No hope for wintelfags.

>>60347014
What does windows have to do with this?

File: 188 KB.jpg (187KB, 1920x1864px) Image search: [Google]

187KB, 1920x1864px

>>60347014
where are the Xeon benchmarks?

>>60347014
English please?

>>60347014
>no 7700k
Houston we have a problem

>>60347086
>7700k
>Houston : "we want to build a moonlander, not a missile launcher"

>>>/v/

File: semen.jpg (621KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 2048x1536px

>>60347014
>Some new shit game
>no 7700k

File: gta 5 ultra 1800 king.jpg (687KB, 1914x1077px) Image search: [Google]

687KB, 1914x1077px

Once again throttlefags get cucked

>>60347254
>$500 shekels cpu loses to $300 cpu

Top kek

>>60347086
>implying 7700K is any different to 6700K

>>60347295
>14 fps is fine

File: c5f.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

>>60347254
>10 fps less average fps
>literally twice minimum fps

>>60347014
>wintelfags
Is this a linux exclusive title?

>>60347254
Min FPS > Average FPS

>>60347254
Source

>>60347649
amd dot com

File: 5.jpg (313KB, 1270x678px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 1270x678px

>>60347254
>cherrypicking benchmarks
wew

>>60347295
>cinematic mins vs. kinetoscopic mins
>losing
that's where you're wrong, kiddo.

>>60347667
>Nvidia DX12 drivers
nice meme

>>60347724
The only meme here is Ryzens drivers apparently

No-one is buying an 8 core CPU for muh vidya anyway. R5 6-cores are where it's at for price/performance over Intel.

File: 1361299880580.jpg (119KB, 390x390px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 390x390px

>>60347739
>Ryzens drivers
>>60345561

>>60347767
>amd performs like shit
>it's Nvidia's fault
kek

>>60347797
Kill yourself.

>>60347813
Umad fanboy?

File: Comb18042017090310.jpg (463KB, 1122x2012px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1122x2012px

It's another episode of /v/ shows day 1 benchmarks with Nvidia ©®™ GPUs and pretends AMD's 8-core processors are only used to play games in your mother's basement all day long.

>>60347086
its just a overclocked 6700k

>>60347178
>prey 2
>shit
Intelfags in denial about the 2017 goty

>>60348026
It's not Prey2 and not even Prey. It's another shitty SS2 clone. Which is STILL worse than SS2 itself.

>>60347086
More like Houston where's the housefire amirite?

>>60347739
>Ryzens drivers
You're the most retarded lifeform in the universe.

>>60348234
x64 & x86 drivers from AMD are important

>>60347667
>talks about cherry picking
>drops a deus
>wat

>>60347649
>>60347663
It's from linus you shills. All of his videos have intel ads
>cucked again, never fails to make me rofl

>>60347254
dem min fps

File: 1491062981332.png (130KB, 1597x634px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 1597x634px

>>60347739
>amd drivers
>yes they are better, even with intel CPUs?

>>60348772
>cf vs 1070
lol

>>60348772
This is an important comparison to make, seeing as throttle faggots choke on rehashed pre windows update tomb raider fps which everyone knows is poorly optimised and causes underutilised GPU on AMD systems.
Cucks need to learn how to read

File: Untitled.png (280KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 1920x1200px

>>60347254

Oh look it's another faggot linking to GTA V benchmarks. Little do you know, the game is busted as fuck and when your framerate goes too high it spikes back down hard and locks up temporarily. Why is the minimum so much higher on Ryzen? Because its shitty IPC is so much worse that it can't hit the fps cap where performance plummets and never gets the engine hard lock.

Want proof? Take any piece of shit rig from the last 3 years and load up GTA V. As long as you aren't using a integrated GPU, you should be able to replicate these results.

Set the game to the very lowest settings, 800x600. Load up the benchmark and watch what happens when your fps hits 187.5. Bing. Freeze time. Doesn't matter if you have Ryzen or Intel, it's all the same shit. Only reason Intel shows it in actual high graphics settings benchmarks is because it's just too fucking fast.

If I put an FPS cap at 186 in Rivatuner, I never get minimum fps below 90. And I have a 7700k at 4.8Ghz, a 1080 Ti STRIX OC and 32GB DDR4 3200Mhz.

File: 1700X 7700K 1080p crysis 3.jpg (423KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1920x1080px

>>60348801
>lower clocked 1800X performing 6.21% slower than 7700K, when given the same unnerfed drivers, than 7700K in a game shills think proves throttlecore is better
>Yes crossfire RX480s give a better ceiling to go beyond the GPU bottleneck
your point?

>>60348843
See
>>60348917
Keep shilling that cherrypick mindframe, cuck
The rest of your spew doesn't make sense from any learned perspective
>good job faggot, you wasted money on a 2012-standard throttlecore

>>60348944
you're getting 90 min fps at 4K on ultra settings, on GTA5?

File: Capture.png (14KB, 507x477px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 507x477px

>>60348944

HURDURDUR 99% percentile of 10ms means 59 fps amirite faggot.

Stay poor and shitty.

File: the final proof.jpg (395KB, 2400x2000px) Image search: [Google]

395KB, 2400x2000px

>>60349003
the fuck are you talking about, braindead faggot?
I'm guessing every time you see intel get wiped by twice the number of cores, threads and cache, you close your eyes and holler like a little bitch and pretend you didn't see it
>inb4 'but muh overpriced throttlecore'

>>60349072
I've already proven at least 2 of those benchmarks to be wrong (GTA V and Crysis 3). You want me to keep disproving the others?

>>60349072
POOTEL STUTTERING HOUSEFIRES

>>60348068
>shitty SS2 clone
thats doom 3, not prey