There is a clear possibility of a serious error at the CPU level and yet just because it's very rare to be met it isn't being solved
why do people rely on linux? and I just randomly picked a source file, in this case cpu.c
>>60278019
Fix it yourself then, dumbcunt.
>>60278126
/thread
>>60278126
good luck doing that on the original linux tree
first of all, comments are ignored by compilers so its not actually effecting the quality of compiled code
second, computer programming is more about communicating with other programmers than with computers, or else everyone would write in ASM w/o any commentaries right?
>>60278290
lmao dude nice reading comprehension
if you like comments so much you should actually read them once in a while
>>60278290
Why didn't you read OPs commentary?
>>60278019
>There is a clear possibility of a serious error at the CPU level and yet just because it's very rare to be met it isn't being solved
Please refrain from complaining about this until you understand what this flaw actually means, OP.
>>60278358
>>60278300
i live my life by images
i could as well ask why op is bitching instead of FIXING THE PROBLEM
It's important to comment your code OP
Learn a trick or two stick around bud
>>60278358
he read neither my OP nor the image, just saw a comment and decided to write bait it would seem
>>60278126
>>60278406
>>60278429
LIDF strikes again
>>60278456
It's important to read the OP before posting
don't bother sticking around
>>60278019
The comment means that it just werks most of the time, and it's up to the users of the get_online_cpus() to make sure that a livelock doesn't occur