could go for the fanless 1050 ti

>>60489354
>RX 460
i have only 400W supply but thx for suggestion :)

>>60488673
>Windows 7
Get with the times, grandpa.

File: 81Yj5yvjwHL._SL1200_.jpg (259KB, 1200x1200px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1200x1200px

Save 20 bucks more and get this one.

>>60489392
Don't confuse RX 460 with GTX 460.
RX 460 can be found without extra power.