why aren't you using a 16:10 monitor, /g/?

I don't have special snowflake syndrome.

>>60320627
Because I'm a member of the 21:9 master race.

>>60320637
>Sour grapes
Calling less common but superior (anything) "special snowflake" is a way to justify not having one. It's okay, some people are born poor.

>>60320648

Enjoy your letterboxing

Because I use the superior 4:3

I am

>>60320627
But I am. Upgrading to 21:9 soon.

>>60320627
8:5

>>60320627
But I am, anon.
Sadly, they don't really seem to make monitors in this resolution anymore, so when it's time to upgrade past 1920x1200 I guess I'll have to have to become a 16:9 pleb.

because iam not a retard

File: 1494467771554.jpg (543KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 1920x1080px

>>60320627
Here ya go OP, I fixed it.

File: speccy.png (32KB, 606x438px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 606x438px

>>60320627
I am, fgt.

because aspect ratio is the last thing I care about when buying a screen

>>60320627
Because I use the superior 4:3 ratio which allows the eye to see everything important on screen at once and enables a taller workspace

>>60320683
Nope, Superior for gaming and movies and when using them for work, it's 2 5:4 panels with zero bezel in the middle.

>>60320949

> he bought into the meme

Just get a 40" 4k panel pleb

>>60320974
>16:9
>calling others plebs

>>60320733
>21:9
the worst of memes

File: 1470472735299.jpg (466KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

466KB, 1600x1200px

>>60320824
>not 2560×1600

File: Yamakasi DS270.jpg (124KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1000x667px

But I am tho...

But what's a good upgrade from this monitor?

I want something that's more suited for media creation, so reference colours and high bit display. One of those Ezios?

>>60321004
Well it's either get a 21:9 monitor and use it as dual 5:4 monitors or drop $10k+ on two 5:4 monitors.

File: gutsnspeccy.jpg (509KB, 1624x1812px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 1624x1812px

Should I go back to triple screens, or should I go VR? This is my old system from way back when...

>durr why don't you use what i use durrrrrr

File: Golden.jpg (3MB, 3000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x2000px

>>60320974
>Just get a 40" 4k panel pleb
This right here, OP.

And If you really need a fancy ratio in order to work; 3000x2000 is about 32.5in. on mine.

>>60320627
because real men use 4:3.

>>60320627
because we are tighter than bark on a tree

>>60320627
Coz no 4K ones I can afford

I am. I have two 16:10 monitors

>not using a 4:3 monitor bought at goodwill for $12
pleb

>>60321402
>Not salvaging a 16:10 monitor or buying them in bulk from school hardware dumps

>>60321511
>16:10
kek, enjoy that empty space on the sides while watching older chinese cartoons, pleb.

File: JUST_0.png (1MB, 960x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 960x720px

>>60321524
But then you have black bars on the top when you watch newer chinese cartoons. There's no way to win.

What modern 16:10 monitors aren't shit?

>>60320627
I have two 4:3s.

>>60320627
I am

>>60320627

Oh but I am.

1680x1050 laptop. 2560x1600 desktop.

Owner of a Dell U2410, old but have a lot of Inputs.

Because I don't have one, OP.

>>60320649
>but superior
no proof

File: Michael_Maestlin.jpg (257KB, 1000x1663px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1000x1663px

mφw I'm stuck with a 1680x1050 samsung monitor

>>60320749
yes, they do

eg NEC EA245WMi, Eizo EV2456

both are quite new

The thumbnail hurts my eyes. What sorcery is this ?

>>60323442
rectangular subpixels. absolutely disgusting.

>>60320627
We use 16:10 monitors in our school.

>>60321050
instead of wasting money on 3 monitors, you can just buy VR.

>>60320627
30" 2560x1600 it's old but comfy

>>60321009
Everyone's a critic.

>>60322067
png nigger. dont you know australians cant load those huge files?

File: screens.png (38KB, 573x656px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 573x656px

What's this then

>>60320627
I would like to, but these cunts are pushing 16:9, which are shit when rotated 90' due to being too long and make you lose important screen height you could have used for your fucking IDEs.
That proportion is only good for phones.

File: doggo.jpg (149KB, 625x838px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 625x838px

>>60320627
16:10 is inferior to 16:9.

File: 20170511165329.png (40KB, 1279x890px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 1279x890px

>>60320627
But I am.

>>60327469
>more visible area to work with
>somehow this is bad

I'm using 16:9
3240*1920

>>60320627
Because widescreen ratios are designated shitting ratios.

because i'm using a 4:3 VGA CRT monitor that's honestly better than any other monitor i have. others i have are really shitty lcds

>>60320627
Why would it be 16:10 instead of 8:5?

File: speccy.png (59KB, 806x678px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 806x678px

>>60320627
I am using one though. It's great in portrait.

>>60327495
>more visible area to work with
This depends on the resolution, not the aspect ratio.

File: display.png (5KB, 254x57px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 254x57px

>>60320627
But I am