are there any good 144hz 1440p freesync displays that are not asus?

>>60330334
Not a lot of selection. I think Acer has one and there's a Korean company called Pixio that makes one.

1440p is basically a meme stopgap resolution that nobody wants to fully buy in to.

>>60330334
No.

>>60330334
Dude just buy Nvidia

>>60330450
that's like saying just accept the aids

http://www.eizoglobal.com/products/foris/fs2735/#tab02

I have the acer one, XG270HU I think. It's pretty good once I calibrated it. No VESA mount though.

File: Capture.png (294KB, 1398x608px) Image search: [Google]

294KB, 1398x608px

>>60330804
wut

File: Capture1.png (63KB, 1110x568px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 1110x568px

>>60331704
funny seeing nvidia users buying a freesync monitor. nvidia really needs to stop being jews.

really sad not to see to many 1440p 144hz freesync options. i like the eizo but man ~$1,300??? that's more than any gsync monitor i've seen for 1440p. i thought freesync was post to be cheaper.

not a fan of acer and don't particularly like how the acer one looks.

asus from what i can tell still has QC issues. 50/50 chance getting a good one or not. my past experience with asus monitors was 4 to 0. all had dead / stuck pixels.

kinda wish dell had a 1440p 144hz freesync like they have a gsync. the s2417dg looks nice for the price. $400 for a 1440p, 144hz, gsync. and with it being 24in, a nice high dpi. yeah its tn but from the reviews it looks solid for a tn panel at least

>>60330368
i really don't know why 1440p isn't more popular. its a nice step up from 1080p but not as demanding as 4k nor as costly. its a good compromise resolution imo.

Bought a 70hz 1440p freesync iiyama for 270 euros
No way I'm paying triple that for 144hz.
70hz is already more than a 10% increase over 60hz

>>60331953
IPS panel btw. Fuck TN

>>60330334
snsv makes some I believe

>>60330334
>144Hz
bud y

>>60331704
>wut
what's the problem? it's 144hz 1440p freesync, just like the op wanted and it's arguably the best gaming monitor available today.

>>60330334
Just go 24" 4k 144hz. Why bother with 1440?

>>60333099
>24" 4k
>scale down to 1080p
lel
and
>4k 144hz
>being able to run that
wew lad