Beastly Intel Core i9 processors leaked

>>60422015
HOUSE FIRES

>>60422015
>Beastly
>BTFO
All I see in this spec sheet is that AMD is once again the better option just like it's with R5 and R7.

>44lanes across all models
>lower TDP
>weakest R9 has only 2 cores and 4 threads less than the strongest i9
>for some weird reason i9 does not support 3200mhz RAM, will probably be fixed with BIOS
>Clockspeeds aren't that far apart between i9 and R9

Where did Intel BTFO the Ryzen lineup again?

>>60422901
BUT INTel CaN MAKE I Two

IT'S NOT FAIR

>>60422015
Why would someone buy a i5 on a HEDT platform?

>>60422015
If intel release something worth for the first time in 5 years you just have to say thanks to amd.

>>60422015
>mfw intel has been sitting on this for years and only just released it now that amd have brought higher core processors to the table

>>60422015
POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60422015
Ryzen still looks like the winner in this chart, especially when you realize the i9 will cost hundreds more.

>AVX512
Wake me up when it's time to care.

>>60422015
>(((leaked)))

at the prices they're both charging I won't be buying any of it, specially whe I'd need new mb and ram too

dual lga2011 xeons its looking more and more attractive

>>60422015
:(

>>60422901
that single-core performance is going to suck like all ryzen chips so far.

not that it really matters though, nobody should buy a 16 core CPU for gayming

>>60422015
>12 core
>160 W TDP

>>60429810
>Suck
It's about 5-7% behind Skylake on average. Would you say that Haswell's singled threaded performance now sucks?

>>60429913
He would say that NOW as he's a kiketel shekelchaser.

File: 14493760181.jpg (28KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 601x508px

>>60422015
y-yeah! b-btfo intelfags!