Ryzen 5 was a massive success

File: 1405865353819.gif (442KB, 420x594px) Image search: [Google]

442KB, 420x594px

>>60297301
>http://wccftech.com/amds-ryzen-5-well-received-cpu-launch-nearly-decade-survey-reveals/
>sandy bridge on top
Fuck yeah

>>60297333
>Sandy Bridge: 75.9%
>Ryzen 5: 83.9%
intel pajeet failed math

>>60297420
>http://wccftech.com/amds-ryzen-5-well-received-cpu-launch-nearly-decade-survey-reveals/
It's still on top of the list

>>60297454
because its the earliest cpu on the list dumbass its by time

>>60297511
No it's on top of the list because it was the cpu release ever

File: 1493967449274.jpg (510KB, 1315x794px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 1315x794px

>>60297301

>>60297526
>No it's on top of the list because it was the cpu release ever
poojeet learn english

>>60297527
>4.1 ghz

File: 1487465412040.png (234KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 800x612px

>>60297301
DELET THIS

File: 1470777836586.gif (2MB, 375x209px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 375x209px

>>60297526

>>60297301
Holy shit! It's a wccftech article that isn't a shitty clickbait rumor that tries to make AMD look bad! I can't fucking believe it!

File: delidding intensifies.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>60297544
lol cucked https://communities.intel.com/message/472112#472112

>>60297870
>he hasn't read it

>>60297902
I did, but then I just noticed this was just posted. They really have no shame in posting complete bullshit, do they? http://wccftech.com/watch-nvidias-gtc-2017-keynote-volta-supercomputing-9-pt-may-10th/

(Volta is not even remotely on the list of covered material, it's all meme AI and self driving car shit)

>wojacks and false flagging
Oh another console war thread on /v/.
Wait a second.

>>60297966
Volta comes out in September! GTC is perfect for it like it was perfect for Pascal

>>60298050
>I literally believe everything I read on the internet, the post

>>60298077
Vega won't even last 3 months, get BTFO poojet

>>60297301
>pootech.com

>>60298099
You can crawl back to wccftech now, retard.

>>60298117
Not him, but you totally got wrecked there lad

File: 1494086911518.webm (719KB, 440x262px) Image search: [Google]

719KB, 440x262px

>>60298050

>>60298050
GDDR6 won't even be ready until 2018 according to Samsung and SKHynix. At best we'll get an introduction to Volta's architecture soon and then a paper launch or product announcement later this year and actual products to market in Q1 to Q2 2018

File: amdloo.png (316KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 882x758px

ITT

>>60298102
poopowerup shill detected

File: housefire.jpg (273KB, 1032x774px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 1032x774px

>>60298430
>projection

File: 1080.png (31KB, 500x650px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x650px

>>60298441
techpowerup are shills now? You mean the guys that intentionally benchmarked a recent game using AMD's older 4xx series of GPUs instead of the more recent 5xx that increase performance by 10-12%? They're shills? Consider killing yourself.

>>60297539
>>60297658
he was making a joke about the url fucking smoothbrains

>>60299416
>You mean the guys that intentionally benchmarked a recent game using AMD's older 4xx series of GPUs instead of the more recent 5xx that increase performance by 10-12%?

Are you really trying to criticize TPU for not benching a rebranded, OCed 480 against stock NVIDIA cards? Get in the oven, Pajeet.

File: Geforce 960 shilling - TechPowerUp.png (3MB, 1903x6755px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1903x6755px

>>60299416
AMD refused to send Techpowerup any Fury X samples because they knew how much they are shilling against them. this is a fact that made it to their home page as "news" and was the top discussed AMD related topic for half a year.

The second most popular AMD related news they had was "AMD had no videocard driver updates for half a year", which conveniently ignored that a) they had no new cards at the time to release drivers for, and b) they released dozen or so beta driver updates in the mean time.

>>60300059
>rebranded, OCed 480
Wrong, fuckstick. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6st6QZTDxE
>Get in the oven, Pajeet.
You got your memes mixed up.
>>60300148
Figures, fanboyism and under-the-table money always end up creating shitshows like this.

>>60300355
>Wrong, fuckstick.

?

It's objective fact that the 580 is simply an OCed 480. There's no difference in performance clock for clock. The obvious AMD shill you linked also corroborates this, so I'm not sure what your argument even is. Why are you upset about reviewers fairly representing products, snowflake?

File: 1492487474070.jpg (16KB, 303x309px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 303x309px

>>60297658
>having little kids saved on your computer

are you a pedophile?

File: Screenshot_3.png (13KB, 630x131px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 630x131px

>>60297301
>http://wccftech.com/amds-ryzen-5-well-received-cpu-launch-nearly-decade-survey-reveals/

>>60300453
there's literally nothing wrong with having pictures of little kids saved in a computer
#LGBTP #tolerance #againsthate

>>60300446
580 has better stock clocks and OCs better than a 480. This has been confirmed multiple times. You're a dumbass shill. 1060 lost, get over it, fgt.

File: 1452799837787.png (650KB, 512x800px) Image search: [Google]

650KB, 512x800px

>>60301236

>>60301265
>580 has better stock clocks

it doesn't.

> and OCs better than a 480.

it doesn't. max OC, if you're lucky, still sits around 1450mhz. most 480/580 can't even hit that without suicide voltage.

>You're a dumbass shill. 1060 lost, get over it, fgt.

1060 is objectively the better card, only reason to ever buy the 480/580 is if it was considerably cheaper (like $100 cheaper) to offset the lower overall perf and perf/w.

File: 1454039405929.png (49KB, 808x805px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 808x805px

>>60302836
>>580 has better stock clocks
>it doesn't.
fact denial

>>60302836
>to offset the lower overall perf and perf/w.
pajeet, you know nit everyone has to burn petrol for power right?

>>60298441
niuce meme