Firecucks

because an open internet with free communication between users and the ability for anyone to make a website is kinda important for a search engine.

>>60464197
They got BTFO on the technology side, so now they have to pretend they're still relevant as some sort of internet activism group

>>60464197
> why do car companies have an interest in safety and emission standards?
> why do lawyers have an interest in legal proceedings?
> why do web app developers have an interest in the web?

Hmm..

>>60464197
nice leddit image

inb4 another /pol/ thread

>>60464236
>why do people only get upset about companies being political when it goes against the positions of Trump?

File: 1485188744698.gif (3MB, 311x175px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 311x175px

>>60464236


this makes absolutely no sense. kys

>>60464218
The only thing net neutrality will do is to make sure that if you have a data cap you can't get any additional services that don't count under the cap like free netflix or youtube or whatever.

>>60464250

>He doesnt think like us? homophobic homophobic!! racist, bigot, /pol/, fascist

Always using fucking buzzwords to control uh? now you sperg your bullshit, then run making everyone lose time

and because there is a topic about politics and technology it doesnt become automatically /pol/

GTFO

>ISP starts charging extra for non-kosher traffic
>new ISPs start on the basis of providing data-neutral traffic
>old ISPs go bankrupt

oh look the free market solved everything again

File: 1494818732519.jpg (38KB, 722x628px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 722x628px

>>60464197
the only reason i still use firecuck is because i hate google shit and some addons doesnt work on opera

File: 35976.jpg (7KB, 186x271px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 186x271px

>>60464382
Wow. Hit a nerve there, didn't he anon. You sure seem invested in defending against his point, I wonder why.

>>60464250

It was a fucking /pol/ thread from the start

>Why do they disagree with our lord and savior Trump fucking burn REEEEEEE

>>60464464
>New ISP doesn't do that because they can get away with not doing it
>Most of the ISPs get bought out by a single company
Yeah, the invisible hand of the free market will solve everything

>>60464490
>>60464502

Ok then you can fuck off thanks

>>60464464
>new ISPs get bought out, or bullied out of business with legislation because the government doesn't want the internet to be free either

>>60464464
>new isp
>in 'murica
oh im laffin

>>60464382
>why does company x not agree with me politically!!!!!!!1!!!
/pol/
>why does company x (who provide a technology related service) not agree with me politically!!!!!!!1!!!
/g/

Forgive me for not seeing the fucking logic here. You have your board for political discussion and it's over fucking there >>>/pol/

>>60464859
Because there cant be a topic about technology AND politics, take you weak bait argument somewhere else retard

>>60464197
we would have much better software if these faggots spent all the time that they use to post gender memes on fixing bugs and adding features instead.

File: 1486914432876.jpg (12KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 250x250px

>>60464363
>having data caps at all
fucking burgers

File: 28131_385095087897_753257897_4180927_3038004_n.jpg (51KB, 714x432px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 714x432px

it's sad so many moderate liberals push for something the fringe knows will end free speech for the right

Why are /pol/fags against net neutrality anyways, shouldn't they protect the law that allows equal access to all sites including their shitty nazi larping blogs?

>>60464297
>>60464382
>>60464502
Who are you quoting?

>>60465277
because rhetoric and what it actually entails are two different things. Why do liberals support government overreach when they have the worst history of censorship of the internet?

>>60465322
I'm pretty sure that the copyright lobby and tech giants are the pioneers of internet censorship. Infrastructure should be controlled by the government not some shekel hungry kikes.

>>60465387
if you mean tech giants like google and facebook who support net neutrality you would be right

File: 39036.jpg (80KB, 480x700px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 480x700px

>>60464304
it must suck to be retarded, keep trying maybe you'll find someone to call a cuck or something, that'll probably make you happy until mom calls you in for lunch time.

>>60464197
People have been passionate about net neutrality since you were a sperm bouncing around in your dad's wrinkly ballsack junior, no need to get frazzled because you're too young to understand the argument.

File: 39916.jpg (144KB, 500x592px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 500x592px

>>60465277
Someone convinced these jackasses that net neutrality is bad for some undetermined reason, I'm guessing they just like to be contrarian assholes like they do with everything else. Whatever, I hope their parents have fun paying an extra $100 so they can e-LARP on their favorite sites.

>>60464197
(((Open source))) is just more degeneracy the (((communists))) have created. Open source is anti white.

>>60465469
that's some stretch-armstrong level reaching you're doing there Opie

>>60465277
Daddy trump is against net neutrality so /pol/cucks have to gargle down his zionist cock like good goys.

I don't understand why anyone who isn't looking to screw the consumer would be against net neutrality. It basically says packets are packets, and should all be treated the same. You can't slow them down or block them based on origin, destination, or content. It keeps the internet a level playing field, instead of being biased towards the interests of the few large ISPs that dominate 99% of America.

>>60465277
Because they don't have a real opinion on the matter.

They will support whatever decision Trump makes even if it goes against their interests or beliefs because they convinced themselves that not supporting him makes them a liberal transgender "cuck"; whatever that means.

File: 1444787808625.gif (85KB, 501x585px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 501x585px

>>60465469
>willingly discarding your freedoms because some germaboo luddite told you free software is communism
good goy

>>60465277
Because it's more government regulation which libertarians don't like. Also I guess it can fuck up new ISPs because they don't have enough bandwidth to service everyone who's trying to see the new trending video on Youtube but they can't do anything to shape the traffic.

>>60465536
Except net neutrality is /g/ related too.

>>60465526
Nu-/pol/ would cheer on trump making anti-semitism a crime if trump did it because something something 1488D chess.

>>60464464
>New ISP

Are you retarded? ISP do not share cables,nor utility poles

>>60465469

nice fucking false flag, now install me Temple OS goyim

>>60465585
>trying to imply that all packets are not equal
>trying to artificially hamper technology
Ludditism is not /g/ related.

>>60465652
>thinks it's impossible for new ISPs to form

>>60465655
Nice try kike, I'm not going to work for free with (((free software))).

>>60464297
Didn't mozilla fire it's CEO for donating to a anti-gay organization? Didn't realize that was linked to Trump

>>60465672
Not impossible in theory, but extremely unlikely and impractical. The amount of money it would cost to run the new infrastructure would raise the cost of entry so high that it would take decades to turn a profit.

>>60465705
>10 rupees have been deposited into your account

>>60465711

The is still in charge or what happened later? i don't remember

>>60464197
>if you heart
>heart
Man, i sure miss those times when normies didnt even know what internet was

>>60465705
Keep promoting free software with your bullshit.

>>60465735
>10 shekels have been deposited into your account

>>60465277
/pol/ fag here, we aren't, where did you get the idea?

File: enjoy, faggot.jpg (85KB, 501x588px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 501x588px

>>60464363
>the only thing
what did he mean by this
inb4 "muh free market"

File: türk.jpg (24KB, 539x303px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 539x303px

>>60464197
Obama already let it do for users it's usually unnoticed.

>If you heart
fuck you. luckily no one has to see that page more than once.

>>60465816
Only burgers see it or at least i have never saw it.

File: 1493591084407.jpg (72KB, 512x600px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 512x600px

>>60465469

>>60465839
Can /leftypol/ make a single original meme?

>>60465711
It wasn't related to Trump. They're just scumbags. Eich is working on Brave, which is decent.

>>60465782
I know I am making the "/pol/ is one person" fallacy, but it seems to me that mostly right-wingers from /pol/ are against net neutrality, especially in this thread. I'd think that nat-soc folks shouldn't be against net neutrality, right? Last time I checked they were against corporate kikes judging which network packets should have (((special))) treatment. I'm hoping that it's just the lolbertarians shitposting here.

>>60465903
Natsocs are commies by another name.

>>60465903
They're torn between their hatred for jewish corporations and increased government reach.

>>60465903
/pol/ is made up of natsoc, libertarians and ancaps, and traditional conservatives. The libertarian/ancap crowd is against net neutrality like any regulation that could allow the gooberment to overreach, but they also forget that small government is currently blocking regional competition and most towns in American only have one cable provider.

>>60465937
NN wouldn't need to exist if only allowing one ISP and one cable company in a city or town was illegal.

so does pol support it or not I need to know this decide my stance on the issue

>>60464363
>data caps
Stop living in a nigger country

>>60465969
(((They))) do allow more than one comapny. By which I mean those jews in municipal government don't hard block late comers, they just enforce high costs and restrictive regulations when a company wants to lay lines in the ground or use existing public utility. Google fiber broke into certain locations just by paying out the ass, though some cities actually invited Google in because they smelled the opportunity of gentrification.

>>60466097
Some cities do have laws only allowing one cable and one ISP because of special deals.

File: 1487129839545.png (547KB, 980x830px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 980x830px

>>60464197
Even the botnet is better at this point.

>>60464197
>net neutrality is like the 1st Amendment
>We made our incredibly talented CEO quit his job because he exercised his 1st Amendment right and we didn't like it
I hope the internet gets destroyed and then the sun explodes..

>>60464363

Are you fucking retarded?

... That's not how it works.

It means that ISPs won't be able to sell your internet history (hint: this is bad). It means that ISPs won't be able to charge content hosts and creators THAT YOU LIKE (read: Netflix etc) an additional fee (disguised under whatever pretense) to keep bandwidth to their servers prioritised rather than their rival's. And make no mistake, this 'fee' WILL GET PASSED ONTO YOU. Leaving only your ISP's pockets richer. That's just a hint of the shenanigans that neutrality helps to ward off.

>>60464363
this is why there are people against net neutrality
the brainwashing is more than skin deep.

>>60464197
>heart this, heart that
What is this, 2009?

>>60465277
I'm no /pol/ but when I see multinational corporations with a huge rapsheet on tax evasion, antitrust law violations, ties with governments and corrupt fake news mainstream media and multiple instances of bad security and badly written proprietary software like apple, microsoft, google, facebook, twitter, etc support something (in this case "net neutrality") I'm automatically sceptical against it.

The point being I'm not going to defend their position and become a pawn in their schemes. For me and the people to win they have to loose.

Fuck them, they already have their greedy claws inside the corrupts governments and intergovernmental organizations anyway, I'm not going to provide them with an alibi to step on my rights. I don't support globalism

Fuck the new mozilla

>>60464218
firefox is not a search engine dingus

>>60464197
>not supporting net neutrality
[muffled hand-rubbing in the distance]

Mozilla has always been using their free soapbox to bring attention to privacy concerns, Firefox was designed as a browser for the privacy concerned and Thunderbird/Sunbird were designed as a mail client and calendar for the privacy concerned.

>>60466256
Good goy detected

>>60464464
>What are cartels?
If you can't identify the de facto monopolies you're a dumb bitch.

>>60464197
Fuck net neutrality

If "web design" wasn't the javascript powered bloated mess that it is we wouldn't need net neutrality and data caps because web pages wouldn't need 50MB of random ever changing libraries to display a paragraph of text

Screw net neutrality. Net neutrality ends up supporting the current sorry state of "web design" because there is no incentive for light weight web sites

File: Screenshot from 2017-05-18 14-59-31.png (119KB, 1509x659px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1509x659px

>>60467880

Web pages aren't the problem anon, it's video streaming. More specifically, ISPs (who also sell you video content) don't want to put the money into improving their networks just to help Netflix and friends.

>>60467880

Gotta love it when I visit a mainstream website and noscript brings up a list with a scrollbar

>>60464197
Internet is infrastructure. You cannot have functional deregulated infrastructure.
Only stupid people think the internet can work without net neutrality. ISP are constantly trying to give you less than you paid for and they WILL abuse an unregulated internet the moment they are allowed to.

>>60464197
Net neutrality is the result of "copyright" laws
>100 users on an isp want to watch a shitty movie
>100 users should redownload the shitty drm encrypted movie from netflix
>hur-dur-dur, we need net neutrality because piracy is bad, okay?

Without "copyright" laws
>100 users on an isp want to watch a shitty movie
>1 users downloads it and uploads it to his ftp server
>"hey guys, I downloaded a shitty movie, do you want to grab it from ftp?"
>only one copy of the shitty movie gets downloaded, the channel remains free for communication and research

Delete "copyright" and we don't need net neutrality

>>60468462

but mu-h shekels goyim!!!!!

>>60465566
>Because it's more government regulation
NO. It's not MORE. It's exactly the same it is right now.

>Also I guess it can fuck up new ISPs
There will be no new ISP because deregulated internet allows existing big players to strongarm the shit out of any small competition.

>oh, what a nice cheap you have there. let me offer this service to your customers FOR FREE

>>60468509
You can earn shekels by
>cinema tickets
>physical media sales

Once someone buys your shitty movie it belongs to him and can freely create file copies and redistribute it freely

You are already filthy rich from cinema tickets. Fuck off.

>but I can't pay the overrated meme actors
>b-but I will go out of business!
Good riddance

>>60468462
>Net neutrality is the result of "copyright" laws
This is probably the dumbest thing I read on /g/ today.

because modern day political ideologies are basically massive cults for the nigger cattle

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mnNSe5XYp6E

>>60464382
>>>/pol/

>>60464197
who ever controls the media, controls the mind.

>>60468671
It sort of works if you replace cult with google.
It doesn't work if you replace cult with conservatism or socialism the free software movement.

File: 2312313.jpg (47KB, 1067x600px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 1067x600px

how are your data cap, burgers?

feels so good living in a country with hundreds of independent ISPs, no data caps and eu laws protecting my net neutrality.

sent from my unlimited gigabit connection for 25€. keep on being cucked.

>>60464197
>Why are technology compenies so enthralled by politics today?
Maybe because it's directly related to what they do, dingus.
Specially considering it's an open source project.

>another thread derailed by leftist schmucks
Can y'all just stay on topic for one God damn minute? I don't like veiled /pol/posting either but y'all get fuckin rowdy the moment you spot a political trigger word.

>>60465711
desu, looking at what he is doing now, it was for the better. otherwise firefox would now be riddled with ads so that (((eich))) can profit from it.

>>60465782
Hey look at this guy.
He thinks that he can speak for over 500000 people, when it shows a lot of them are butt blasted about this topic.
Hey guy, fuck you.

>>60470191
Who gives a fuck about your politics you tard.
Fuck off.

>>60470427
Nobody should. That's exactly why these leftist idiots shouldn't be derailing threads.

File: 1486418152833.jpg (2MB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2400x3000px

>>60467880
STICK TO THE SCRIPT ANON
YOU CAN'T REVEAL OUR PLANS

>>60470618
a-shit pile can go fuck himself. People keep saying he's caving to lobbyists for money but I'm convinced he's just that delusional. Trump only appointed the best and brightest, amirite?
fuck

>>60464197
Since when did /g/ think net neutrality was a bad thing?

>>60470748
Since the beginning of time

File: 1464035274449.jpg (3MB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x3000px

>>60470795
YESSSSSSSSSSSSSS
MORE, MORE
WE NEED YOU TO POST FASTER

File: 1471707613595.gif (1MB, 300x188px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x188px

>>60464197
>we rid of employees who donate to the wrong political group
>"net neutrality is important like the 1st amendment guiz!"

>>60468462
this thread isn't /pol/ because it's political, it's /pol/ because it's fucking retarded.

>>60468666
tasty trips

>>60470484

You can only tell leftist to fuck off, nothing else, they literally don't do another thing than derail since it doesn't go with their narrative

>>60464197
Fuck nu-Mozilla in every possible way, but here for once they're advocating for the right thing. Net neutrality isn't fucking political by itself. It became a tool in a political game, but that doesn't mean it's bad, regardless which side of the political dispute claims it as their "own".

t. alt-right neo-nazi Trump-supporting /pol/ack

>>60467450
>when I see multinational corporations support something (in this case "net neutrality") I'm automatically sceptical against it.
But that's a silly fallacy anon, you're uncritically giving up on a thing because of its association with (or rather monopolization by) people you don't like. In other words, you act like a mindless sheep.

Read up what Net Neutrality is and what the lack of it implies and then decide for yourself if it's something you want to advocate for. I for one would stand in one line with pink-haired SJWs, trannies and nu-male cucks to defend it. Deus Vult.

Why are Mudshark Fingerblaster fans so enthralled by long black cocks?

>>60470748
It doesn't, /pol/ is just failing to contain its retards.

>>60471856
>he doesn't agree with me, must be /pol/!!!
Go be a retard somewhere else.

>>60466931
>people on /g/ trying to into politics
You're embarrassing yourself.

>>60464304
who is

>she

>>60471856

Hey you're 7 months late to be correcting the record you mustard fart shill

>>60472710
>everyone I don't like is CTR!!!!
Hillary lost, dude. Get over it.