ITS FUCKING HAPPENING

can i play minecraft with that?

File: 1494657433049-g.jpg (95KB, 900x597px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 900x597px

>>60362522

File: 300px-360CE-01.jpg (16KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x225px

>>60362522
> X-series
> 79XX
> Going to cost at the very least 1200 USD

Nothing to see here.

File: IMG_3452.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

>>60362544
YOU ARE FOREVER BTFO AUTISTIC STREET SHITTER

INSANE SINGLE CORE PERFORMANCE AND INSANE MULTI CORE

>>60362544
LOL anyone with half a ball can get a kaby with its shit TIMMY at under 70 STRESS LOAD

with a new TIMMY these motherfuckers gonna put bulldriver 3.0 on notice

File: minecraft gaming rig.jpg (171KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 960x1280px

>>60362536
ofc

>>60362522
>tdp
>price
>AMD has cheaper, higher core/thread on the way

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-16-12-core-x399-whitehaven-cpus-leaked/

Intel kill lol

File: IMG_3472.png (1MB, 1440x1042px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x1042px

>>60362582
>3.4ghz max clock

The only one that's kill is amd

>>60362522
>New CPU from one company
>HOW WILL OTHER COMPANY EVER RECOVER BANKRUPTCY BANKRUPTCY

fuck off

AMD is also releasing 16 core cpus soon.


AMD's releasing 16 core CPUs soon.

>Literally Pentium 4 Extreme Edition 2.0

top kek

>>60362628
16 core running at 3ghz whilst intels 12 cores will most likely do over 5ghz

>>60362582
where you getting your price nums from?

>>60362650
>7700k only overclocks to 5.0Ghz with a delid.

>>60362650
>12 cores will most likely do over 5ghz

Is this the new Prescott?

File: IMG_3375.jpg (188KB, 1354x1074px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1354x1074px

>>60362667
Bullpoo

File: amd1.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

>>60362522
THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING

>>60362681
say goodbye to warranty.

>>60362628
amd had a good run but they played their hand too late...


i always loved my k6-3 but here we are. the best company fucking won

i man shit all our power is now green so who even cares if its burning a kilow watt i think our outlets can handle 4 or 5 amp draw anyways and thats at like 120 volts so u do the math intel got legs for days like a 7 year old russian gymnist

File: otter.gif (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>160w TDP on stock clocks
>cute and perfectly normal massive temp spikes even with delid
Let's overclock one of these cunts to 4.3 giganiggas. What could possibly go wrong?

>>60362698
best company won by literally copying Hypertransport and sticking it with P3.

>>60362700
Jokes on you dumb shitskin, they run at 4.5ghz stock

>>60362681
v1.21 fucking nice

>>60362727
>can't differentiate VID from core volts
>indian inttelectuals

>>60362700
you sound new to power user computing

File: 1442290953264.jpg (125KB, 841x592px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 841x592px

>>60362650

>12 core @ 5000000000 Hz

>>60362715
let me give you a history lesson, kid. Once upon a time, Intel got so burned with the P4 vs Athlon X2 comparisons, they hurriedly churned up literal two Pentium 4 cores on top of one another aka the Pentium D. Ever wonder why the Pentium brand occupies that market segment now? Because of this shit.

Now, Intel seems to be repeating the same mistake.

File: hamlet.jpg (16KB, 460x241px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 460x241px

>>60362715
>single core turbo
Can't wait for the oceans to boil and the continents to melt. AMD thought they could innovate with a massively scalable and power efficient multi-core design that could be used in everything from datacenters to embedded systems, but Intel is literally about to bring the heat with a portable star generator.

>>60362752
Not happening this time bitch. 2 more cores from amd won't save them from the 2ghz difference in clock speed

File: QAQAQAQAQA FAGGOT.png (68KB, 224x207px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 224x207px

>new socket

>>60362752
Imagine if Intel wasn't batshit crazy with Netburst and fucking created Nahalem earlier.

The Pentium would have never been dead.

>>60362522
>i7 4c/4t

WHAT THE FUCK? HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHA

>>60362771
the mere existence of the i9's is indication that they're panicking.

File: IMG_2558.jpg (504KB, 2094x1242px) Image search: [Google]

504KB, 2094x1242px

>>60362813
I PUSH MY FINGERS INTO MY EYEEEEESSSSS

>>60362777
It's hedt, retard.

>>60362835
Nice, shame I don't play games with my Xeon so I don't give a fuck.

>>60362824
Good, the current i7 already destroyed any ryzen in any game, only thing amd had going for them was MOAR COARZ. Now intels adding MOAR COARZ too but with almost double the clock speed

>>60362835
so in one hand, you want them not to use AMD because lightly threaded apps will not use that power, but on the other hand, most users only ever have 60hz monitors and you push Intel because moar fps. Hypocrite much?

File: single socket holocaust.jpg (28KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 550x550px

Y-YEEEEEEES. OUR KING IS BACK PRAISE BE. GOD BLESS MOREGHZ AND LONGER BIBELINES.

File: 1366224457015.png (312KB, 424x389px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 424x389px

>Turbo Boost 3.0
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-max-technology.html

Wow, 4.5GHz single-core boost on their 160w nuclear reactor cores, what a steal!

>>60362869
144hz monitors have been a thing for years, now 240hz monitors started to appear. Enjoy living in the past amdrone

>>60362522
>7740k
>7760K

I don't understand, why they still allowed to sell the K version?

>>60362899
No iGPU for higher overclocks

>>60362895
>Enjoy living in the past
This come from corelet user.
Don't forget to buy a new socket for your new CPU.

>>60362895
yet majority of people will likely only play on 60hz.

Also, once you get bound by the GPU, the difference is a nonefactor when going to higher resolutions.

12 cores at 5ghz with 10% ipc in general usage?

12*5*1.10 = 66

16 cores at 4ghz = 64
more cores = lower MT scaling

>>60362869
csgo plays much much better at 200+ fps even on 60hz monitors

>>60362922
>12 cores at 5ghz
Oshit. HOT! HOT!

>>60362681
>5.2
>1.21v

DELET !!!!!

>>60362920
Someone who will buy a high end cpu will also buy a high end gpu and monitor poojet

>>60362681
1.21v fucking nice lottery win!

>>60362522

4.5ghz on a 10 core? Jesus

File: 1492127495787.png (871KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 801x1500px

>>60362522
And that $1500 abortion will get destroyed by 1800X

>>60362937
>>60362947
Samejeet

NEW HOUSEFIRES FOR EVERYONE! OUR LORD PRESCOTT IS BACK.

>>60362946
yes, and in those situations, you're bound to a GPU, the gaming performance is now negligible.

>>60362681
>.1% of Krabby lake silicon

File: nope.jpg (16KB, 374x114px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 374x114px

>>60362959

>>60362967

>0% of raisin

File: IMG_2802.jpg (169KB, 1248x720px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1248x720px

>>60362956
>1800x
Lul no

>>60362954
Turbo 3.0
Probably their new marketing for one core boost.

File: 9oVGc83.png (64KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 960x540px

/g/ has been running damage control for Intel for the last few days over this. Intel really cannot match zen's power effeciency (and you can tell it was one of the mmajor design goals for zen). Plus the MCM nature of zen means yields will be fantastic for their server dies. I genuinely doubt Intel can physically compete against the larger core count naples chips for price given the difference in manufacturing approach (lol monolithic dies at this sort of core count).

I bet you need a 2000w psu lol

File: fire-852.jpg (93KB, 620x349px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 620x349px

>>60362522
Intel wants to destroy the whole planet.

>>60362983

Whatever helps you sleep at night, shill

>>60362986
They can't and they are desperate enough to hire another wave of shills to shill these housefires.

>>60362522

>Blurry, angled picture of a monitor
>wccftech

Checks out

>>60362979
>>>/v/

File: 1494078532776.png (19KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x330px

>>60362979
POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60362988
>skylake-x assembly plant

>>60363002
what source is reputable to you? curious

>>60362967
my rando hits 4,8 at less than 1,2V with highs of 50s unless under heavy load

>>60362992
>Hey guys they will have 4.5Ghz on all 10 cores
>Probably too hot, most likely a one core boost
>SHIIIL SHILLL REEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Fucking /g/

File: IMG_3359.jpg (92KB, 687x683px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 687x683px

>>60363008
POO IN LOO

>>60363015

Actual sources without a 99% wrong streak like wccftech.

But it's funny, because when AMDs last ass pounding from Nvidia shows up on wccftech, you shills are all over about how currytech is just a load of bullshit rumor mill.

File: 1494133998797.png (139KB, 778x588px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 778x588px

>>60363022
DELID DIS

>>60363021
Angry shitskin, those Intels will boost like hell wether you want it or not. Your poozen is already obsolete

>>60363022
JEW IN ZOO

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0S4Sp18cLU#t=15s

5.3ghz with 3866 12-12-12-28 1T

>>60363010
THROUGH THE FIRE AND FLAAAAAAAAAAAAMES

File: IMG_3370.png (181KB, 293x397px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 293x397px

>>60363037
>cpu test
>with a poolaris bottleneck

>>60363015

>What? You don't accept unsourced pictures of excel from currytech?
>WHAT? WCCFTECH SAID AMD CAN'T COMPETE WITH A 1070? FUCKING CURRYTECH LIES RUMOR SHILL GOY FUCKING NVIDIA SCAM CON ARTISTS

>>60362522
for the price it will be, I can buy 12 P4, overclock them and spend less money on electric bills

>>60363047
i should have bought mine from silicone lottery

>>60363047
Sick. AIO or custom loop?

Oh wow our beloved IMG_xxxx spammer is back. Second coming of Lord Prescott brought him back. Hallelujah!

>>60362522
>250W

>>60363102
We're not talking about rx580 here

File: JUSTnich.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

MORE POWER! MORE CORES! MORE GHZ! BURN THEM DOWN!

>>60362650
Do the different clock speeds really mean that much across very diverse CPUs with different architectures?

File: 1491958654249.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>60363118
SUPER LONG BIPELINES

MEGA-TASKING

File: neato.jpg (69KB, 1440x810px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1440x810px

>>60363154
>MEGA-TASKING
YOU MEAN
GIGA-TASKING?

File: omg troled XD congrats man XDD.png (166KB, 467x349px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 467x349px

>>60362992
>With Intel® Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0, single-threaded performance is optimized by identifying your processor's fastest core and directing your most critical workloads to it.
Retard.

File: amd_nvidia_brand_war.jpg (532KB, 1528x848px) Image search: [Google]

532KB, 1528x848px

>>60363154
MEGATASKING THREADRIPPING MANYCORE MADNESS AT MULTI GIGAHURTZ THE POO ENDS HERE GAYME~!

>>60363113
You're right, Intel's 12C will reach 400W

MOAR COARZ
MOAR GIGAHURTZ

Why not IPC? Why not Neural Net Prediction?

>>60363220
WHO NEEDS BETTER BRANCH PREDICTIONS? WHO NEEDS IPC? JUST GET HIGHER CLOCKS. LONGER BIBELINE HERE WE GO.

>>60363220
They already have higher ipc than poozen

File: 1494580711671.png (258KB, 322x289px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 322x289px

>>60362522
finally a big bump in cpu power
i cant wait

>>60363231
Not in reality.

>>60363015
You know what's not particularly reputable? A currytech article sourced from a random Anandtech post based on a blurry picture of an Acer laptop's screen displaying a Powerpoint document.

>>60363231
You mean lower?
t. Agner Fog

>>60363244
Intel will deliver poojet

>>60362522
Maybe It can handle a blinking cursor on Electron

File: IMG_2740.jpg (443KB, 2133x1242px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 2133x1242px

>>60363251
I don't believe in some weeb shitskin, only in real benchmarks

File: Intel's source of manpower.jpg (95KB, 709x520px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 709x520px

>>60363253
They'll deliver a flaming war crime, that's for sure Pradeep. This is the atomic arsenal India's been waiting to unleash on Pakistan.

>>60363231
>Intel will deliver poo
ftfy
Or rather
>Intel will deliver poo on fire

File: rottr_1920_1080.png (21KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x330px

>>60363266
lol

>>60363266
>novideo card
>DX12
Bravo Pradeep.

>>60363302
>4 core lower clocked poozen destroys 6 core higher clocked poozen

lul

>>60363312
That's because 7700k is complete dogshit

Good.

You know AMD have been hugely successful when Intel actually start trying again. That's the best outcome we could hope for, especially if they keep the pressure on with Zen+.

oh, that sad man is here again
posting his little benchmarks all over again
I hope he gets paid for that.

>>60363324
>Intel actually start trying again
Prescott 2.0 is trying again? Lmao.

>>60362522
Ryzen exists so this shit is literally DoA.

Why did they delay, move it back early, delay and then moved back to august again? not to mention paper launch on computex.
Are they panicking?

>>60363345
Ryzen is literal poo

>>60363364
>Are they panicking?
You fucking bet. Add morbidly incomptent CEO into the mix.

>>60363366
Then Intel is worse than literal poo.

>>60362555
Probably $2000 this time.

File: 1494620862733.jpg (54KB, 493x493px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 493x493px

>>60363162
>>60363179
M E G A

>>60363377
>>60363383
There's releasing something more powerful than what amd plans to release in 6 months

>>60363483
What? Hands off adderall.

>>60362946
>Someone who will buy a high end cpu will also buy a high end gpu and monitor

[citation needed]

>>60362522
NEED MORE CORES FOR DEM PROGRAMS N SHIET

>>60363512
Source: his feminist trans-nigger jew ass

>>60362522
YAAAS, SLAY QUEEN!!

>>60362665
his anal cavity

>>60363525
NIQBA WHY U NOT MEGATASKING? QUINMA U NEED TO BE RIPPING THREADS N HITTING THAT PEAK WITHIN REACH ICP OF COMPETITORS CHIPS

>>60362650
lolno.

It's over. Intel won again

>>60363324
>yfw intel had been sitting on their hands the entire time.
>now all they can do is overcock and moar coars it.

>>60363617
Yes. Amdrones will shit their pants and this place because of buyers remorse a bit more lul

>>60363655
which is what is currently happening. They have to catch up in terms of tech here. A dieshrink isn't going to alleviate anything because AMD is also going to do a dieshrink of Zen.

>>60363655
Intlel is done for.

what are the chances that there'll be a 3-core six thread Athlon?

>>60363364

if intel was panicking then the 7700k and 7600k would have a price cut shortly after ryzen launched. all ryzen has done is give intel a reason to release this 'i9' they've been sitting on.

>>60363754
>intel
>ever
>fucking EVER
>lowering prices
Lmao Baheet.

>>60363675
because amd can just pull a shrink out of its ass

Pentium G4560X 3C/6T
$90

>>60363789
Ye, GloFo (and by GloFo i mean IBM's pocket monkeys) say hello.

For the price of a SPARC server.

>>60363754
The 7700k and 7600k will be replaced by 7740k and 7600k respectively, which might get the current chips a price cut

>>60363918
7640k

>>60362522
4.5Ghz max boost clock. Yeah, it's fucking nothing.

>>60364050
It's a lot on a 12 core considering you need nuclear volts to get a 4 core poozen to 4ghz

>>60364078
Hello Pajeet. Thank you for your assistance to Intel corporation. For your hard work and loyalty 0.1 rupees have been deposited into your account.

>>60364104
Nice rebutal

>i9
>4c/4t i7
>no i5
Remember you aren't a real gamer unless you buy an i9

>>60364314
You're not white if you buy poozen

We need to weed out gaymers from this tech board.

My cousin works at Intel and I have not heard this.

The again I haven't seen him in months.

>>60362522
>BANKRUPT
Probably what will happen to anyone that buys one of these desu.

>>60364356
You're not sapient if you buy pootel

>>60364117
Hello Pajeet. Thank you for your assistance to Intel corporation. For your hard work and loyalty 0.1 rupees have been deposited into your account.

>>60364513
>trying this hard to change subject when proven your beloved indian corpooration is poo

ampoo is done for

File: 1492906184132.jpg (12KB, 269x211px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 269x211px

>>60362650
>7700K draws 200W at 5GHz
>A 12 core at 5GHz will draw 500W
That's worse than Presshot 2.0

File: 1262163212155.jpg (11KB, 220x168px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 220x168px

>>60362522
>AMD products historically use a shitton of power compared to the competition
>hurr it doesn't matter
>Intel product has a higher TDP
>Ayyymd tards suddenly meming housefire and tdp memes like it matters

It's funny that you will almost never hear AMDrones boost about the positive side of their products, it's always some meme about so called negative sides of the opposites teams product. It's called sour grapes.

>>60362522
is it designed for the NSA as well?

>>60364574
>12 core
>5GHz
>500W
You mean 800W

Why yes, I'm sure this $5000 chip will lead to some heavy competition in their shared target demographics.

>>60362835
>1080p
>very high
Good way to maximize the performance impact shit Nvidia drivers.

>>60364743
>impact *of shit

>>60364743
>amd product works like shit
>"Waaaaah, it's Nvidia's fault!"
Every time

Idk, I have my i7 980x since for ever and its still pretty good. That's like 6 years and counting. I don't see a reason for switching to AMD any tine soon.

>>60364394
Did you check the burn ward?

>>60364763
>nvidia product works like shit
>FUCK AMD, AMIRITE GUYZ?
Also, who plays CS at 1080p anyway high settings anyways? Shroud? lmao

>>60364779
>FUCK AMD, AMIRITE GUYZ?
Except I never said that, you claimed AMD's shit performance was Nvidia's fault, dumb shill

>>60364763
I blame AMD retards. Most of AMD kids stopped falling for the meme and bought nvidia and intel but unfortunately this didn't make them smarter

>>60364779
>>nvidia product works lile shit
Except it never does

>>60364798
>>60364795
this. shitty AMDfags literally can't use even perfect hardware

>>60364743
Nvidia drivers are complete garbage trash, news at 11.

>>60364843
If that was the case, the 7700k should also be affected, which it isn't.

This points to the AMD cpu being the problem, not the gpu drivers

File: 3a8lgbc0lxqy[1].png (50KB, 650x674px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 650x674px

>>60364793
>dumb shill
Mad that your testing methodology is shit?
>>60364798
Right. I guess that's why the 480 outperforms high end nvidia GPUs on DX9 games.

>>60364852
Doesn't change the fact that nvidia drivers are complete garbage trash >>60364857

>>60364866
>Doesn't change the fact that nvidia drivers are complete garbage trash
Except that's not a fact

File: 1493667275352.png (82KB, 1343x674px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1343x674px

>>60364857

Don't forget the one with the fury x vs 1080.

>>60364877
Not my fault you deny reality.

>>60364866
Watch them try to defend this.
>but muh brute force
Even if you've got a 1080 Ti no way in hell are you hitting 300fps on Inferno or Nuke.
>>60364877
It's literally a fact that no matter how good your CPU is you will be limited by Nvidia drivers on titles that aren't DX12/Vulkan.

>>60364887
Your meme isn't reality, but for fanboys it is ofcourse.

Keep holding onto that one cherrypicked benchmark though

>>60364884
>>60364857
>AMD products perform better on AMD hardware

Who would have thought

File: 1491301468158.jpg (687KB, 1914x1077px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1914x1077px

>>60364903

>>60364884
Jesus fucking Christ nvidia drivers are the worst most garbage pile of shit

>>60364917
>AMD products perform better on AMD hardware
So is that why the i5 got better performance with a weaker graphics card? Interesting.

>>60364903
lol being this retarded as to deny reality

you have to be the most retarded person in this thread

>>60364919
>amd cpu is shit

Woooow

File: 4.jpg (256KB, 1148x644px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1148x644px

>>60364919

>>60364917
Intel products also perform better with AMD hardware. Something isn't right with Nvidia drivers.

>>60364937
>nvidia drivers are shit
>fuck amd right?
How many times are you going to try this? Do you work at Nvidia HQ or do they pay you to work overseas?

>>60364934
>lol ur retarded
What are you 12?

>>60364958
Stop projecting.

>>60364966
Nice retort kid

>>60364969
ok IMAX

>>60364950
All it shows is that Intel has designed a product that works well with both AMD and Nvidia gpu's, while AMD has made a product that only works well with their own hardware.

Now take a guess at which is the superior product

>>60364978
Ok, kid

>>60364994
IMAX please stop

>>60365005
ok kiddo

File: 1484908025864.gif (371KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

371KB, 400x300px

>>60362835
>300fps with 1800x
uh, this guy gets 434fps with a 1500x
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yeCKpBPvcN8

>>60365017
that's right keep projecting

>>60365032
Ok, kid

>>60365036
t. IMAX

>>60365047
Sure kiddo

>>60362522
>i9 is the new i9
>i7 is the new i5 that also lacks hyperthreading
>will probably cost at least $700 for a 7800X

File: 1489610670338.gif (2MB, 360x202px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 360x202px

>>60362522
Oh my... I expect this to improve my shitposting capabilities by 38%.

>>60365061
Sure IMAX

>>60365065
Alright kid

>60365080
You're not deserving of (You)s anymore, IMAX.

>>60365086
Ok kid

>>60364884
holy shit novidia drivers are pure dogshit

>>60364591
>It's called modern politics
ftfy

>>60365113
No, you don't understand, this is AMDs fault.

File: 1448705572008.jpg (73KB, 500x333px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 500x333px

>>60365113
>"Waaaah, it's Nvidias fault!"

>>60364857
>novidia drivers
AHAHAAHHAAHAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAHAAHHAHAHAAAHAHAHAAHAHAH

>>60365154
>AMD gpu's working well on all available hardware
AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

>>60365160
>sniper ghost warrior 3
that name sounds made up

File: 1493532562287.png (623KB, 1098x779px) Image search: [Google]

623KB, 1098x779px

>>60365160
AMD, WHY DO THEY RUIN EVERYTHING? IF ONLY THEY GAVE ALL THEIR MONEY TO NVIDIA FOR DRIVER R&D!

File: Dawn of War III 1400p gpu.png (152KB, 548x629px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 548x629px

>>60365184

>>60364884
Worst gpu drivers in existence

File: 1441872538597.jpg (96KB, 524x519px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 524x519px

>>60362522
Fuck my body is ready.
But my wallet isn't.

Why you do this Intel?! :(
Gotta save up some money boys.
Finally some big fucking leap we have been waiting for.

> mfw

>>60364857
>>60364884
N O V I D I A

>>60362967
>>60362947
> the salt

>>60365026
it depends on the benchmark / scene used of course. AFAIK there is no benchmark option in CS:GO.

If they can release a 6 core CPU with a reasonable pricetag, they will win People back.
Like $350 ish

>>60365160
Now repeat the benchmark but stop nvidia's drivers disabling shadows and downgrading textures

>>60363231
>Poozen
Do we remember that PSA?

>>60364574
>>60364675
so what, really?

If you buy a Titan X, or some high-end GPU, or you do SLI/Crossfire, your PC becomes a room heater. But you get speed.

Same with the CPU.
Don't see much problem here.

> inb4 intel shill
I never bought a top-end GPU until a year ago or so. Then I bought a used 780 TI. It was fucking fast, but my room turned into a sauna.
But I learnt my lesson.

Performance = power = heat.
One can simply wait and buy a newer chip later on that has lower power requirements.

>tfw I ever had pentium 4 4.5 GHz

>>60363312
>destroys
>1.3 higher FPS
It destroys stuterlake as well

>>60365355
d-d-d-delet t-t-t-this

>>60365314
Dude, just put a fan in ur window or something.
My PC at full load will heat my room to 70F and stop.
70f isn't really hot.

>>60362522
>4.5ghz
are processors the biggest meme on the market right now? they are not getting more powerful, they just put more cores on them

they've barely made any progress in 8 years now

>>60365355
It does. $100 cheaper poozen is more powerful than the more expensive poozen. How do you explain this?

>>60365290

Do you have any evidence to backup this claim? I'm not saying your claim is inaccurate, I just would like to see something substantial to support it given the already impressive performance of GCN in this title.

File: IMG_2801.jpg (89KB, 500x485px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 500x485px

>>60365388
I know right? When amd released faildozer it lost hard to an intel sandy bridge. The story hasn't changed much 8 years later

>>60365191
>that fury X fps

I'm glad I bought one instead of a 980 ti

>>60365499
That shit draws 500 watts

>>60362522
>http://wccftech.com/intel-skylake-x-core-i9-7920x-7900x-7820x-7800x-x299-leaked/

Let me guess. New socket.... right?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

>>60362522
Yeah but does it run doom nativly?

>>60362522
>INTEL IS RELEASING 4.5ghz 12 core 24 thread i9 in June
Hope you have 2000$ ready for that room heater

>>60364591
It's the same for any fanbase unfortunately.

>Fermi released
Lol power doesn't matter
>Maxwell
OMG EFFICENCIES!!!!1

>Netburst
CLECKSPEEEEDS
>Core2
Who cares about clocks?

>Bulldozer
Power consumption doesn't matter
>Ryzen
Wow efficiency!

>>60365596
>>Maxwell
>OMG EFFICENCIES!!!!1
Really? Are you going to bash people for complementing Maxwell for it's efficiency?

>>60362606
That's the base clock dumb Pajeet

>>60365604
Considering it can't into fucking compute and lacks proper scheduling it's nothing special. Evergreen was also efficient.

>>60365314
Good luck at dissipating 800W in the size of that socket, and that's not even taking into account power delivery

>>60365604
Are you really too retarded for proper reading comprehension?

>>60364984
How do you even arrive at this conclusion? The performance impact it's massive on both systems
Pajeet should try to think for once

>>60365658
>"I-I didn't m-mean it l-like that"
lol

>>60365699
Actualy it doesn't, the only huge observable performance impact is on the 1060 pared with Ryzen cpu's, not the 1060 pared with Intel cpu's

>Intel Skylake X Core i9-7920X, Core i9-7900X, Core i9-7820X, Core i9-7800X Mega-Tasking CPUs Leaked – Kaby Lake X Core i7-7740K and Core i7-7640K To Be Entry Level LGA 2066 HEDT Chips
>Mega-Tasking

what the fuck is mega-tasking

>>60365924
You can play games, and watch a youtube 1080p 60fps video at the same time.
FUUUUUUUTURE is NOW

>>60365963
Woooow thank you happy merchant. But what about Ryzen?

>>60366007
You can watch 1080 videos on youtube but only at 30 fps and play games at the same time but only at 30 fps

>>60366007
Kilo-Tasking at best.

>60365100
Stay mad.

>Intel shills literally do it for free
What went wrong in your life? How did you let it come to this? You're advertising for a company that doesn't know you exist.

>>60365963
SUPER HYPER ULTRA MEGA TASKING GOYYY

>>60366036
:(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((

In bulldozer times amd shills were screaming that power efficiency doesn't matter. Now, with ryzen, power efficiency has become the most important feature of a desktop cpu. They sure are quick to adjust to new agenda.

Anyway, 8 core intel would destroy ryzen in productivity, and its 4.5Ghz turbo boost will destroy ryzen in gaming. All in all intel will be objectively a better cpu but the price will probably be 2x that of ryzen's.

>>60365470
>still posting the exact same day one benchmark of a patched game
>3 months later

You really, truly have no life, do you?

>>60362522
>4,5Ghz
>12core
No. At best, it would be 4.5Ghz for 1 core and sub 3ghz for other cores.

>>60366292
>and its 4.5Ghz turbo boost will destroy ryzen in gaming
That is not how turboboost works. You aren't going to stay at 4.5 GHz forever, and it's only on one core.

>>60365712
I meant it exactly as I said you dumb fuck.

>>60366447
>You aren't going to stay at 4.5 GHz forever

You would with a proper cooler. The throttling is temp based, isn't it?

>>60362835
>>60362979
>>60363022
>>60363266
>>60365470
Go away IMG_xxxx

>>60366509
Go away 14xxxx.jpg

>>60366579
You're so fucking retarded you don't even know what a UNIX timestamp is.

>>60366596
Go away 14xxxx.jpg

>>60366621
Dude it's not even funny anymore.

File: AMD-Threadripper-Whitehaven-wccftech-watermarked-image-1140x641.jpg (175KB, 1140x641px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1140x641px

>>60362522
>meanwhile, on AMD's side

http://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-16-core-threadripper-whitehaven-4094-socket/

>in b4 muh clocks

HEDT is all about multicore, and PCIe lanes, which AMD's HEDT has more of, and it will definitely be cheaper. The 7920X will prob. be at 3.2 GHz base at most anyway.

>>60366292
Ryzen's 8 cores destroys Intel's 10 cores lol

>>60366670

Price is going to be very interesting for those chips. It could open up some exciting options for low cost high performance servers. Then again the second any desktop mobo supports ECC anyone needing to run a teeny tiney server at home instantly goes out and buys a 1700.

>>60365355
POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60366684
Except it's Intel's 4 cores that destroy amd's 8 cores lul

>>60366704
Ryzen 4 cores destroys Intlel's 8 cores

>>60366726
Like, not funny. You got banned once. Maybe you should stop?

>>60366670
Another clocklet piece of shit with no pcie lanes?

>12 cores
>people still can't even utilise 2 cores fully
>paying for shit you can't use

10/10

>>60366670
Fuck you goy

File: IMG_2828.jpg (193KB, 650x889px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 650x889px

>>60366740
Lul no

>Still 14nm
They are going to cost a fortune. $2000 for the 12 core probably.

>>60366816
>not even in english
Discarded.

>>60366743
Go away 14xxxx.jpg

You're so easy to spot you assblasted amd shitskin

>>60366834
Man you really are a big whore thirsty for (You)s.

>>60362522
Meh.
the 10c part is still only 3.3base.
So a 12c part is gonna be like 2.8-3ghz.

Not interested, call me up when they get 8cores at 4.5ghz base.

>>60366830
Literally DoA. Intel is fucked forever

>>60366853
Nobody is going to buy these pootel overpriced abortions.

>>60366853
It will be more like 4ghz base clock since it boosts to 4.5 stock without OC you dumb indian. Amd lost their last MOAR COARZ advantage

>>60366292
>Source: My ass

>>60362681
Get back to me when it can run Prime95 for 30 min stable

This thread looks like a zoo with bunch of monkeys flinging shit at each other.

>>60366847
Please give me more (You)s sir

File: Panorama.jpg (600KB, 2550x1446px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 2550x1446px

>>60366704
Nope.

File: IMG_3366.jpg (995KB, 2159x1216px) Image search: [Google]

995KB, 2159x1216px

>>60366893
Or actual benchmarks

>>60362860
Why didn't intel actually innovate enough for my ancient i7 2600 to be obsolete after nearly a decade? All the while re-releasing yearly with the slightest single digit performance boosts and constantly bullshitting consumers with their terrible mobo practices?

Now that amd is semi competent I have no reason to suck intels cock.

File: 1492587863785.jpg (395KB, 2400x2000px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2400x2000px

>>60366704
>>60366816

>>60366909
>testing cpus
>by bottlenecking them with a poolaris

Only an indian could be this stupid

File: Comb10042017094551.jpg (552KB, 1032x2865px) Image search: [Google]

552KB, 1032x2865px

>>60366853
>NIGGAHURTZ IS ALL THAT MATTERS
>MOAR JIGGAHURTZ!

>>60366921
lol intel is complete dogshit even in gaymen

File: JUST krzanich.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>60362873
YAMEROOOO

File: zO1cwF0.jpg (24KB, 540x405px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 540x405px

4c 4t desktop i7's

:thinking:

>>60366891
It says right there in OP that the 10c/20t part is 3.3ghz base.
The 12c/24t part isn't going to have a higher base clockspeed...

Again, it's still just meh tier shit.

I'm not even in this whole amd/intel shitfling fight, I'm quite happy with my 4830K until Intel or AMD (Ryzen, not that old shitdozer) get 8cores @ 4.5ghz base.
Then I'll have a worthwhile upgrade to my current PC.

File: u28ZhDPMdhIggnhMYMlvQRnbYxyAM76jk5_8KrNzqqI.jpg (148KB, 768x504px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 768x504px

>>60366911
You mean the ones that now conclusively prove that Nvidia's drivers are bottlenecking Ryzen CPUs?

>>60366921
>>60366929

File: mark.jpg (1MB, 1505x4363px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1505x4363px

>>60366292
>>60366911

>>60366948
Testing Ryzen CPUs, by bottlenecking them with Nvidia drivers.
>>60366946

>>60366942
4 cores? What do you need two cores for?

>>60366932
>amd makes 8 core low clocked cpu
>YES! INTLE ON SUICIDE WATCH
>intel makes 8 core cpu with higher clocks and insane turbo boost, that can't be achieved on ryzen
>MUH GIGAHERTZ INTEL SO BAD LUL
Admit it, you guys just shill for amd. Intel's 8 core is higher clocked and has higher oc potential. It makes it objectively better than ryzen. It makes it a great cpu for both single and multicore, while ryzen lacks in single core. The only problem is price

>>60366816
>5775C beats 6700k and 4790k
Really makes your almonds jog

File: IMG_3353.png (42KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 653x726px

>>60366946
>IT'S NVIDIAS FAULT
>IT'S WINDOWS FAULT
>IT'S GAME ENGINE FAULT
>IT'S RAM MEMORY FAULT
>IT'S MOTHERBOARDS FAULT
>it's not just my piece of poo cpoo

Go back to the shitting street pajeet

>>60366991
And yet in reality is inferior in EVERY way.

>>60362536
Yee

>>60366991
That's not how it works, idiot. This is exactly the same as when the Pentium D was released. They're generally clocked higher than Athlon X2's but offered shit multitasking perfs.

File: IMG_3368.jpg (896KB, 2069x1242px) Image search: [Google]

896KB, 2069x1242px

>>60366957
Try a real benchmark, your anime weeb jerkoff isn't a benchmark

>>60367032
Is this before or after the ryzen patch?

>>60367022
That's not how it works either, idiot shitskin. At the time amd had more cores, not this time.

File: 1494604128459.png (842KB, 880x499px) Image search: [Google]

842KB, 880x499px

>>60367008
So basically Intel is shit.

>>60367022
Only 6900k offers better multitasking already. Updated higher clocked version will provide even better multitasking.

File: IMG_3365.jpg (571KB, 2142x1182px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 2142x1182px

>>60367043
No amount of patches from poojet will make your cpu 50% faster so that it catches up to intels in games

>>60367008
>Factual proof that nvidia drivers are cucking ryzen
>N-no it's s-still amds f-fault
LMAO whatever helps you sleep at night you dumb mongoloid

>>60367054
And yet that piece of shit gets exterminated by the 1800X

>>60367080
Except it doesn't

>>60367071
You forgot to install the CPU drivers LOL

>>60363801
>on x299 besin falls :------DDDD

please make it happen

>>60367080
Except it loses in multithreaded performance to 6900x. I hope amd pays you enough to shill this hard.

Could you all stop giving him replies?

>>60366991
>Higher clocks
Higher single core turbo you mean. The base clocks on the Intel are not higher than the Ryzen series.

>>60367032
Try a real benchmark, your Novidia drivers are bottlenecking the Ryzen CPUs
>>60366946

>>60367133
See>>60367008

>>60366496
And power based. I've gotten my SB-E Xeon to do some minor throttling purely because it was hitting the package power limit.

>>60367086
>>60367103
>no benchmarks
Stay mad with your aborted CPUs

File: g stands for games.png (47KB, 791x769px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 791x769px

>90 ips
>331 posts
quality /g/ at it again

>>60367126
All modern intels are easy to oc, and oc quite good.
6900k can be OCed to 4.4-4.5 quite easy with normal cooling.

>INTEL IS RELEASING 4.5ghz 12 core 24 thread

Thanks AMD for forcing Intel to offer something with more than four cores.

Too bad it will be priced like a car and nobody will be able to buy it.

>>60367163
Nobody will buy it since Ryzen will always be better.

File: IMG_2649.jpg (124KB, 784x580px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 784x580px

>>60367174
All benchmarks prove you wrong shitjeet. Your buyers remose's showing hard when even an i3 shits on poozen's 8 core

>>60367210
>Topic at hand is about high end prosumer CPUs
>Keeps posting gaymen benchmarks
Can you not act like a 12 year old?

>>60367210
I'm not seeing any R5 so it's an old shitty benchmark.

>>60367243
R5 is even worse than r7

>>60367137
I have evidence, you have shitposts. You lose.

File: Screenshot_20170418_142236.png (55KB, 804x1036px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 804x1036px

>>60367103
Orly?

>>60367250
This doesn't disprove the second half of my post.

File: AMDRyzen1800XIntel6950X1_0.png (29KB, 617x837px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x837px

>>60367103
>>60367267

It's just one retardedly buttmad Intel shill spamming the same shit despite being proven wrong time and time again because he enjoys getting shat on

>>60364919
>>60364937
>amd cpu is shit
That's not how I interpret that data; both the 1800X and 7700K have an average framerate below 30 fps. They are both shit. I don't care if one has a frame more or less than the other, none of the configurations in that chart do an average of the bare minimum of 60 fps. The 1800X is shit, the 7700K is shit, the GTX 1080ti is shit, the Titan XP is shit and the Fury X is also sit. In bullet summary: It's all shit. All of it.

>>60367267
>rx 480
There's your problem