Would a 32" 2k monitor be good investment?
Still using a 24" 1080p and want to upgrade.
I need more resolution for work, don't do much gayming, don't really care. I'm an eyelet so I think 27" monitors would be too small.
Or should I go for a 4k monitor? any cheap one that's at least 32"?
1:1
>>60320275
Whatever you get make sure it's IPS. I like my 24 inch 4k monitor. It was like 300. Some scaling issues but worth it for video and picture purposes
>all these arbitrary ratios
>all missing the perfect one
>2:1 (16:8)
>>60320372
yeah forgot to mention, ips. can't stand tn anymore.
>>60320311
>>60320418
truly ascended tier
bumnp
https://www.amazon.com/DLT-W40DUHT-Inch-3840x2160-Monitor/dp/B01HTDI818/
thoughts?
>>60320275
How about 360°?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3RgnNRxLOM
>>60320275
3:2 should be the next one on the list
>>60323337
3:2 is below 4:3, at least for laptops.
>>60320275
Fuck man do they even make new 16:10 monitors anymore? I think they stopped at 1980x1200 some few years back
>>60323375
I'm tempted to get and old 16:10 2k 30" monitor, but they are fucking big.
>>60320275
2k IS 1080p
>>60320275
>no 3:2
>no 21:9
>>60320372
>(((picture and video purposes)))
>porn
gross man
>>60323365
haha. no.
>>60320275
fify
bring em back
>>60323743
patrician
>>60323743
just get an ipad
>>60324036
>LCD
Disgusting
>>60324780
>interlaced display
retard
Who else here /9:16convertible/
>>60320275
3:2 master race
>>60320275
Why not call 16:10 by its real name, 8:5?
korean monitor y/n?
>>60325753
Because if you don't start it with 16 you will confuse the normal public.
>>60320311
/thread
>>60325884
bump