CPUs What Happened?

>>60325049
>Why all of a sudden is 4 cores not enough
because multiple cores are more and more power efficient and the only way to keep increasing our computing power exponentially
>Why is ryzen considered bad at gaming if it does 60fps in everything
because people are fanboys and are unable to assess things rationally
>Why is it assumed everyone has a 144fps display and a 1080ti?
because /g/ is actually closet /v/

>Why all of a sudden is 4 cores not enough
Because Ryzen is here and many more threads for reasonable price.
>Why is ryzen considered bad at gaming if it does 60fps in everything
Relatively bad, if you are gametard who needs PC ONLY for gaming you need Intel
>Why is it assumed everyone has a 144fps display and a 1080ti?
Cause 'tech-enthusiasts' are most loud in these discussions. If you check /r/amd you'd think Fury was a success and everyone is rocking 1440p at least.

File: More Cores Than AMD.png (57KB, 646x675px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 646x675px

>>60325049
>Why all of a sudden is 4 cores not enough
I went for the 20core meme a long time ago anon

>>60325049
> Why all of a sudden is 4 cores not enough
There is nothing sudden about this.

People can't evaluate even approximately how much processing power they need, so they're getting "the best" or something near it.

It had both bad and good effects for everyone else (the few that know how much they needed and just wanted to buy about that).

> Why is ryzen considered bad at gaming if it does 60fps in everything
> Why is it assumed everyone has a 144fps display and a 1080ti?
Everyone also needs moar LED in their computer case and peripherals if you ask some kind of gayming people.

>>60325049
Why are you listening to memers. Even in Steam 2 cores is the most popular configuration.

>>60325049
No idea, rocking a Phenom II X4 for years and have no intention to upgrade so soon

Ryzen is "bad" at games because it "only" performs on par with a 5Ghz inferno lake i7 in most modern games while having much better frametimes and slightly worse in older titles (like 300fps instead of 315)

>>60325239
>Even in Steam 2 cores is the most popular configuration
Yes, you should build your PC around the most destitute poorfags playing free2play garbage on their ancient craptops with integrated GPUs.

>>60326619
This.

>>60326953
Also, 2 cores actually isn't the most popular. It's 44%. 4 cores is 50%.

>>60325561
>better frametimes
Literally a meme. Ryzen stutters like crazy.

>>60327501
nope.

>>60327501
It's good to know all shilltel has left is literally "NO U!"

>>60325049
>Doom soundtrack

Doom 2016 was a legitimately great game.

File: ryzen_stutter.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>60327524
>ryzen 7 dips from 100 to 55fps in witcher
>LOL INTELSHILL STUTTERLAKE LMAO
Really makes you think.

>>60327645
How about something more than a clip of a video with no context whatsoever? How about you test if doing the same thing on Intel does the same to the framerate? Oh, wait, you don't have any of that. Fuck off.

>>60327705
Lol you amd cucks are so desperate. The video has [email protected] + GTX1080 in Witcher 3 and as you can clearly see rotating your camera in CPU heavy zone makes your fps dips to 50 from 100.
>b-but it must be the s-same on intel!
Yeah, suuure. First Ryzen doesn't stutter, now it does but Intel is worse. What's the next phase of your denial?

>>60327645
only 55fps that nothing, meanwhile Intel drop as low as 1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ

>>60327753
So you have nothing? Ok then, guess you can just fuck off then.

>>60327645
dips to 55 fps is hardly "stutters like crazy". 55 fps is a frame time of less than 20 ms.
Level1Techs showed sporadic frame times of around 200 ms on 7700K in GTAIV.

>>60325049
>"more than 60fps on a 60hz panel is redundant"-meme

why is /g/ so tech-illiterate?

>>60327800
Intel froze the whole screen, nice gaming experience

File: doitfgt.jpg (85KB, 835x703px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 835x703px

>>60327645
>>60327753
>Some guy spun around in a circle really fast and the FPS went down to 55, AMD BTFO!!!!!!!11oneeleven

This is the intelligence of your average Shilltel.

>>60327899
>ryzen doesn't stutter, guys! j-just don't rotate the camera!

>>60327962
>intel doesn't stutter guys! j-just don't play the game at all! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qswrFCb5sMQ

>>60327962
Kill yourself.

>>60325049
ryzen is not considered bad at gaming
ryzen has applications where intel brings superiour gaming performance
and that too not in every game
the important thing is
and please bear with me

if you want to benchmark the performance of a cpu
you don´t let it be bottlenecked by your gpu

if you let it be bottlenecked you can not make any statements that are worth the time of the reader

lastly no
i don´t have a computer
i am morsing the posts sending the message towards my middleman who then uses a secure proxy going over a proxy in every country in the world to access a vm inside of an abandoned datacenter to use firefox to post the message i sent him this way i can not be monitored by the nsa

>>60327800
D-D-DELETE T-T-T-T-THIS

>>60327645
Хyя блять, ты co cвoeй aнaльнoй бoлью дaжe cюдa пpиeхaл?

>>60327753
kek intel shills and their stuttery housefires are getting so desperate it's absolutely hilarious

>>60328309
DELID THIS

>>60328500
idi nahuij suka putin davai

File: 1403282930873.jpg (20KB, 600x454px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 600x454px

>>60328519

>>60328588
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_SnJAqbcXY

>>60328657
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xS5R0VD8rg

>>60328513

if their shitposts per minute drop below their KPI jewtel will remotely combust their cpu and burn their house down

>>60327645
>>ryzen 7 dips from 100 to 55fps in witcher
>>LOL INTELSHILL STUTTERLAKE LMAO
>Really makes you think.

>i7 dips from 100 to 5fps in witcher
>LOL AMDSHILL STUTTERZEN LMAO
Really makes you think.

>>60327645
>>60327753
>smoothly spins camera around for 12 seconds
>LEEEL STUTTERSHIT RYZEN

>>60325049

>Why all of a sudden is 4 cores not enough
Because applications are starting to adapt to the direction things are headed: more cores.

>Why is ryzen considered bad at gaming if it does 60fps in everything
Because if the only thing you give a shit about is frame rates, it's sub optimal price/performance.

>Why is it assumed everyone has a 144fps display and a 1080ti?
It isn't. The high frame rates are because that's the only place where you'll see a meaningful difference between CPUs. The truth is that it doesn't matter a shit outside of a couple edge cases (like 144Hz monitors) what CPU you get.

>Why is it assumed everyone has a 144fps display and a 1080ti?
It isn't. It's just considered good practice to use the most powerful graphics card available to get a better picture of the CPU's performance, without GPU bottlenecks interfering.

>Do you even have a computer?
Yes.

>>60325049
>gaming

geez remember back in the old day of e6600/e8400 being complete shit after optimization made so q6600 trump them like nothing? Today is much worse those next gen console port games gonna wreck any quadcore cpu soon enough.

>>60328992
>i7 dips from 100 to 5fps in witcher
According to amd cucks?

>>60327962
>Intel doesn't overheat g-guys! Just don't overclock!

>>60329208
You're right, it's not 5fps, it's 1fps actually >>60328309

>>60329072
>applications are starting to adapt
Multicore applications have been around for a decade you fucking dipshit AMD shill.

AMD can't compete with Intel on the high end so they are just dumping more cores on the market and shilling as hard as they can.

>>60329714
>AMD can't compete with Intel on the high end so they are just dumping more cores on the market and shilling as hard as they can.
No that's BESIN FALLS

>>60330016
They do the same shit on the GPU end.

They can't compete with Nvidia so they showcase dual GPU cards or crossfire instead of a standalone product.

>>60329714
>>60330111
Kill yourself tripshitter.