Threadripper Thread

mom!! look!! i posted it again!!

File: images.jpg (9KB, 257x196px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 257x196px

>>60436773
ITS NOT FAIR

>>60436773
>implying kids or NEETs are going to care about $1000 16-core workstation processors
I never understood why Intel marketed the Extreme series for gaming.

>>60436837
because gaymur kiddies buy that shit and intel knows it

>>60436760
thread theme: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okB2NlA4uOM

>>60436800
>>60436837

what if i just don't give a fuck and i'm tired of seeing the same threads with the same arguments every thread and every possible argument being already beat to death?

my next build is going to be amd by the way you retards

>>60436875
Hide them. There are at least a hundred threads up at any given moment, a handful of threads about some of the most significant changes in the desktop CPU market in years shouldn't be causing you this much asspain.

File: 1486234195347.jpg (18KB, 387x387px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 387x387px

>>60436869

>>60436875
But its funny to watch intel get cucked its 1999 today for me

>>60436760
Threads confirmed ripped.

AM4 already dead

Sad

>>60436869
>Ryzen
>Team Red finally beats Intel
>This is the Rising
>This is the Ryzen

>>60437087
AM4 is general desktop market, i.e. gaymen and your average OEM desktop. This is for workstations.

>>60437115
not even threadripper is on am4

>>60437174
That's my point. Threadripper is for workstations. People aren't going to be upgrading from their six core desktop CPU to a 16 core part like threadripper, because the two are not even marketed to the same crowd.

>>60437235
Watch me...

>>60437174
no it isnt, it will be on a platform like intel's x299

>>60437730
that's exactly what i said

>>60437750
i miss read it then

>>60437271
Nah. People looking for a workstation e.g. for CAD, rendering, encoding, audio etc. will just build around the new socket, people buying a desktop for general or gaymen use will buy AM4.

Was anything said about future iterations of Zen? If next Zen is on 7nm, then I might just go with the 1600 instead of the 1700 and then go all in on the next iteration.

File: Fjwswbz.jpg.4e8a0a7bb0014dcfa873f5fcee090a94[1].jpg (86KB, 608x369px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 608x369px

>Up to 16 cores

>>60438091
took a while

>>60438091
it's a workstation cpu you moron

ofc they're going for more cores

Price?
Price???

File: Hope.png (15KB, 353x606px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 353x606px

>>60438091
>mfw Skylake-X is DOA

>>60437770
i miss reading too

>>60436760
Intlel literally dead

>>60438159
in the Q&A, they tried to conceal epyc will be around 800 bucks.

so I expect threadripper to be around 550-600 and price cut for 1800X.

>>60436760
AMD comes up with the gayest names.

>>60439991
Nah thats intel.

>Skylake
>Kaby Lake
>Coffle Lake
>Ice Lake

>>60439964
No it won't be, Naples directly compete against $10000 Xeons

>>60440088
Yes, we know Zen is more efficient.
I find it hilarious how their 8 cores consume less power than competitor quad cores.

>>60440088
ouch.........Intel is the fucking housefire meme now.

And the Zen chips are on a larger more innefficent process too. If this chip was fab on intels process the clocks would probably be in the 4.4-4.5ghz range as well.

When AMD moves to 7nm intel is fucked.....

Damn, what would you even do with that many cores?

>>60439991

You mean metal as fuck names.

While Intel offers coffe lake sipping waiting for ice lake dancing

>>60441089
Virtual Machines and workstation shit

>>60436760
>ITT: people who don't realize AMD is fucking up Intel's main source of income which is OEM purchases

Hell, Ryzen's regular release alone would fuck up Intel's workstation's market since it's cheap as shit and gets similar performance.

>>60441185
But it's not going after that high-end desktop market segment. That's what this thing is going after. If I had to take a guess I would say probably $1500-$1200 but there's no way in hell that the full 16 cores under 1000 I'm a place a bet that the 12 thread is a sub thousand dollars CPU

Also I wouldn't put too far past and the put out a SKU that is eight cores, roughly the same performance as the 1800 X but with quad channel memory support

>>60436837
Again we've seen it time and time again in benchmarks, the most recent comprehensive one was with Haswell where they showed off and i5 and i7 and the six core and eight core i7 extremes.

What you seem was the eye five to i7 had a significant performance jump depending on game, then from the four core i7 to the six core i7, you saw a significant jump in a few games but the games that didn't see a jump in and see maximum performance regress but they saw the minimums jump up as well, and then with the eight core you saw even when the background processes decide to demand 100% of the CPU core it did not affect your gameplay period, this is why they marketed it to gamers. The quality of life with eight real cores or even six real cores is such a significant jump up from four cores it's nothing to joke about.

>>60441231
Thread Ripper is what you can use instead of those dual socket Xeon rigs.

OEMs will eat that shit up and push intel out.

Do you know how much threads Workstations work with? There's also the Opteron series coming out with 48 cores on one processor, if it's at 1/3rd the price of Intel's equivalent, that's it for them,

> I wouldn't put too far past and the put out a SKU that is eight cores,

there most likely won't be a need for that since companies that buy workstations rarely saturate their RAM Capacity.

>>60436932
>took AMD 18 years to pull ahead again
that's kind of embarrassing

>>60436875
>it's okay when intelfags do it!

>>60440423
Honestly probably not, AMD's previous CPUs were hitting 5 GHz on what was it 32 nm? There's something in the design of Zen that is voltage limit know whether that can be fixed with the node change that's something I don't know.

>>60441448
>>60440423
Maybe both of them are fucked, mainly because when you get to that level, silicon becomes useless and you have to deal with quantum tunneling.

It's kind of why CoffeeLake is delayed and why Kabylake was so lackluster

>>60440088

hahahahhahahahhaha Intel is BTFO

Nevermind the Zen price will x/2 of the Jewtel offering.

>>60441089

You haven't seen my PhotoShopping.

>>60441341

Looks like someone is beyond the revised Newegg 30 Day return policy on Intel procs.

>>60441341

AMD is like 1/18th the size of Intel. It's actually very impressive.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (101KB, 1543x824px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1543x824px

>>60436760
fixed

>>60441507
No quantum tunneling starts come into play past 14 nm, at least for main issue that you need to work around I believe that 7 nm it becomes insurmountable, at least to go further than 7 nm, possibly six I forget which ones the hard limit.

File: For you.gif (48KB, 2034x1491px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 2034x1491px

>>60441089
encourage developers to multithread so intel can get BTFO

>>60441806
DId you even read what I said?

CannonLake is supposed to be 10nm, and they have had problems with it, which is why it's delayed. It's also the reason why they didn't test out 10nm with Kabylake.

>>60436837
Gaymers don't read detailed reviews. Marketing works effectively on them. Corsair, Razer, Geforce is testament of that.

File: threadripper.png (186KB, 295x352px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 295x352px

>>60436760
THREADRIPPER

>>60441859
>Geforce is a testament to that

I realize /g/ is AMD central, but you can't be this dumb.

>>60441742

You've got class anon.

File: threadripper02.png (779KB, 601x832px) Image search: [Google]

779KB, 601x832px

>>60436760
THREAD RIPPER

File: thread_dripper.png (214KB, 358x500px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 358x500px

>>60436760
THREAD DRIPPER

>>60436857
they can't afford it

but knowing their favourite streamer has one makes them happier about the pentium or i3 in mom's dell

File: 23123888888888888.png (193KB, 491x418px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 491x418px

HOLY SHIT FUCK YES!!!!!

>>60436760
But... But I just bought an 1800X

Why AMD?

>>60436875
enjoy it while it lasts senpai

been days since i saw one of the rust shill threads as everyone's busy sperging out over hardware

File: Thread_Agrippa.png (439KB, 476x655px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 476x655px

>>60436760
THREAD AGRIPPA

>>60441089
Edit video

>>60441089
you wouldn't buy overpriced xeons anymore.

>>60436760
>Threadripper
don't know why but this make me think of braaap posters

>>60441089
Run a webserver that can host 32 sessions at the same time.

Intel is currently running with 20 max, so think of what (for example) Google's server farms will do when each server can now handle 37% more users per.

>>60436760
will there be a way to disable psp
if not im not interested

File: broken-lcd-screen-replacement-psp-repairs-331-p.jpg (133KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 500x375px

>>60442440
>disable psp

Easy

File: thread_flipper.png (180KB, 298x447px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 298x447px

>>60436760
THREAD FLIPPER

>>60442440
it's interesting that removing that piece of shit would give AMD an immediate edge over Intel in a security-conscious market, but they insist on keeping it for some reason

>>60442462
> remove it for security

PSP = "Pretty Secure Processor" lol

>>60441089
analyze chess

>>60437235
>People aren't going to be upgrading from their six core desktop CPU to a 16 core part like threadripper
I'm planning to do exactly that senpai, my 3930K work pc is starting to feel its age now and I need something more

With my main workloads being compiling, video encoding and vm abuse I could really use the 10+ cores of newer top-end parts

>oh hey look at my 16c/32t chip that i bought
why don't you have an AIO on it
>because AIOs are totally a meme bro, look at my sweet Noctua
why is there smoke coming out of your case
>its a light overclock, hits high temps some times but it's okay its just some metal
what sort of temps are you at
>um like 30c on idle but when the CPU is on load it hits like 130c
why don't you get an AIO for better temps
>bro i can't fall for those memes!

>>60439991
I keep thinking their marketing department is run by a 15 year old

>>60440001
>>60441119
Intel should troll us all and call their next shit "meme lake" instead

>>60441448
The process itself is terrible for high clocks as it's designed for low power mobile designs which generally clock lower. A plus is the increased efficiency though.
Voltage walls are normally always introduced by the manufacturing process rather than the architecture.

A nice example for this were the Qualcomm Krait cores.
The quad-core S4 Pro clocked at 1.4 GHz, while the quad-core 805 clocked at 2.6 GHz. Both run at around the same voltage at maximum frequency.
The core design itself was virtually unchanged and the only difference was them switching from 28 nm LP to 28 nm HPm

>>60436760
>dripper

heh

>>60436760
>tfw AMD's behemoth processors are going to fucking annihilate Intel in work that actually matters
>tfw companies are going to snap up these threadripper chips because they cost so much less and can do much more than Intel counterparts
>tfw /v/ continues to bash Ryzen because it gets 120 frames in muh gaymes instead of 150 like the Jewtel 7777k (only $399 goy)

>>60442850

Intels chips were overpriced because they could charge that much without a second thought from consumers.

Now watch as Intel releases their own 8c/16t chips for $450 that shit all over Ryzen.

>>60436760
BTFO to /v/, retard, stop garbaging this board.

>>60442593
>BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>hey bro is there buzzing coming from your case?
>nah brah I don't hear it
>*buzzing intensifies*
>bro is that your water pump in your Corsair H1200i Liquid Max Dick Replacement?
>t'cha brah, but I can't hear it
>bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>BZZZZZ-
>water is spilled on motherboard, looks like the cheap as fuck chinese fitting broke

Watercooling is a fucking meme, and AIOs are an even bigger meme.

>>60442875
>Intel
>reducing prices

TOPKEK

>>60442127
Even when AMD was undoubtedly the best with the 4000 series, it still didn't outsell Nvidia. Right now, Nvidia has an incredible lead and if Volta comes out soon, then we will be looking at an AMD with no answer to the entire lineup until Navi hits in Q4 2018 to Q1 2019. That's just terrifying. I'm hoping their Vega lineup can at least best mid-highend Pascal. They are being way too secretive with Vega, why haven't they said anything? This just puts doubt instead of hype. I have a bad feeling it's going to turn out into a disaster, with high end Vega not even besting the 1080Ti. Nvidia still has the Titan Xp, so they could release another Ti revision to fuck things up.

File: CyowSGh.jpg (68KB, 768x960px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 768x960px

>>60436760
Still relevant today.

>>60436837
My sisters husband makes about two million USD (converted from the local currency) a year.

He's the only one I know who buys rigs like that for gaming. Then again he has 3 copies of some BlueRay movies because he pretty much works 24/7 and my sister does too (she also has a demanding high-paying job but not that high-paying) so they think "Oh that's a movie I want to see" and buy it and then they forget and buy it again (and again).

>>60436857
There's a bit of a difference between a kid asking for a Razer headset even though it's got garbage audio quality because he's seen it on youtube and a kid asking for a $4000 gaming-rig. Parents may give into one of those but I doubt many will buy some kid a rig that will cost them a months salary.

>>60442815
I didn't know the process could make such a huge difference. That's really interesting. I'm curious for the ZEN revision on 14nm+ now.

>>60440088
Those two are actually going to be roughly even in heat and power consumption. Intel and AMD don't measure TDP the same way.

>>60443002
Jokes on you, AMD IPC is better than intel's.

What's happening is that intel is releasing an i9 series (MAKE MORE CORES), while AMD are making better processors with still more cores.
Intel's like:
>Hah, 8 cores? Take this, 10 CORES!
AMD is like
>Yeah dude we're on 32 now glhf

>>60443219
TDP isn't measured, it's assigned.

They take the power draw and then assign a TDP for that number- it's a number that's designed to be used when designing cooling for the chip.
So it is a number that means you need x amount of cooling, not that it uses x amount of watts.
It's a subtle difference, complicated by the fact that watts in does equal watts out, but people have trouble understanding that TDP is not watts out.

>>60443002
Nah, Intel took it way too easy. They should have been like Nvidia, being relentless instead of releasing Sandy Bridge for 6 years. Now not only are they behind on IPC, they're also behind on efficiency. Intel process manufacturing is smaller than the competition and it still consumes more power than Ryzen. The moment AMD gets higher clocks and smaller nodes is when Intel is finished. 7nm is confirmed next generation, so they have until then. Skylake-X looks DOA to me and Naples is looking to be a killer as well.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZRgnlRPTTQ

>>60443351
>NVIDIA
>relentless
Of fucking course it's fucking GPUs. You can simply throw more hardware. NVIDIA does exactly that.

>>60440088
>trusting AMD """"TDP""""

>>60442595

Thermal Lakes
Steam Geysers
Volcanic Isles

File: amd vs intel.jpg (89KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 800x1000px

>>60438091

Motherboards when?

File: 1489122339460.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>60436760
I CAN'T TAKE IT ANYMORE

>>60444231
>Volcanic Isles
amd already kinda took that one for gpus

maybe that's what intel is really after in all these "intel licencing gpu shit from amd" rumours

>>60443002
Here's your (You) don't waste it

>>60444478
but this is what AMD is doing now with Ryzen.... (see the second number anon?)

> can't afford i7 anymore
> they now make an even more expensive segment - both companies

...gay.

>>60442884
Like it or not, you need a watercooling for this "HEDT" segment.

>>60442437
What the fuck, are you retarded? One single core can handle more then 1 session. It can probably handle thousands.

>>60442884
I literally can't aircool my cpus for the clocks I'm running.
It isn't a meme, it's a fucking fact for larger cpus.

We back in action?

>>60442381
kids can't afford anything that has never mattered, if you don't think jackass parents are paying a thousand dollars for an i9 so their rotten kid can play minecraft you're a fool.

>>60442425
>b-but I like getting a $50 processor that requires a $300 motherboard....

>>60445884
>larger CPUS
what are you running, old G5's?

>>60445936
Two x5680s at 4.5ghz

>>60440088
Whoa somebody saved my image

>>60442925
High end Vega won't even be able to compete against the GTX 1070, which is already a low-end card with the release of the GTX 1080 Ti.

>>60446024
try harder mate.

>>60446083
Where's your proof that it can even go toe to toe against the GTX 1080 Ti?

Oh, wait, you don't have any, which is why it's only going to go against the GTX 1070.

AMD is a failure in the GPU market. CPU market is currently a different story.

>>60436837
AMD is stupid as hell if they make it $1000 for the 16-core.
It needs to be CHEAP to fuck intel even harder
R7 1800x is about $450, if this thing comes ou ar around $700-$750 it will absolutely btfo the entire industry

if they make it $1k+ they're just going to do what intel does and have some ultra-high end chip that only begging children will buy (especially since datacenters and servers will buy naples instead anyway).

All that R&D money will be wasted on a CPU that they will sell like 5 of.

>>60446239
>only begging children will buy

You're retarded >>60445908

I probably won't need to write grants any more to fund my research. I can literally set up an entire lab for a couple thousand dollars. This shit is crazy.

>>60446269
I know it happens, all I'm saying is that for every kid begging his shitfaced parents to buy him a $5000 xeon system there are probably thousands of regular joes building PCs.

If AMD makes it ~$700 not only will more regular joes buy it, but the parents will be more likely to buy it too. It's a win-win.

>>60446295
I doubt they clock these cores like an 1800X

If ryzen is already at a disadvantage for single-thread, this is only going to make it a worse option for gamers

>>60446295
Well since the 16-core destroys Intel's lineup and their 8-core is a bit less than $500 then it should be slightly below $1000

>>60446312
it will have the same if not better ipc, and 16 core is rumored to be 3.9GHz, which is the same as 1800X. It will probably be >100% scaling

>>60441668
And it will come out in june instead of august
intel is dead in the fucking water

>>60446355
From a physical standpoint you aren't going to be able to clock these beyond what an 1800X can do

You'll run into cooling issues and the odds of getting a poorly binned core increase exponentially

I just don't see this as a good option for gamers.

>>60446312
>Intel's 8 cores
>MOAR GIGAHURTZ
Pick one and only one.

>>60446417
it's also a larger chip, which helps the cooling.
poorly binned core is only twice the chance rather than exponential because of the CCX

>>60445856
however many sessions one core can handle, this can handle 16 times as many.

>>60445956
there's nothing an AIO can do that an NH-D15 can't do

>>60445554
>intel licenses AMD gpus in their CPUs
>AMD outsells intel CPUs

year of the goy revolution throwing intel out

>>60436760
Can't wait to build a thread ripper vega system. Shit will be great.

>>60440088
6900k at 4.3GHz is INFERNAL, this shit is fucking ridiculous.

>>60442894
this
even if they do reduce prices
they literally can't compete
intel cores don't scale the way ryzen cores do.
an 8 core intel will still be slower on multithread than an 1800x because of their retarded ring system

>>60437235
May be designed for workstations, but it will outperform r7 in games.

>>60443371
same as cpus

>>60445759
ryzen r5 costs way less than i7 did.
that's there for you

>>60446271
imagine when they release $1000-$1200 32 core naples systems that destroy +$10k intel systems

>>60446589
>32 core naples
$1500-$2000

>>60443325
You can measure it. Stick a cooler on it with variable cooling potential, and ramp up the cooling until the chip stops changing in temperature. Then you do a little math to see how much heat your cooler is dissipating and you know your TDP.

The difference between AMD and Intel is the workloads they measure their TDPs at. Intel uses a power virus while AMD uses a heavy workload. Intel's SDP figure is the equivalent to the industry standard for TDP.

>>60446624
1. no way
2. even if it was, the point still stands, intel's top of the line 24 core is over 7 thousand fucking dollars

>>60446624
But does it have 64 threads?

>>60446661
>$7000
fucking intel jews

>>60446661
>>60446713

>intel's top of the line 24 core is over 7 thousand fucking dollars

that's the octa config

The E5-2699v4 is much more comparable and is $4.1k

Still ridiculous, but let's get our numbers straight

>>60446312
Please stop and consider the implications of 1800x overclocking being voltage rather than thermally limited.

Assuming they bin Threadripper the same as the 1800x, the only reason to have lower clocks would be if the additional heat generated by the second set of cores was too much more than could be reasonably cooled.

Considering the temperatures an 1800x hits at stock clocks, it would appear AMD has quite a bit of heat headroom before they would have to turn down the clocks.

>>60446831
I was referring to the overclocking overhead. Obviously that's a consideration for someone buying an 1800X CPU.

If this HEDT shit doesn't give me 9001 fps in gaymen then it's fucking worthless trash.

>buying threadripoff when i9 exists

>>60446417
To all the idiots in this thread that think threadripper is intended for gaming:


HOW ARE YOU THIS RETARDED
It's a workstation CPU designed for and marketed towards the professional market. 1800x remains AMD's top "gaming" CPU, this is a different segment entirely

>>60447301
if you follow the thread I was arguing the exact same thing you are

see >>60446295

>>60447193
I'm sure it can in quake.

>>60443086
What does your sisters husband do?

>>60446185
This isn't even fun shitposting anymore, up your game you piece of shit.

>>60447301
Generally, what's the difference between cpus that target workstations and those that target gaming? Genuine question, didn't think it mattered all that much

>>60442481
I thought it was Pajeet System Police

NIGGERSNIGGERS

>>60442875
The margins on Intel's high core count processors are so slim, they often can't afford to sell it much cheaper than they are.
Zen is a much simpler arch to fab, with much more redundancy built in.

File: 1482564329258.png (263KB, 723x890px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 723x890px

>>60438091

>>60448278
you really eat that marketing bullshit up, huh?
it costs intel fucking peanuts

>>60448597
Someone doesn't understand Zen's architecture versus Intel's three ringbus circus ..

THE EAR RIPPER

>>60448309
The fact that Intel can still be competitive with a rehashed aritechture only shows how far AMD was behind

>>60448758
Doesn't change the fact that it costs intel peanuts and selling these chips is almost pure unadulterated profit.

AMD's process is more efficient yes, but that doesn't make intels profit margins "slim", it just makes AMD's "slimmer"

>>60448597
>it costs intel fucking peanuts
hahaha no
Intel had this great idea of making huge monolithicc dies. That means when they set out to make a 24-core Xeon and one, just one fucking core misbehaves in some way, they can throw the entire thing in a bin.
Meanwhile AMD just glues together consumer-tier 8-core dies and calls it a day. There's a very small latency penalty, but it pays off in the long run since it's more reliable manufacturing-wise.

File: 1494807564827.jpg (417KB, 1515x1104px) Image search: [Google]

417KB, 1515x1104px

>>60436760
THE SCOOPRIPPER HAS ARRIVED BOYS

>>60440423
>inefficient
They're on 14nm lpp

>>60448899
>latency penalty
Y$ah amd is laggy4y4y4 shit
my4 malware does not let me ty4pe properly4

>>60448899

Ironic considering Intel's first real dual core chips where jsut two single core chips glued together not unlike how ryzen is built. That said there are some tasty, tasty performance gains to be had by using an inclusive L3 - something MCM doesn't lend itself to.

>>60448927
Compared to Intel's second generation 14nm process, it probably is.

>>60448899
and i thought intel shills on this board were a meme

for everyone else reading this thread, there's what really happens:
>intel tries to make fuckhueg everything so they can charge 7k/CPU
>when they fuck one core up they sell it to you as a "premium(r) high performance(tm) prime(c) 22-core" instead
>when they really fuck absolutely everything ip and have only the worst most retarded silicon left over, they sell it to gamer kiddies as 4 core peices of shit and people still pay 100s of dollars for their leftovers

>>60448899
>>60448980
meanwhile AMD spent all their R&D money on making the most fast and efficient 4-core CCX and most efficient way of connecting them since not only is what what people like you and me (the majority of the market anyway) actually use, they can scale both the prices and performance up basically linearly so there's enough performance regardless of your needs without assraping you on prices

>>60448980
TFW shit leftovers > AMD in per core performance

>>60448980
That's not how it works either. Intel does produce multiple different dies, you know. There's no 24-core CPU with 20 of its cores disabled being sold anywhere.

>>60449045
nobody's forcing you to buy AMD right now
but their stuff can only get faster, while there's only so much perfume you can put on a pile of shit and intel's reign is coming to an end really quickly because they neglected to stop jewing around and actually improve things when times were good

>>60449045
Yeah, that's why the $490 8-core 1800x beats the $1,000 8-core 6900k, and gets close to the $1,650 10-core 6950X, right?

>>60449084
can't wait to see what the 650$ 16 core does to intel's profit margins KEK

File: 1407480053005.png (58KB, 553x759px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 553x759px

>>60448980
>>60449027
>and i thought intel shills on this board were a meme

How is this Intel shilling? That's what AMD does and I've never said it's bad. They take the same dies they use for the consumer chips and wire them together.

>there's what really happens
It's called binning and it was clearly referenced, which you would have seen were you not a mouth-breathing retard.

Anon, for fuck's sake, get your shit together.

>>60449084
Beatsd
beatsd at what dude
not at sdingle core performance for sdure

and alsdo it isd 2 y4earsd old and amd isd new
new intel will kick amd in the vagina.

>>60449122
>Broadwell-E BTFO
>Skylake-X DOA
>Every Intel mobile CPU BTFO
>Every Intel server CPU BTFO

Another fucking Shoah, that's what. Time for those kiketel fuckers to get in the oven.

>>60448957
>kaby lake uses more power

>>60449140
Maybe you should try and learn to spell and/or type before commenting any further, you kike shekelchaser scum.

File: single-socket-holocaust.jpg (28KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 550x550px

>>60449163
Ironically, this is the second time they build their own ovens as well...

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170516_205055.jpg (352KB, 398x837px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 398x837px

>>60449140
Everything.

File: 1481744513695.png (349KB, 716x2588px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 716x2588px

>>60449140
>>60449237

File: mark.jpg (1MB, 1505x4363px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1505x4363px

>>60449140
>>60449245

File: $RA0VZHQ.gif (2MB, 400x291px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 400x291px

GO AMD GO !!!

>>60449163
The biggest thing is the power efficiency and stability at low clocks.

IF they downclock enough they can cram an 8core/16thread chip into a notebook. That would be amazing for mobile music/video production.

>>60449140
Apologize to the English language.

>all of this casual antisemitism

Who knew AMDicksuckers were also /pol-tards ??

>>60450382
Yeah, even though there's one fucking high profile Indian guy working at AMD and all you hear is POO IN LOO over and over from the other side. Totally got us there.

>>60448798
But Intel isn't competitive at all

>>60449592
Any R7 can run at 35w cTDP, which is completely feasible in a laptop
Really few madmen would do such thing though

So, kind of off-topic but will AMD's next line of CPU's; i.e. Zen+ still be using the AM4 socket?

>>60451014
Yes, they're sticking with AM4 for quite awhile. However their HEDT CPUs are going on a new platform. So if you want 16 cores, you need to buy X390/X399.

>>60451068

Ok thanks for the info, I won't be buying any work-station level CPU's

File: AMD-Epic-CPU[1].jpg (52KB, 1179x675px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1179x675px

>>60451014
yes .
these new chips are physically bigger so the socket has to be different. zen+ will be zen core counts but improved

File: boards.4chan.org 1494470048964.gif (365KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2000x1153px

>>60450382
>semites can't handle a bit of bantz from the poos
THIN SKINNED JEWS

File: 1367699457547.jpg (182KB, 500x780px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 500x780px

>>60450382
>/pol/
don't compare us to those bluepilled faggots
/g/ has always been the board that saw through the jew

>>60446534
This is what I'm planning for my new workstation. Was looking at an 1800x but it's not enough of an improvement over my current setup to be worth building a new pc for. A 14 or 16 core chip is much more appealing especially since it won't be starved for pcie lanes like the AM4 chips are. I don't want to have to choose between running a capture card or a second ssd.

>>60446239
You realize Intel is charging $1000 for their 8-cores? A $1000 16-core will absolutely shut Intel out of the HEDT market for years.

>>60436837
Intel has never marketed the E series for gaming

>>60442570
I meant people aren't going to buy a 1600X and then decide they need a 16-core.

File: mega-tasking-example.jpg (61KB, 800x389px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x389px

>>60452546
>He doesn't know
>He doesn't know about the legend of MEGA-TASKING

>>60448278
You're funny anon

>>60448899
Actually the consumer CPUs are using workstation/server-tier dies. There are a bunch of disabled sensors and shit in Ryzen processors.

File: 1385420494989.jpg (325KB, 852x939px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 852x939px

>>60452129
>>60450382
Jew meme has been around way before pol made a big deal out of it
See WWII

>>60442875
Yeah, Intel's going to completely decimate their margins possibly into the negatives. And then get sued by their shareholders. And get prosecuted by the FCC, and get prosecuted for dumping product below market value. Brilliant strategy. You should go work for Intel, for reals.

You'll be lucky if their new mainstream 6 core i7-8700K is under $400.

>>60446552
Nah

>>60452546
Sure they haven't, friend.

>>60452663
Kek.

>>60442462
>but they insist on keeping it for some reason

It's called NSA coercion

Tech sites are getting BTFO

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a87Iy7avG7o

>>60454772
He comes to the conclusion that they're not biased, just idiots.

>>60454873
As I said. BTFO

>>60436760
muh pearallization gains gone be epyc boys

>>60449187
kek, that file name

>>60436760

Retard here, even with a huge number of cores, can all programs even take advantage of this shit? If not, isn't it a shitty thing to rush towards and instead stick with 4/8 core?

Watching task manager I will frequently only see high activity in 4 of the 8 cores whilst gaming.

>>60449187

It's pretty sad that AMD has been so irrelevant for so long that its shill brigade has to reach back to the fucking Pentium 4 to find something to post.

That CPU is older than half the poeple who post this image.

>>60456579

If you're questioning if you even need the cores, then this processor is beyond you.

For those who do need the cores, they know what software they run, what programs will tax it, and why it is necessary.

>>60436760
M O A R
O
A
R

C O A R S
O
A
R
S

File: 1494620862733.jpg (54KB, 493x493px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 493x493px

>>60452572
MEGA-TASKING
>MEGA-TASKING
MEGA-TASKING
>MEGA-TASKING
MEGA-TASKING
>MEGA-TASKING