CPU-Z Thread

File: cpuz.jpg (91KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 417x413px

e5649 on the way, that fucker will fly

File: aymdryzonlake.png (28KB, 405x407px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 405x407px

>>60483583
im better at life then you

File: Untitled.jpg (77KB, 406x406px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 406x406px

4.2 [email protected]
Energy efficiency all the way, bruh.

>>60484144
you paid 1k for a cpu that you run at 4,2ghz?

File: lul.png (30KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 403x402px

best i can do

>>60484509
eBay, for about half that, and sometimes I do bump it up. But usually I prefer better efficiency, as it's partially solar powered and I do a lot of long-running computations. At night, I lock it at the lowest multiplier (1.2 GHz) and it runs all six cores at full load for a whopping six watts of power usage. I wish I could put this thing in my laptop and just run it at low speeds...

File: cpuz_i52.jpg (58KB, 407x404px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 407x404px

>>60483583

File: cpuz.png (25KB, 417x414px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 417x414px

nothing special, and not the newest, but good enough for my use cases

File: newcpuz.png (48KB, 803x398px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 803x398px

>>60484669
ayyyy
>>60487909
turn it up s'more if you have the cooling.

Lower binned chip so it needs a little more vcore than a k at the same speeds. Usually run it 24/7 at 103.7 bclk 1.15-1.2v, all c states enabled.

shut down some background processes and got a nice round number
https://valid.x86.fr/964x80

File: unknown.png (40KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 403x402px

only had this shot to hand, i know its not max freq

>>60490418
>1.448V
>2718Mhz

What's going on here?

>>60484603
Should have bought a ryzen desu

>>60490534
amd cool'n'quiet™

>>60490806
??

>>60490534
>>60490903
cpuz false reporting

File: Screenshot 2017-05-19 22.06.10.png (47KB, 407x404px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 407x404px

Haven't dialed in the voltage from my OC yet, but I've got a good AIO loop so it's sitting stable at a comfy temperature.

File: CPU-Z.jpg (2MB, 2510x1677px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2510x1677px

>>60483583

>>60492228
you have 32GB of DDR4 memory and you don't have a graphics card?

nigga, what are you doing

>>60492261
It's on the way...

File: CPUZ.jpg (136KB, 606x605px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 606x605px

Ryzeennn

>>60492324
Is zen1 very voltage limited?

>>60492348
You can up the voltage to a rather crazy 1.45V, but temps start to get very problematic there, and at that voltage you can reach 4.1, *some* gold chips can hit 4.2. Generally 3.9 and 4.0 can be hit easily on air, 3.9 on a stock Spire cooler even.

>>60492348

I don't think so. What you are seeing in this thread is alot of false reporting. I got my R7 1700 a week after launch and people were reporting 3.8 @ 1.385 volts so I got it and just turned it to that. I noticed I could lower the voltage no problem but I figured I might as well just leave it as it was proving stable already.

I have seen people with way lower voltage hitting 3.9 and 4.0. I just don't feel like messing with it as it is already a great product and I am glad I made the purchase over the 7700k I was considering.

File: Capture.png (26KB, 404x399px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 404x399px

Personally pleased with Ryzen so far, coming from a 4670k.

File: screenshot.543.jpg (143KB, 402x400px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 402x400px

Gonna be changing to a 1700x

File: CPU.png (65KB, 804x401px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 804x401px

>>60492881
I'm still waiting for something meaningful to upgrade to.
A few extra cores just doesn't do it for me. Haswell still does everything I need it to do.

>>60492348
process (14nm finfet) limited tbqh. this is pretty much evident by ryzen being maxed out at 4.1ghz regardless how much voltage you pump into it. even then 4.1ghz, let alone 4ghz, is hard to achieve. similar to polaris. polaris refresh showed how polaris first generation was processed limited with amd only changing to a more mature 14nm process allowed them to raise the clocks by ~200mhz without altering voltages nor modifying polaris itself. my sapphire nitro+ limited edition runs at 1450mhz with the same voltage my sapphire nitro+ 480 needed for 1306mhz.

File: cpuzryzench6.jpg (356KB, 834x419px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 834x419px

>>60492426
no, its not. zen will run up to 1.5v's on auto settings with performance boost and xfr (if your sku has it) enabled. but only for short bursts to maintain boost speeds. so on two cores, as long as usage stays below ~10% it will run at your boost speed using between 1.4 - 1.5v's for a short awhile. if you do something that constantly loads a small, 5% load for example, repeatedly, such as a program putting a 5% load and removing after a second on no more than two threads, only to redo it a few seconds later, you will get a constant load of 1.4-1.5v's since your processor is quickly changing between stock and boost speed. but once you tax the cores, such as putting on a 15-20% load , regardless how many threads are being used, and keeping it there, the voltages will drop to 1.2X - 1.3Xv range.

at idle voltage, idle meaning no load, will drop down to the 0.Xv range.

tldr, on average if you record voltage usage with something like hwinfo, you will see ryzen averaging around 0.8v's idle, leaving the screen off. 1.1-1.2v's, is using the machine lightly like firefox, music, and movies. 1.2-1.3v's if doing something moderate and above. like abusive stress test, gaming, rendering, compiling, streaming, and such.

>>60490534
CPU-Z reporting false voltages
Newest version should fix it

File: Capture.png (63KB, 478x802px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 478x802px

>>60494319
pic related to show.

File: Capture.png (153KB, 953x1004px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 953x1004px

>>60494406

>>60492228
>3000mhz ram running at jdec 2133 because you din turn xmp on.
>32 niggabytes

What should I put loadline calibration at on my AX370 gaming 5?
Currently left it on auto
Running at 3.3Ghz @ 1V

>>60496128
0 most likely. I don't have ryzen but I'm experienced with oc. set manual voltage, all c-states etc off. and stress the cpu. if vcore is lower then specified, increase llc. if it's higher, decrease llc. a slight vdroop or overshoot is fine. If vdroop make sure there is no whea errors. If overshoot make sure it doesn't spike over max safe voltage. (not a problem at 1v)

File: 69C full load.jpg (201KB, 485x507px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 485x507px

I should really just buy a new CPU and mobo.

>>60496810
Whats a good tool to monitor the voltage?

File: 45.png (26KB, 388x345px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 388x345px

I was contemplating if it's worth the risk to take pic related to 1.65v or higher.
Keep in mind I have a $5 nobrand psu, though it didn't explode yet.

>>60496810
CPU-Z reports 0.984V with some spikes to 0.996V

>>60497023
I use hwinfo. tray icons, graphs and osd.

>>60497217
No Core unlocker?

>>60497822
Mobo incompatible. It's GA-970A-UD3.
I went to great lengths trying to make it work - it won't.

>>60492999
>3.7GHz
>0.144V
k

File: cpuz.png (49KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 417x413px

This is the lowest voltage I could get on this OC. It should be fine if the machine isn't on 24/7 right?

>>60499441
Impossible to tell just by looking at numbers. Each chip is different, and applying general rules wouldn't answer your question.

Torture it with prime95, see how often it crashes and whether you're fine with that frequency.
And decide for yourself if it's "fine if the machine isn't on 24/7".

File: Capture1.png (17KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 403x402px

i really don't get how cpu-z has such a low reference score for the 1800x at supposed stock settings. i have my 1800x 100% at stock settings. whole reason why i bought an 1800x was because i didn't want to overclock. 1800x boosts very high and comes stock with a high frequency. yet i score much higher than what cpu-z has as an reference.

File: dicks.png (21KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 806x402px

ok i call horseshit on cpu-z. a 7600k has stronger single threaded than a 6700k???? that makes zero sense. both single threaded turbo boost IS 4.2ghz on both the 6700k and 7600k. reviews after reviews showed CLOCK for CLOCK skylake and kaby are 100% identical. not a single damn difference. there were extensive reviews that solely focused on clock for clock to prove this. and that multi-threaded.... that's way to close for comfort. the 6700k should be way higher in multi compared to the 7600k.

after cpu-z "fixed" its benchmark because "amd" now all of a sudden kaby lake is so much faster than skylake as well? kaby was nothing more than a skylake refresh with a new chipset for "muh optane!!""

File: ayyyyyyyyymd1700.png (19KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 403x402px

Literally worse than everything I have seen online and I am pretty sure it is not even fully stable. Still using the stock cooler though, I hope I will be able to hit at least 3.85Ghz once I get a better cooler.

File: Clipboard.png (47KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 806x402px

Bought this housefire from china for $37 shipped.

Runs BF4 nicely so fast enough for me.

>>60492138
Hey anon, I'm checking to compare how well my previous CPU will do against a 4.0Ghz Ryzen on single-threaded performance. Could you be a gent and show me the CPU-Z bench score?

Also, what RAM speed are you running?

>>60492752
Have you tried overclocking your 1600X?

>>60497217

Had really bad luck with my x3.

Could not overclock it at all and 4th core when unlocked was unusable, would crash in games all the time.

File: Screenshot_3.png (27KB, 403x401px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 403x401px

Is it time to upgrade?

>>60483583

>All of these Windows users
Boy this place sure has fallen since I left for eight chan.

File: 2600K.png (32KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 403x402px

Not even remotely tempted to upgrade at the moment. Maybe next year with Zen+ if they can get the clocks up a bit.

>>60499809
Now you know why Intel was fined for illicit business practices.

What memory speed are you running by the way?

>>60499809
>i really don't get how cpu-z has such a low reference score for the 1800x at supposed stock settings
|
|>
|
|3
|
|

File: 80ccf987c9.png (87KB, 838x413px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 838x413px

>>60483583
Not too bad for a close-to-9 year old platform

>>60500903
Why is that nose's ballsack sticking out?

>>60499958
CPU-Z is shitting the bed really badly as of late. Both Intel and AMD scores are fucky.

>>60499958
Kabylake officially supports 2400mhz and Skylake officially supports 2133. They might not be using the same memory for testing.

File: abstract jew.png (3KB, 356x480px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 356x480px

>>60500903

>>60484603
Its a shame really that laptops have so fucking few options in the bios.. Atleast let us underclock and undervolt the damn cpu's.

There where some laptops that actually came in full socket 1366 and 2011, but they're probably very rare to come by and pretty expensive.

File: bill-pullman-id42.jpg (53KB, 656x343px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 656x343px

>>60500921
Not bad, anon. Not bad at all.

What mobo/cooling you got? And what ram speed?

>>60501435
Try using Intel Extreme Tuning Utility.With it I got my i5-6300HQ from around 1.0V to 0.875V.

File: ryzen.png (26KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 403x402px

>>60491999
>>60492138
>>60492324
>>60492752
>>60494370

File: cpuz.png (30KB, 403x401px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 403x401px

ayyy

>>60500737
Honestly you're good familia

>>60501613
Mobo is an Intel DX58SO, has only 4 ram slots, not many oc options, but is damn reliable
Memory's running at 205*8 =1640mhz, 12GB in 3 4gb sticks
Cooling is done by a Reeven Justice

File: cap.png (30KB, 404x401px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 404x401px

This is the best I could do

>>60502847
Its on fucking AIR? Damn, thats very impressive!

Think thats the best air cooled 1366 system I've seen if thats fully stable..

>>60500691
Not yet, i plan on it though.

>>60492138
Have you tried p-state overclocking? I have my 1800x @ 4.05ghz @1.37, plus the standard low voltage idle. It idles at 27c, load only goes up to about 66c. It was a wierdass decision to lock volts and clocks the moment you monkey with anything, I'm glad they added pstate as an olive branch.

>>60504639
I've personally tested this thing to 4.5GHz stable on a mere 212 Evo as well albeit at housefirs-tire 94c range
It's still hot but usable at 4.3GHz on the Justice at the high 70s/low 80s, and 4.6GHz is probably possible if i get bored
The thing with Westmere/Nehalem is the sheer amount of heat and power they use, and I often shift my OCs from 4.0-4.4 depending on what I need simply since my room can get so hot by a 200w+ heat source

File: 2017-05-21-002342_484x407_scrot.png (14KB, 484x407px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 484x407px

my computer will be 10 years old in december. I'm thinking of building a new computer with one of the cheaper Ryzens

Anybody still on Phenom II? I'm running the X6 1090t, no CPU-Z because I use debian. 6 C/T, mild OC to 3.4-3.6ghz, sort of a housefire.

>>60485890
1.2V on idle. Kek

>>60501183
2133 to 2400 should not change the results that much. maybe an extra 10-15 points at MOST. something is odd since all generations prior to kaby look like shit.

>>60500803
2933 cas 14

>>60506828
My dark skinned male.

You're the one with the P6T-SE flashed to a WS or something? If so we talked a few weeks ago :3

Getting a e5649 soon, hoping it will kick as much ass as the x56XX cpu's, got a Rampage 3 Extreme from a friend with fullcover water.

So much fucking fun overclocking on 1366.. And the power... THE POWER.

>>60507123
>You're the one with the P6T-SE flashed to a WS or something? If so we talked a few weeks ago :3

Indeed, I am.

I don't think I'll upgrade anytime soon because I just don't need more power than for playing CS:GO.

Finally getting a laptop though, a shitty i3-2370M/7670M/1366x768 machine hand me down from dad, but when I upgrade to a i7-2630QM and 8GB of RAM it should serve me well while on vacation.

File: cpuz.png (31KB, 414x415px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 414x415px

>>60487909

>>60490534
one core could be boosting in the background while the core cpu is showing for frequency isn't.

>>60507167
I can't really imagine needing more that a 1366 hexa either for fucking years, it'll be a long time before 6c12t of that singlethread performance is too weak for games and normal programs.

Of course I can see people doing lots of enconing and image processing for a living needing better tho.

Be aware that unless its a higher end/buisness laptop, the cooling solution and power supply may strugle with an i7 from a i3..
I got a acer 15.6" back in 2010 with a 1.gen i3 and threw a i7 720 in there and holy fuck did that thing get hot!
It smelled warm plastic everytime I did something tasking on it :P

Eventually sold the i7 and went back to the i3 without any performance hit I could notice, as when I'm traveling I pretty much only use it for 4chan and email + some youtube.

One thing I found worth doing tho, was changing out that shitty fucking high gloss bullshit display thats useless unless you sit in absolute darkness. Fuck that shit, matty is heaven compared.

File: 2600k.jpg (83KB, 398x403px) Image search: [Google]

83KB, 398x403px

Still no reason to upgrade

>>60507190
Ryzen doesn't show the frequency intervals?

>>60507410
Well the same model had i7 configs so I hope it'll be able to cool it well enough. The display's thankfully already matte.

>>60505960
Still on an X4 940. It started stuttering randomly after a BIOS update recently. Will probably upgrade to the G4560. Shame really, love this CPU.

File: alright.png (34KB, 411x414px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 411x414px

4.6ghz @1.33

P sure it could be done @ at least 1.3

File: 7700k.jpg (59KB, 405x380px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 405x380px

How'd I do /g? Got it used for $270 from bhphotovidya, haven't tried OCing yet cause it's already fast enough for me. Temps reach 62c max while stress testing so I think the previous owner might have delidded it or something.

Surprised how cool and quiet it is since all I've been reading recently is how bad the 7700k IHS TIM is. Hope I can hit the 5ghz epeener if I need it later down the line.

>>60508303
It's a way to get a cheap 7700K, not bad. But I would still get an R5 1600 or 1600X at that price.

>>60506828
What do you use to cool this shit? I'm >>60500921 and want to know more since I want to get the absolute most out of my own Xeon

>>60508303
You'll be able to hit it if you get an NH-D15.

>>60499809
>>60500803
>>60500903
Reference speeds are from Day 1
It's not some sort of massive jewish conspiracy

People have been pushing to get them changed but CPU-Z devs are saying maybe but it's fucking retarded to update scores over and over again everytime Ryzen gets an update. I personally think they should keep those scores the way they are. then you can see how far you've come from day 1

>>60509032
then they should add a disclaimer. though i do admit, i love my 1800x, but amd should have waited till june to release.

File: 1234.jpg (253KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 806x402px

I have a bunch of shit running in the background
Installs and stuff, does that matter much?

File: Screenshot_20170520-235433.png (54KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 768x1024px

Best cpu-z ITT coming through.

>>60487871
>D0
come on senpai, you can do at least 4ghz guaranteed.

I wish there were a good equivalent to CPU-Z on linux. lm-sensors can only detect my GPU and that's it. I have to go to my motherboard BIOS if I want to check how my CPU's doing, which is completely pointless.

>>60490557
Had it existed when I got this, there's a good chance I would have.

>>60501435
Indeed. I get by with an old core2duo + phc-intel. and limiting the clock speeds. I can run at 80% of max clock speed (2.13 GHz / 2.66) with only a .025 volt increase over the minimum (0.9v / 0.875) and it uses so little power that I have the fan locked at its lowest speed and the CPU can't get over 60°C at full load. I can even run passive cooling with no fan at all at 1.6 GHz / min voltage.

But the performance would be SO much better on modern hardware (ignoring the IME bullshit).

I hear, however, that AMD may be releasing a new mobile chip, with no PSP. If there's some way to tweak the power usage, maybe I'll finally be willing to upgrade after 8 years...

>>60483583
>paying $500 for a 6 core
lol

>>60483893
poorfag

>>60484586
*house burns down*

>>60490806
wonder who this could be

>>60492228
>babby lake
>cant even overclock
is this the computer equivalent of putting on a chastity cage and watching a nigger fuck your wife?

>>60496862
>1.7 volts

>>60499441
>intel
>2017
you are never fine


>>60500114
>i3

>>60508303
>did i do good
>7700k
"no"

>>60509094
>I have a bunch of shit running in the background
>quad core
you fucked up

>>60509737
>phoneposting
die of aids

>>60510032
>paying $500 for a 6 core
Yeah, how many years ago? I can buy another one now, for just $1,900.


>>60496862
>6.12 GHz

File: 1494410921788.png (119KB, 320x252px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 320x252px

>>60510114
>how many years ago?
when the 6800k was launched, like 9 months ago

now fuck off cucktel shill

File: cpu.png (2KB, 317x59px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 317x59px

>>60509168
Eh, I'm already somewhat space heater here. And I'm an OC virgin so I know nothing of the process.

>>60510441
just get a ryzen 5 1600, that thing is outdated as fuck

>>60510441
45nm?! I thought my 22nm haswell was pushing it. Update that shit nigga

>>60510455
>>60510467
I'd love to do a new build, but I'm hella poorfag right now. Hell, this system isn't even really mine. It's on loan from a friend.

The only thing I have towards a new build thus far is a case, and that was only because I wanted to transfer this thing's guts into it to make it easier to maintain, and hopefully cut its temps down a bit; which didn't pan out because it turns out Alienwares are definitely not built to fit in anything but their own cases.

>>60510577
If poorfag, Xeon 6 cores are literally $20-$50 on eBay.
Very nice uplift in performance from a (usually) drop-in upgrade