Post your speed

>>60368673

I'm from Venezuela

File: fuck.png (10KB, 487x92px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 487x92px

cuck my life into pieces

>>60368673

>133ms

kek fucking third world

File: 5153.jpg (15KB, 480x106px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x106px

>>60368673
I wish I was joking

File: 2017-05-10 01_54_27-.png (6KB, 305x97px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 305x97px

>>60368793
scoot over

>>60368827

Kek where are you from?

>>60368884
Spain lmao, I live in the countryside so it's kind of hard to get a good+stable connection

File: fdgdf.jpg (12KB, 484x97px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 484x97px

whats first world when you have no money?

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-13 at 18.13.05.png (221KB, 1260x1907px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1260x1907px

Can I somehow report shit servers that apparently have 100mbit limit?

File: burgersbtfo.png (20KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x200px

>>60368673
I pay 4 bucks for this, 5 with television.

File: 6294873752.png (22KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x200px

>>60368673

File: 6294886131.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

jew isp doesn't want to give faster speeds than 100/100

i guess i should be happy though considering they built fiber here where i live (rural area) and all there was before was 8/1 ADSL and it works as advertised

>>60370121
>did you just post your coordinates?

>>60370108
100/100 is fine for 1-3 people. 4+ however I'd start feeling constrained.

I had 150mbps until January when my ISP finally started offering residential gigabit service.

>>60369859
the fuck where are you?

>>60372820
>oradea
Romania

File: 6295184179.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

pay around 4$ for this

>>60372966
I pay 24.5× that a month($98) for my internet. (Mine >>60368830)

>>60373021
And have ~24 times faster download and upload speed. Where are you from with this high speed connection?

>>60373093
Washington DC

File: test.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

Fucking americans and their snail based telecoms infrastructure.

File: speeds.png (52KB, 1239x670px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 1239x670px

>>60368673
I pay 22 EUR/month for this. But it's supposed to be 500 down and 500 up.
Am I getting ripped off?

>>60373164
Lol?
This is the Nation's capital >>60368830
Under $100 a month for gigabit + Tv +phone.

Besides as I'm sure you're well aware the vast majority of the UK gets fucked on internet.

File: 2017-05-14-001014_714x67_scrot.png (41KB, 714x67px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 714x67px

not bad considering i am a literal pajeetstani

>>60373198
Ripped off? Hardly. But your ISP is over selling their bandwidth and that's why aren't seeing full speeds. But you're still faster than 90% of your countrymen.

File: 18782.jpg (22KB, 739x275px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 739x275px

this speed is fundamental human rights

File: dat_ping.png (185KB, 2140x1487px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 2140x1487px

>>60368673

>dat ping

>>60373301
If that's a 10gbps connection I feel bad for you.

On a related note I can get 2gbps residential fiber for only $150 a month in the US.

File: test.png (29KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 300x135px

>>60373204

Look carefully at >>60373164

> linode

I'm just fucking with you.

That's my server.

My actual speed is shite today. (image relevant)

And the speedtest server is hosted by my ISP.

Apparently the trick to getting a decent price on internet in the UK is to leave, get into the month notice period, then wait for a call from the disconnections department. They can give some decent deals (if they can't give you the same for less, they can usually give you more for the same price).

I'll be trying that soon for sure.

But to be honest, UK internet isn't like american shit, they really get screwed over for internet.

File: omg.png (16KB, 722x272px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 722x272px

>>60373301
Get on my level.

>>60373404
>But to be honest, UK internet isn't like american shit, they really get screwed over for internet.
The only ones getting screwed are the ones living where there is little to no population density.

East coast or west coast cities and suburbs have great internet.

>>60373454

I guess the question is then: at what cost?

>>60373634
Regional. But general the closer to a population center the cheaper it'll be.

Like I said earlier, I've got 1gbps + tv + house phone, for $98/ month.

File: sketch-1494703247054.png (577KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

577KB, 1080x1920px

20 bucks a month. No limits and they don't give a shit about torrenting/piracy.

> mfw pk has better internet than you

>>60374206
Why do they dick you on upload?

>>60374364

Legal reasons because its a telephone COOP.

>>60374403
Are co-op's legally limited to not provide decent upload speeds?

The only thing I can think is it's to discourage someone from trying to host a server or something in their house. But simply notifying problem customers would be a better option than limiting EVERYONE to 1/10th of 1gbps.

>>60374465

The real answer is they use GPONS which have a MAXIMUM of 1.244 Gbits/s upstream. Due to this, they could never meet a gig upload for legal purposes. Even though each line is dedicated to the PON itsel, it would have to be provisioned at a rate incapable for this pon type.

However, even 300 or 500 would be more feasible.

>>60374801
I'm on GPON with Verizon FiOS
>>60368830

Unless Verizon deployed XG-PON2 (synchronous 10gbps NG-PON2) early without telling anyone. Which they didn't do. They're offering synchronous 1gbps (advertised as 940/880 mbps)

File: speedy speed boi.jpg (19KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 350x200px

>>60368673
>Canadian internet

>>60375040
>offering synchronous 1gbps (advertised as 940/880 mbps)
I should add, while they advertise as 940/880mbps, they provision 1024/1024mbps at the GPON node.

>>60368673
What do you use?
Speedtesdt.net

>>60373990
That's slower than my phone and that ping is awful

>>60373990
Now post results from a machine with a wired connection.

>>60375112
>>60374206
Asymmetric gigabit connections should be illegal

>third world shithole
>wired connection

>>60375210
for
>>60375193

File: SmartSelectImage_2017-04-29-21-41-28.png (255KB, 886x1099px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 886x1099px

>>60368830
>tfw limited to under 600mbps WiFi due to only having 1x1 or 2x2 antenna devices.
Oh well Ethernet exists for a reason

>>60375210
>>60375230
Don't you have a router at your place or is this 3G/4G?

>>60375261
I'm not him, I'm just implying that people in most 3rd world shitholes like India and Pakistan mainly use 3G/4G and some $50 chink phone for their online needs which is why Whatsapp is so popular

An actual wired connection is a luxury for most people where basic shit like electricity can go out whenever. Wireless is just easier and more reliable

File: file.png (107KB, 1288x727px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1288x727px

>>60375194
I agree

>>60375330
Boy I sure am glad I'm a white American.

I'm born, I'll live, and I'll die all without experiencing that level of poverty.

File: Screenshot_20170513-132706.png (785KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 1080x1920px

$30 tmobile

File: speed.png (18KB, 803x454px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 803x454px

>>60368830
>>60369993
Hello fiberbros

>>60375254
I just realized speed are affected by router and phone.

>>60375343
>1.2gbps
Testing error or did you actually shell out for 10gbps NICs and switches etc?

>>60375374
This is the current state of /g/

>>60375382
nah it's the built in test on the modem with the fibre connection
That extra 250mbps is probably for the 4k TV

File: Screenshot_2017-05-13-23-24-35~01.png (42KB, 800x1031px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 800x1031px

Should I anhero?

>>60375374
Yup, my ISP provided router has a 3x3 802.11AC setup that provides 1.3gbps peak.
But there are better routers or access points with up to around 7gbps being the max available right now.

However most consumer devices only use 1x1, 2x2, and newer laptops and phones might have 3x3 and very rarely 4x4 antennas.

Only 3x3 and 4x4 will see speeds approaching 1gbps or more.


Though even if your devices aren't 3x3 or 4x4 a higher end router will still provide better coverage to lower end or older 1x1 and 2x2 devices.

>>60375449
But my speed doesn't exceed 100 mbps

>>60370108
Why is Finnish internet so slow?

>>60375371
How long have you had yours? It's only been a few weeks for me but I can't see myself going back to anything slower unless I'm forced to at gunpoint.

>>60375481
Then don't worry about it unless you're doing local wireless file transfers

>>60375508
Um I'm doing that.
Small files though, less than 50MB

>>60375611
Yea not a huge deal for 50mb. I've got a fairly sizeable collection of 10-30GB MKVs that I like being able to steam wirelessly on my local network. But I'm obviously an extreme case.

>>60375040

Right, because the limitations of GPONS upstream, they cannot offer symettrical. As I said, they can offer something better than 100 Mbps though.

You will never get over 900 Mbp/s on a GPon. Really, you'll more than likely see something around 800. However, still better than 100.

>>60375194
I hope you understand it's a limitation of the Fiber PON type. Nothing to do with the teleco being asses.

>>60375371
Kalibri.

>>60375382
Some isps are now offering 2 Gbp/s. Need 10 Gbe hardware of course.

File: 1420026124758.jpg (49KB, 1024x752px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 1024x752px

Is ping related to download speed?
Can you have low ping in range of 80-100ms with download speed of 200 kbps?

>>60375668
>You will never get over 900 Mbp/s on a GPon. Really, you'll more than likely see something around 800. However, still better than 100.
I linked you to a result of 920+ but hey, whatever you say senpai. Ive seen it peak at 1022mbps upload.

>>60375668
>I hope you understand it's a limitation of the Fiber PON type. Nothing to do with the teleco being asses.
So then they shouldn't advertise fully symmetric gigabit internet

>>60375649
I noticed that when I tried to play a 1GB file wirelessly.
Not anymore, with wanna decrypt around.

>>60375682
Ping is the response time
You can have a gigabit connection, but if your ping is like 100+ you're gonna have a shit time playing CS:GO

File: Speedutestu.png (8KB, 502x103px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 502x103px

35€ per month
no datacap
no dns censorship
free cable tv

will upgrade to 1Gb/s symmetrical for 45€ soon

>>60375682
Not directly, but slower types of internet (dialup, DSL, ADSL, etc) are usually further removed from the internet fiber backbone that connects everything together. So even though a DSL connection COULD provide low ping in the optimum circumstances, in real world scenarios they tend to have garbage ping results.

>>60375736
So it's not related to download speed?
Then what can I do to improve the ping?

>>60375736
I thankfully have 1gbps AND 5ms ping in CSGO official servers.
Best of both worlds

>>60375777
Assuming you don't have some retarded setup at home with a double NAT or even a triple NAT situation, nothing besides changing to a provider with tech

>>60375775
I'm asking because I have great ping but shit download speed.

File: 6295447010.png (20KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 350x200px

http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6295447010

>>60375668
>Some isps are now offering 2 Gbp/s. Need 10 Gbe hardware of course.
Yea Comcast keeps trying to sell me on the 2gbps for $149.99 plan, but I told them only if they pay for install fees ($500) and activation fees (another $500).
I then explained to them I'd still have to pay out anther $1000 upgrading my network to 10gbps equipment.

So far they've refused. So fuck em. I'll keep my 1gbps for now.

File: 1426813301991.png (493KB, 750x750px) Image search: [Google]

493KB, 750x750px

Since most people here are savvy to internet and network.
Hours do I know if my ISP is following Ney Neutrality?

>>60375854
I mean it makes sense if you have a lot of people using the internet at the same time, suppose if you and and a bunch of people are in video creation and are uploading and downloading hundreds of gigabytes of data every day, but for the home user 1 gigabit is more than enough

>>60375895
Please speak American.

>>60375490
I've had it since february. My lease was up so I moved to a place that I knew had it.
I will literally NEVER move from Atlanta unless this service is available elsewhere for the same price ($70).
>>60375668
>>60375854
Comcast keeps sending me offers for that shit too. I think they're just trying to fool most normies because 2 > 1, 149 = ~ 2x70.

>>60375827
Then you're lucky, most people with shit download and upload also have terrible ping, but as you know it's not required to have good speeds for good ping.

Ping is simply a function of distance between you and the server

File: firefox_2017-05-07_13-14-59.png (15KB, 574x177px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 574x177px

hello fellow fiberbros

>>60375944
>Comcast keeps sending me offers for that shit too. I think they're just trying to fool most normies because 2 > 1, 149 = ~ 2x70.
Yup around here it's $70 for gigabit for new customers with Verizon, or $94.99 with TV and phone and gigabit.

Comcast charges $299 a month for 2gbps if you live where 1gbps isn't available, but if you've got 1gbps available they'll offer 2gbps for $149.99 instead

But no one needs those speeds on a residential non-business line.

File: 2017-05-13-140456_3840x1080_scrot.png (23KB, 732x273px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 732x273px

Better than it has been. Trial area and cock sucking for some recent political shit going down.

>>60376057
Ayy, fellow Verizon fiber bro.

What price?

>>60375927
What you described is closer to working at home than anything else, you should negociate with your isp for a dedicated fiber line with pro support. You will also be able to put the bill on your society expenses.

>>60376141
$110

>>60376228
nice sounds like HD essential + digital voice + gigabit and maybe a STB rental.

>>60368697
Rip

>>60368827
Hehehhe 420
>>60368830
Spotted the Google Fiber guy

File: 1.jpg (19KB, 697x71px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 697x71px

It gets faster every year but it should get a nice boost in 2018 because of a new submarine cable.

90 mbps down
12 mbps up

i pay for 200mbps down
love comcast

>>60377048
>Spotted the Google Fiber guy
Actually Verizon

File: dat download.webm (2MB, 1060x631px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1060x631px

>>60376057

>>60368830
>what country
>what provider
>what city
>how much does it cost

File: real world 1gbps.jpg (93KB, 1162x468px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1162x468px

>>60378387
>what country
USA
>what provider
Verizon FiOS
>what city
Suburb of Washington DC
>how much does it cost
$94.99 a month with tax comes out around $105.

>>60378403
So to get fast internet i have to live around a bunch of niggers and pay $100 monthly

gay

>>60378481
>live around a bunch of niggers
>washington DC

you haven't seen housing prices in DC in the past 2 decades have you?

Not to mention I live in Potomac MD which is one of the richest towns in the entire country.

File: chrome_2017-05-13_19-19-37.png (259KB, 1350x430px) Image search: [Google]

259KB, 1350x430px

>>60378554
that like saying milwaukee is a good place to live because of east side if full of rich whites and asians, doesn't take away from that fact the fact that whites are minorities in both dc and milwaukee

File: ayylmao.png (3KB, 610x93px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 610x93px

BACK OFF ILL TAKE YOU ON

File: speed test.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

I pay $30 for this shit.

Though Comcast is apparently prepping to install gigabit in my area, anyone here have any experience with that?

File: speedtest.png (22KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 350x200px

>>60368673
tfw you thought you'd be pwned by others. end up having the highest speed here? wtf?

File: speed.png (11KB, 707x128px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 707x128px

It's business class at least so no download cap. 9I already downloaded 8tb of anime please send help)

File: Life is suffering.png (7KB, 483x98px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 483x98px

Someone please kill me.
>tfw posting this took a couple of minutes because captcha wouldn't load

>>60379015
>what is PG county

Yea they aren't anywhere near NW DC and the part of MD i'm in.

Is Spectrum going to offer better uploads? I mean 60 down is cool, but I'd really like higher uploads than 5.

Fucking Phillipine ISP

>manila
>5mbps
>PLDT dsl
>$35
>intermittent

JUST

>>60375895
Phoneposters leave

How important is upload speed for the average internet user? Obviously if you upload youtube videos regularly or something than its important but if the most you do is upload the occasional webm to 4chan how important is it?

>>60380409
As a mud chink your ISP should be the least of your worries

>>60380705
Really going to depend on your habits, it's not super important, but it makes working from home or dealing with moving around large files painless.

Synchronous fiber should be mandatory for cities in 2017.

File: 1435379188174.jpg (175KB, 736x1186px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 736x1186px

How do I know if my ISP is following Net neutrality?

File: hjklkjljkhlkjlhjkl.png (9KB, 498x118px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 498x118px

eh, its not the best but my roommates are also using it soo

>>60381675

who are these semen demons

File: speed.png (8KB, 496x104px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 496x104px

Spectrum

File: 6296334595.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

Can't wait for the rollout of the severely neutered and bastardized NBN in my area.

File: Screenshot_20170514-192959.png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2560px

FTTP, paying for 100mb down 40 up

The NBN is already congested.

File: 1492730869103.png (67KB, 462x680px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 462x680px

>10$ internet in moscow
>5$ lithuanian vpn

paying for 100/40 on FTTP NBN

>>60386015
NBN is such a disgrace, it had s much potential if they'd just been investing in the proper infrastructure.

>>60381675
What makes you think that?

Can someone here help me out? I live in a house with 5 people who stream and play online. Is their a type of internet I can get that will let me play online with no lag? Ive got the money, just dont know what plan to get! My upload speed is around 200kb

>>60387620
You need to look for ping the lower the ping the better.
You can get an internet with 100Gbps but with +900 ms ping.

>>60387620
Depends where you live.

The main hubs of internet in the US are Chicago, NYC and Northern VA, and Los Angeles/Silicon valley.

If you live in Alabma or North Dakota, it really doesn't matter what internet you decide to switch to, many things online will have shit ping for you simply because where you are geographically located.

>>60387702
>>60387654
My ping is mainly around 30-70. Does upload speed have a factor with online gaming?

>>60387739
Not really no, most games only send small bits of data to update your in game position and where you're aiming, it's generally only a few Kb/s.

Someone with 5mbps upload can have 5ms ping if they live close to the server, and someone with 1000mbps upload can have 100ms ping because they just live further away.

>>60387765
So ping are unrelated to download speed.
Then what about different ISP?

>>60387792
Ping is how long it takes your packet to reach the server, and then return to your computer.


So ping is essentially telling you how far away you are from the server.


It can also be affected by your ISPs internal routing, if their internal network is configured in a shit way, your ping will be increased as you are essentially bouncing around your ISPs internal network for awhile until they finally deliver your packets to the server you're actually trying to connect to.


So you have two options.

1.
Move

2.
Switch ISPs and see if they are any better. But this might not work, so that sends you back to option 1.

>>60387831
Not him.
Does downloading effect the ping?
I've switched ISP recently while the new one have better ping 80-110 ms.
I have shitty speeds 100 kbps - 800 kbps.
I'm thinking of sacrificing ping for download speed.

>>60387954
With speeds under ~15mbps, yes downloads will effect ping. So lets say you've got someone watching youtube while you're gaming. Everytime youtube goes to buffer, it will try to draw your entire 15mbps, during that time your ping in games will be shit because your ENTIRE download bandwidth is being used by youtube.

With my speeds that isn't really the case. I can download at 500-700mbps and still have plenty of bandwidth available for games.


Further at higher congestion (with more simultaneous users) a router can be congested with too many requests at once which will cause higher ping for everyone. You can get around this with a higher end router that has more processing power, or if you have a lot of $ you can build your own enterprise grade router (or buy one) and implement packet shaping that can essentially detect when you're playing a game and specifically allow packets from your game to be processed BEFORE any other traffic on your network. This type of feature generally isn't available on lower end consumer routers however.

>>60388037
>plenty of bandwidth
I keep hearing about this.
How do I know my bandwidth? My ISP doesn't tell me and say it's unlimited.

>>60388037
What about the other way around?
Does playing online game affect your download speed?

File: cykapower.png (18KB, 300x78px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 300x78px

>>60368673
>Glorious Mother Russia
>8 dollars for this

>>60388061
Depends what we're talking about.

I'll use myself as an example as it's the situation i'm most familiar with.


I have 1gbps of bandiwdth. My ISP provisions me 1024/1024 mbps at their local node. From that node there are 4 households sharing a 2.4gbps download link and a 1.2gbps upload link, this node link goes directly to my ISP's local data center a few miles away. From that data center the connection goes into my ISPs fiber backbone on huge 10-40gbps server connections.

So at ANY of these points, there could be congestion.

At my house I have 1gbps bandwidth available. My local node has 2.4/1.2gbps bandwidth, and my local data center likely has a 40/10gbps or 40/40gbps bandwidth.

If you think of your internet as a pipe supplying water (internet), then how wide the pipe is, is your bandwidth. The wider the pipe, the more you can get at once.


So your available bandwidth would be the maximum upload and download speed you can achieve.


>>60388078
No, not really. Technically it could, but most people will have enough download speed available that it shouldn't necessarily effect usage. No current games that I can think of would need more than ~3mbps.

>>60387492
B-but if we did that, then Telstra would literally lose hundreds of millions! We wouldn't want that~

File: 6112673004.png (23KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 350x200px

>>60368673

>>60388156
>bandwidth
I see.
Then how do I know how many households are sharing with me?
Logically if those are downloading it could affect my download speed, right?
Obviously my ISP isn't giving me unlimited bandwidth, since my download speed fluctuate greatly between day and night.

File: 인터넷스피드.png (9KB, 709x103px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 709x103px

>>60368673

>>60388220
The only way I know is I asked my ISPs technician how they were offering 1gbps because their previous provisioning was 2.4gbps download and 1.2gbps upload shared between 16 households. He said they expanded each node and moved the households around so it was 4 per node instead of 16 like it used to be.


Most ISPs don't publicly disclose their network topology sadly.

File: 1488944988334.jpg (91KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 500x500px

Holy fuck. I didn't even know it was POSSIBLE to get your speed that high...

God it fucking sucks living in [spoiler]Puerto Rico[/spoiler]

File: 2017-05-14 (2).png (15KB, 693x111px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 693x111px

Jewed on upload as always

>>60388728
I can think of many reasons why it would suck to live in Puerto Rico these days.

>>60388766
>Takes screenshot with phone
my sides

File: speed.png (11KB, 561x127px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 561x127px

>>60368673
filthy ISP I pay for 5 Mbit upload

>>60388260
No way to scan it?

What difference changing the servers do in the speed test?

File: IMG_20170514_233617.jpg (56KB, 1077x490px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 1077x490px

i think my isp is pulling dodgy shit here as its usually 6/0.4. fuck Australia honestly.

File: 6296940844[1].png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

Meh, also I don't live in Gospit

>>60389048
Some servers suck, some international channels suck, see >>60369287

>>60389268
Then how does it make a difference your ISP doesn't allow to change servers.

>>60389316
Wait, what does it have to do with ISPs?

>>60388964
No. They provision your speed to a certain limit and that's it. You can't detect what sort of speeds they have further up the link.

>>60389316
Do you understand how the internet works at a base level?

Verizon and ATT are bTFO'ing most Yuro ISP's.

Seems like only they provide gigabit

File: Screenshot_2017-05-14_18-28-23.png (9KB, 485x113px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 485x113px

>>60389349
Yes.
It seems each server is related to an ISP.
Funny thing is when choosing the server that correspond my current ISP I get pic related.
But the real speed are much less when tested with fast.com, or when I use servers of different ISP.
Is my ISP prioritizing the speed test traffic to get fake results?

>>60389378
Yea because Americans expect to get what's advertised. At&t or Verizon could have offered "gigabit" service years ago like the europoors but it would be 400-700mbps at best because of shitty GPON limitations.
Now however they can do cheap GPON and actually afford to give real 900mbps+ symmetrical gigabit service.

If Verizon had offered gigabit 5 years ago and only delivered 500mbps, people would've been pissed, so they waited until it was cheap and easy enough that they could easily give full gigabit speeds for a decent price (compared to others in the US)

>>60389377
No?
I understand what you see on web browser is just HTML files hosted on someone's else computer and how does it get served to me.
What I don't understand how do I connect from my computer to the internet, or how does my ISP get access to internet.
Computer > router > Nanostation (broadband) > ISP tower > small ISP > big ISP > internet
It's after the Nanostation is what I don't understand.

>>60389410
Weird that you aren't getting 100Mbit to your ISPs server, fucking jews limit even internal connections. Here in Russia such ISP would lose all customers instantly.

>>60389476
Your ISP acts as a middleman and "downloads" what you request and sends it to you.

Is there a version not requiring flash?

>>60389512

beta.speedtest.net

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-14 at 18.57.47.png (28KB, 728x450px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 728x450px

>>60389512
Maybe

>>60389512
it doesn't require flash unless you specifically go to he legacy site.

File: 2017-05-14_18-03-42.png (8KB, 503x92px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 503x92px

>>60389538
Thanks!

>>60389508
>would lose all customers instantly.
Lose to whom?
All those different ISP get the internet from the same ISP.
Big corporate ISP provide internet to small ISP which in turn provide to end users.
The rate limiting is the small ISP, god knows how many people share the same connection as you.
The big ISP advertise that no more than 10, there are other plans but a bit expensive that claims it doesn't share your connection.

>>60389508
They provision speed at the local connection a few miles from his house, the speedtest server is located at the ISPs major data center, not a small local hub. So the internal server is getting full speeds just fine, but when your connection speed is provisioned before it even hits that part of their internal network so of course it's not going to report 100mb/s+. He probably pays for 5 or 10mbps

>>60389511
I got that.
I mean can my ISP throttle me on purpose?

>>60389664
>He probably pays for 5 or 10mbps
My ISP claim unlimited bandwidth.
connection speed vary throughout the day from 200 kbps to 1mbps

>>60389665
Of course.

Most people pay for a certain speed teir.

My ISP has several
50mbps
100mbps
150mbps
300mbps
500mbps
And 1gbps

The guy paying for 50mbps could just as easily get 500mbps from the same connection if he pays more money.


When I upgraded from 150mbps to 1gbps it took only 1 hour for them to update my speeds. No technician had to come out because it was already set up for those speeds

>>60389544

For some reason now my Chrome goes to the legacy flash site.

I guess after a certain amount of visits a site becomes "trusted" and Chrome allows flash.

>>60389720
Then your ISP means they don't have a data cap. It doesn't mean the speeds are unlimited just that you can download as much as you want, at those slow speeds

>>60389664
>>60389646
For example all of Moscow and nearby urban areas were pretty much one huge lan with at least 100mbit and some ISPs even having gigabit peering for over a decade now.
Peering area and speed was always an important factor for all non-retards when they pick among small ISPs available. (retards just go with state-controlled "free" landline bundle with no peering)

My ISP provide a site your you can see your connection and how long you have until it expires.
Currently it display "Can't access the site"
But you enable NoScript I get this

"Are you sure you want to disable the renewal of your active speed, the system will no longer activate the current speed for the next period and you will have NO SERVICE, unless you have selected new speed package for the next period "

Any idea what does it mean?

>>60389784
The US fiber backbone is such that this isn't really a big concern. Add to that most areas are serviced by one or two mega corporations and the peering in this country is generally top notch.

I can ping Los Angeles from Washington DC and get ~60-70ms that's a distance of ~4300km

>>60379319
prepare to pay 3x the price for a small increase in speed

>>60379319
Around me they offer 300mbps or 2gbps.


No 1gbps option and the 2gbps option is $149.99 a month + $1000 install.

>>60389844
By peering I mean it's treated as single LAN by clients. No firewalls, no NATs, no port, speed or bandwidth restrictions. People used to run hundreds of multi-terabyte FTP servers and DC hubs for piracy back when actual internet was limited and/or metered. Some of these servers still exist but lesspeople use those since they can just torrent anything with less effort.

>>60389784
>one huge LAN
Wanna decrypt?

>>60389784
>Peering area and speed was always an important factor for all non-retards when they pick among small ISPs available.
Care to explain more?
This sound like piracy gold mine.

>>60389946
Then you're using peering incorrectly, at least from my US perspective.

Here the biggest peering issues we've had in the past decade was Verizon and Comcast refusing to upgrade their backend for traffic to Netflix and YouTube and demanding Netflix and YouTube pay to upgrade the backend of the ISP instead of the ISP making the proper infrastructure upgrades themselves.

This lead to an increase of VPN usage as the VPN providers peering to Netflix and YouTube was always superior.

>>60390022
Kek satellite?

>>60389959
Well yes, that was always a problem for people without home routers or with dmz. Pretty sure if you try to install XP onto a directly connected machine you'll get a dozen of viruses before the installation finishes.

>>60389984
It is. Or was, I did't bother with DC for years now, but I know people who are still active there. ISPs themselves used to run DC hubs and public-write FTPs for their customers.

>>60390014
Peering in Russia is when my ISP and your ISP say they want to be friends and offer uncapped gigabit between us even though we are each on 10mbps plans.

>>60390038
No DSL with the first station in the village beyond the the village i happen to live outside of... fucking cancerous plus they have a monopoly here

>>60390086
>ISPs themselves used to run DC hubs and public-write FTPs for their customers.
Does this violate DMCA?

>>60390152
Sucks, i used to live in a village (~180 ppl) but we had decent cable wut 25mbps (for like $150 a month though)

Who pays the bills?
Isn't +50$ for Internet is expensive?

>>60390196 It does. That's why all of this hubs is dead since 2010

File: mess-with-michael-bay-and-you-mess-with-america.jpg (66KB, 550x424px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 550x424px

>>60390196
> a United States copyright law

>>60390253
$50 even $100 for internet is nothing when I'm nearing $2,000 a month for my rent alone.

>>60390292
>I'm nearing $2,000 a month for my rent alone
That's why I live with my parents.

ISP No. 1
>80kbps, 20ms ping
ISP No. 2
>500kbps, 900ms ping
What to do?

>>60390759
Pretty sure you'll get better result with 3G, not to mention LTE

>>60390322
It's not a bad idea if you can swing it. Certainly far cheaper.

File: Screenshot_2017-05-14_18-26-38.png (10KB, 494x104px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 494x104px

>>60391178
Get on my level.

File: 9mmvsBallisticGel.gif (2MB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 288x288px

>>60391477
God damn, That is just criminal.

File: large.jpg (27KB, 463x462px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 463x462px

>tfw just upgraded from 3/1 to 100/10 and my speeds are still 3/1

How long does this usually take?

>>60368747
Cox?

is anyone getting some lower frames?
i usually get a solid 60 but now im getting weird shit like drops to 40 and itll go to 70 sometimes and i get a lot of screen tearing now

>>60391516
I'm paying 55$ for it.

File: Screen Shot 2017-05-14 at 1.55.09 PM.png (59KB, 410x628px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 410x628px

@100mph senpai

>>60368747
>9 ms

lucky bastard

>>60391524
Reboot your router.

File: IMG_2316.png (1MB, 750x1334px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 750x1334px

Upgrading to 200mbps on the 26th.
Can your computer affect the internet speed you get? Ran a speed test on my phone and a macbook pro (pic related results) - both connected to wifi. But I ran the same test on my shitty laptop (which is connected via powerline ethernet) and only get half the speed.

>>60391717
Yes. If you have a slower adapter you'll notice. Software, cable quality/comp will affect your shit

>>60391717
Yes, not just your client devices (phones, desktops, laptops, etc) your router can bottleneck you as well. Though at only 200mbps I doubt you'll be bottlenecked except maybe on WiFi depending how old the router is.

I know from upgrading to 1gbps recently some older Marvell NICs capped out at 400mbps despite being a "gigabit" NIC

>>60391905
My router's gigabit - paid money to get a good ASUS one.

My main desktop has a gigabit LAN port, and I'm looking to get 1200mbps powerline adapters (drilling isn't an option) with Cat7 cables (overkill, I know). That should get me full utilisation, right?

>>60391937
On 200mbps? Yea shouldn't be a problem.

I get 940mbps+ using my ISP provided router and CAT5e over ~50 feet and through 2 1GbE switches.

So you should be fine.

How do you become small ISP?
It seems like there's a good money in being one.

File: IMG_20170426_235531.jpg (25KB, 664x227px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 664x227px

Not mine but i'm jelly, and it's just a dick contest anyway

>>60392129
Getting fucked on that upload though

I wish anyone with over 25mbps would die

>>60392870
I wish anyone with over 1 mbps would suffer from priapism.

Which is accurate?
fast.com or speedtest.net?

>>60392909
I'm at 3mbps and it's still shit. Which is why I said 25+

>>60392938
Depends.

Speedtest.net uses nearby servers that may or may not be owned by your ISP, if they are then your results could be skewed to give your ISP favorable results.

Fast.com uses Netflix servers and will tell you your speeds to Netflix servers only.

>>60392951
>I'm at 3mbps and it's still shit
How is it possible?
What are you using it that ~350 KB/sec isn't good enough?

>>60392992
Any sort of web browsing that isn't the most basic shit is painful.

Any sort of video streaming is shit, especially if HD.

>>60392991
Doesn't this means fast.com is better?
Unless your ISP is violating net neutrality.

>>60392991
Are there speed test that uses google/youtube servers?

>>60393074
Just Google "speedtest" it runs off the closest Google server.

>>60393015
No not necessarily. Fast.com gives me 750mbps, speedtest.net gives 940mbps, but I can download games from steam at 880mbps and star citizen updates at 920mbps.

So which is accurate? 750mbps? Or 940mbps?

Truth is it just depends what server you're connected to.

File: speedtest.png (32KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 300x135px

My youknee used to host a speedtest server

>>60390322
I'm happy there's no stigma in my country about doing this. In a few years they will be old enough I'll have to help them and then I will be even seen as a good reliable son for living with them. Would suck in America though.

>>60393135
>No not necessarily. Fast.com gives me 750mbps, speedtest.net gives 940mbps, but I can download games from steam at 880mbps and star citizen updates at 920mbps.
>So which is accurate? 750mbps? Or 940mbps?
>Truth is it just depends what server you're connected
Meant for>>60393056

File: 6297374989.png (31KB, 300x135px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x135px

why is upload always so low?

>>60393135
>Just Google "speedtest"

>>60393499
DOCSIS

>>60393056
>violating net neutrality
Only if the ISP demands money from certain sites.
My ISP for example throttle all connections with the exception of facebook and youtube.
I can get speed like 400KB/sec from youtube, but 10KB/sec from the rest.

File: SmartSelectImage_2017-05-14-15-56-06.png (276KB, 1347x1229px) Image search: [Google]

276KB, 1347x1229px

>>60393525
Yes?

>>60393575
>he thinks google give same results for different users.

>>60393631
I mean it's a built in tool on Google when you just type speedtest. It's not a search result you retard. The only reason it wouldn't show up is if you're foreign.

>>60393575
>500 kb/sec

>>60393533
the wiki says
>...Tables assume 256-QAM modulation for downstream and 64-QAM for upstream...

so why don't they also use the 256-qam for upstream?

but honestly idk what qam is... just curious why my upload is always so low compared to download

>>60393667
Feel free to educate yourself further.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/broadband-cable/data-over-cable-service-interface-specifications-docsis/19220-data-thruput-docsis-world-19220.html#us

File: 2017-05-14 14_04_45-Clipboard.png (15KB, 521x234px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 521x234px

>>60368673
>First-party government services are a bad thing
This ISP is owned by our city government. We struggled to implement it because Comcast lobbied against us, and fortunately lost the second time. Now early adopters pay $50/mo FOR LIFE for this, and will let you move anywhere within the city and keep your rate.

File: Capture.png (80KB, 702x113px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 702x113px

>>60368673
Is this internets acceptable or am I a
c u c k.
Live in South Africa.

File: _20170514_211007.jpg (29KB, 725x273px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 725x273px

>>60368673
R8 me faggots

>>60393711
>The CMTS must service these Requests, check the availability of the MAP scheduler, and queue it up for the next unicast transmit opportunity. This back-and-forth communication, which is mandated by the DOCSIS protocol, produces such latency.

i just skimmed through the upstream part but that's the cause for low upstream correct? cuz it gotta service all of these requests?
anyways, interesting but i g2g

>>60393803
Nice ping
How much do you pay
I'm a londonfag and pay £30/$45us for this
>>60393809

>>60393852
Essentially it MUST have slower upload in order to give the central office tone to interpret the upstream signals from everyone else.


If it were unrestricted sure youd get more bandwidth but you tie up the central office with just your traffic and everyone else gets fucked.


The long and short of it is without laying a ton of extra cables you're limited on upload speed significantly.

>>60393869
2000 ZAR - around 115 GBP :)))))

>>60393940
A year or month?

>>60394027
Monthly.
:O

File: holy shit.png (75KB, 724x122px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 724x122px

I'd like to state that I am less than 50m away from the test server

>>60393803
>>60393940
I'm sure it's fine for South Africa. But I pay $20 less for 1gbps

>>60394088
>less than 50m
Meters?

Even satellite should have lower ping

>>60394120
Yes meters.
Please kill me

>>60394270
I would kill you but I doubt id be able to hit you because of the latency.

File: zwischennetzgeschwindigkeit.png (20KB, 737x263px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 737x263px

Paying 30 Euro per month including landline and TV.

File: 6297485673.png (21KB, 350x200px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 350x200px

>>60392129
French here, is this the Orange public offer ?
Mine is bottlenecked at ~945mbps down and ~245 up

>>60394821
And it's a 50$ FTTH line in France

>>60394852
945mbps is basically the maximum a 1GbE NIC can transfer TCP/IP packets using normal frame size.

Roughly 5.5% overhead for TCP/IP which means 1000mbps is at maximum throughput ~945mbps

File: 2017-04-29 01_21_28-Speedtest by Ookla - The Global Broadband Speed Test.png (8KB, 503x90px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 503x90px

>>60395039
correct

File: speedtest.png (7KB, 350x65px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 350x65px

>>60375371
Fiberbro checking in.

Fast enough to get to you mom's house AND to your GF's afterward!

File: weefee.png (93KB, 868x134px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 868x134px

My router offers both 2.5G and 5G.
But I don't know numbers so am I good or bad.