Distributed, Uncensorable Wikipedia

B u m p
u
m
p

so it's just raw html?
how do you update the articles?

>>60277974
They'll just start messing with the content in the articles.

There is no escaping the big brother.

>>60277974
we don't care about cuckopedia
there are lots of well-referenced options that doesn't suck dick

>>60277974
>implying the average Turkroach is tech literate enough to use that

>not having Wikipedia backup downloaded in case this happens

>>60278217
using a static site generator?

>>60278284
What's the "uncucked" encyclopedia of your choice?

>>60279737
stormfront.org
Alt right can't stand when reality disagrees with them on most cases.
They are well aware they can edit articles assuming they have good source.

>>60277974
Probably fapping. Still happy to see that IPFS is actually being used. Hopefully this will push wider adoption.
I saw the demo and it was pretty good, but the actual experience is nowhere as good as the demo. Lots of dead nodes and barely any content. Setup should also be easier for normies to catch on

ipfs is bad because doesn't allow dynamic webpages at all
decentralized hosting of static content with centralized server and clientside scripting would be a lot better

>>60280534
they are working in this.
give it a few months or years.

>>60280534
>decentralized hosting of static content with centralized server and clientside scripting would be a lot better
Sounds like ZeroNet to me

>>60280534
Will maidsafe be any good if its released?

>There will be Arabic, Kurdish and English versions coming shortly.
why not chinese?

>>60282392
>why not chinese?
Because Tiananmen didn't happen. Chinks are such a herd.

>>60277974

If it's uncensorable then nobody can admin the content. If nobody can admin the content then shitposters will run rampant.

And if they market it as "uncensorable wikipedia" then it will just attract pointless politically charged articles instead of STEM