/g/ explain this logic that ppl want fucking live tv again, i understand the whole marketing meme of taking something away only to offer it again later and seem great (See any annual video game series) but this is just retarted.
the entire point of cordcutting was for the on-demand aspect, not watching live, there is no such thing as "live" programming that is already produced and people already have spoken in droves that waiting to watch it on-demand without commercials was more appealing than watching it "live" (aka first on tv)
ps dont tell me this is for /tv/, we all know tv doesnt actually discuss logical things except thinly veiled fap threads about actresses
You can't really openly endorse piracy of TV shows because not everything's on netflix, you know?
I thought youtube TV was literally just airing traditional cable and local TV stations through the internet?
>>60334951
there's nothing being pirated, netflix/hulu ect.. legally offer all the shows just on-demand
now they're all trying to offer "live tv" again which is fucking retarded and the exact opposite reason people cut their cords but there are zero articles actually discussing this fact
also most places offer these barebones 20-30 channels for the same price anyways and higher quality since a 1Mb/s (average 1080p internet stream) cant compare to 8-9Mb/s which cable uses for its signals
i get shit in the mail all the time to re-add cable to my charter service and would come with like 200 channels for 30-40 bucks and a DVR
this shit aint even on par with that
>>60334817
Sports. Political debates. Any number of other live events. Surprised you even had to ask this dumb of a fucking question
>>60336754
Make a 24 hour schedule with just those, based on a topic.
>>60336803
Espn and cnn already does that fag
>>60336803
Why? I dont spend 24 hours a day watching tv
News and sports op, people want live news and sports. They're the final link in cord cutting.