i3- 2 cores/4 threads -> 2 cores/6 threads i5- 4 cores/4 threads

>>60304510
lol still worse than ryzen... fail intel

>>60304510
ok dude. They are totally gonna design a brand new version of SMT and then have the granularity in the design to choose between enabling 2.5 threads per core 1.5 threads per core and 3 threads per core. Nice one.

>>60304510
>i7- 4 cores/4 threads
What

File: WIN_20160815_01_28_23_Pro.jpg (171KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 640x480px

>>60304510
>4 cores/10 threads

>>60304510
i3>4 c/4t
i5>6c/6t
i7>8c/16t
probably i3 and i5 "plus" versions with ht and vtx enabled too

>>60304510
celeron 2c4t-$50
pentium 2c4t unlocked-$100
i3k, 4 core 4 thread-$200
i5k, 4 core 8 thread-$250
i5x 6 core 6 thread-$350
i7k 6 core 12 thread-$400
i7x 8 core 16 thread-$800

i3: 4 core / 4 thread
i5: 4 core / 8 thread
i7: 6 core / 12 thread
*-E: lots of cores / lots of threads

Anyone expecting more than 4 physical cores from any i5 is delusional.

>>60305014

Ignoring the bait level in OP, why would you assume 1.5, 2.5 and 3? What even would half a thread be?

2/6 -> 2 cores with 3 threads each
4/6 -> 2 cores with 2 threads each and two single core ones (both existing things)
4/10 -> 2 cores with 3 threads each, 2 cores with 2 threads each.

Only one new development. Not that this isn't still just bullshit.