End of C?

File: 1494332105752.jpg (733KB, 3702x2198px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 3702x2198px

>>60297895
>End of C?
finally

>>60297895
i wish assembly gains more popularity

>>60297895
its about time.who uses a language that doesnt support strings in 2017 anyway?

>>60297895
>>60298089
Assembly is highly unportable, unlike C which is very portable.

>>60298587
>doesn't support strings
you dumb fucking nigger what do you think a string is? It's always just a \0 terminated character array, C just doesn't fucking hide it from you because you're not a nigger

>>60298637
>Just use Java for everything

>>60298637
Donald Trump is the current president of the United States. He is the successor to the previous president, Barrack Obama.

>>60298647
>This program only works one one computer because it's incompatible with any other processor.

>>60298658
false equivalency

File: 1491486104736.jpg (41KB, 446x373px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 446x373px

>>60298640
i knew it that some faggot are going to bring up char arrays.CHAR ARRAYS ARE NOT STRINGS FAGGOT.WHEN I USE A STRING I EXPECT IT TO WORK OUT OF THE BOX.I DONT WANT TO FUCK AROUND WITH ARRAYS JUST FOR DEALING WITH TEXT AND COUNTING WHICH INDEX THE FUCKING 'K' LETTER IS ON.

>>60298640
>>60298658
wow\0 so\0 edgy\0

>>60298688
C doesn't even have booleans

pajeets everywhere on suicide watch

>>60298718
Pajeets used java.

>>60298733
and C

The future is JavaScript. Everything will be made in JavaScript in the near future.

>>60297895
> TIOBE
It's pretty random quite frequently.

> Assembly is rising while C is in steep decline? o.O
Unlikely to be accurate. The actual changes are probably less extreme overall.

>>60298738
No they don't.

>>60298705
Can't you just

#define true 1
#define false 0

typedef char Bool;

For a makeshift boolean?

Why would you have any use for assembly? If two processor handle x86 differently it will result in programs that work different or not even compatible.

>>60297895
VISUAL BASIC DOES IT AGAIN
/wdg/ BTFO!!!!!!!
IS THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN STOP VB????

>>60297895
That's because there's literally no reason to use C instead of C++ pretty much anywhere.

Assembly, on the other hand, still has a niche in algorithms that are optimized for specific architectures. C and C++ can't replace that.

>>60298705

#include <stdbool.h>
bool hasBooleans = true;

>>60298748
for the love of god no lol
javascript is so fucking disgusting

File: 1494249236696.png (441KB, 3555x2198px) Image search: [Google]

441KB, 3555x2198px

>>60298640

>>60298766
yes, but an int will be faster

>>60299265
No it wont

>>60299225
kek

>>60299299
Actually it will. There's a type called "uint_fast8_t" in <stdint.h> which is guaranteed to be typedef'd to the fastest datatype on the system you're compiling for that has at least 8 bits of precision. On x86 this is defined to be "int", and on x86_64 it is defined to be "long long". If you don't believe me, open stdint.h on your own system and check.

>>60298784
if processor can run x86 instruction set binary, it will run it, EOF

>>60298750
i think they are using term 'assembly language' for every instruction set there is, so i would not be surprised if this data is correct

File: 1463964896647.png (94KB, 578x499px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 578x499px

>>60298766
This is exactly what #include <stdbool.h> does.

>>60298738
pajeets can't into c

>>60297895
A faster Python would kill everything, not just C

>>60298658
Fuck Drumpf and fuck white people

>>60299697
sounds nice, came buckets to the thought of python superseding PHP

>>60299697
>A faster Python
Nim

>>60299953
literally who

This thread again...
When will webdev and pajeet learn ?
It's not because you don't understand that it's bad.

>>60299953
looks like a nice little language, Anon

>>60299413
Oh cool, although I haven't quite worked out how _Bool translates into an actual data type: without stdbool.h, mentions of _Bool won't compile and I see no mention of _Bool getting defined in stdbool.h.