how many hertz is real life?

File: 1494192237741.jpg (21KB, 324x447px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 324x447px

this really hertz

The human eye can only see at 30 fps which is probably caused by the world running at that too. Evolution adjusted our eyes to the frequency of the universe over time

>>60273076
Just overclock your eyes

>>60272976
the amount of times light can change in a second

>2011+6
>not overclocking every body organ

File: Gondola_52befe_6140995.jpg (175KB, 627x749px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 627x749px

>>60273049

>>60273076
the real difficulty is syncing

People seizure between 3-30 hertz. So your visual tick rate probably varies and in that area.

>>60272976
Depends what the temperature is.

>>60272976
You want gear that is close to 850 × 10^21 hz gear, because that's what "pro" real life players use competitively right now.

https://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-measure-the-smallest-fragment-of-time-ever-witness-an-electron-escaping-an-atom

File: 1493570103951.jpg (100KB, 1024x964px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1024x964px

>>60273049

I was reading before few years an article about air force testing limits of human eyes and in their study human eye can see up to 280 frames per sec dont't now is that true ir not can't find the article

>>60274091
288hz displays when

29.97 hz at 800x600

>>60273528
>Overclocking reduces life expectancy

an average human life lasts 39.6 nanohertz

>>60272976
1.855 x 10*43

File: 1494224346697.gif (978KB, 154x154px) Image search: [Google]

978KB, 154x154px

>that feel when you can tell the difference between 144hz and 240hz and plebs call bullshit.

>>60272976
about 350

10E43 fps

>>60275189
hertz is a measure of frequency, not just time
and 39.6 nanohertz completes a cycle every 292 days, are you saying people are alive for 292 days, then are dead for 292 days (repeating)?

>>60272976
430-700 trillion hertz depending on the type of light

File: 1442262947685.jpg (52KB, 581x593px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 581x593px

>>60273076

>>60276032
This.
https://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1+%2F+(planck+time)

Some real lifes claim to run at higher frequencies, but even scientists can't tell the difference.

>>60272976

23.976

One unit of planck time is roughly 10^-43 seconds, so calculate it yourself

>>60272976
The human eye can only see 32-bit.

>>60276124
>>60276429
Wouldn't every quantum unit of space basically be running asynchronously though? So even if there's a smallest unit of time, that doesn't necessarily mean it's ticking in sync across all space. I mean, time dilation and stuff is a thing, right?

How long is a second?

>>60276032
>>60276124
Planck = 5.391×10^-44 seconds
Hz = Repeating event per unit time
Fuck off with your inconsistent units

Vibration of an atom is typically: 10^13Hz

>>60275095
But it's fucking fun.

>>60276539
1/ 5.391×10^-44

They're perfectly consistent units you inverse-blind mongroid

>>60276466
Time is not synchronised at all. Planck time is merely the smallest possible unit of time.
But really, plank time having a definite value and the relative nature of spacetime is actually one point of contention between general relativity and quantum mechanics.

There's no synced time. Forget about that completely, it's nonsense.
But more important is to realise that every single different rate that time passes is as valid as any other. It's pretty wrong to call them 'different' as they are correct, perfectly so. The paradox that two different and conflicting viewpoints can both be correct is another interesting thing about relativity.

In short, clocks are dumb.

>>60276687
Is planck time even a quantum unit, or just the smallest measurable amount of time? If something was going 90% the speed of light, does it take ~1.1 planck time units to cross 1 planck length, or does it travel 8 planck lengths at 1 planck time unit each then spend 2 planck time units crossing the 9th planck space?

Also seems like if time is a quantum unit, if something were to magically be going faster then light, it'd actually be teleporting and skipping quantums of space every so often instead of passing through all space between two points?

>>60273654
what if my eyes are offset to everyone else's eyes, and I'm seeing something totally different from everyone else?

my brain is probably running at 5 cycles per second

>>60272976
The time it takes the speed of light to cover planck length in one second, if not that probably infinity, you might be able to make an addon to your nervous system that allows sensing more visual information more quickly in one second than the human eye, but how many hertz is the human ear? How many times can you detect someone touching your skin in one second? Put your hand on a vibrating washing machine, or hood of a car or sub woofer and you can tell many differences.

>>60276080
Yes, please have a look in Buddhism.

>>60276474
1/60 minutes
1000 milliseconds

If light travels 300000000m in a second and the smallest distance measurable for light is a planck length, real life is 4.491018e+41hz

real life is at least 240fps

>>60279352
eagle detected

>>60279352
trained jetfighter pilots are indeed able to identify type, weapons and weapons left on an plane after seeing it for 1/250s.
Humans are however even able to detect change up to 1/1500s although that is the limit and the test subjects were not able to tell what exactly changed, only that a change occured

Clif says the materium pops in and out at about 77 trillion hz

>>60278983
How long is a millisecond?

>>60275095
so its basically steroids and gear

>>60276654
seconds != units per second

or I'll do it in the way you are used to
My shoe is greater than your IQ

File: sun.png (478KB, 1024x742px) Image search: [Google]

478KB, 1024x742px

all these retardation reminded me of this.

>>60272976
About 1.855e+19 yottahertz.

>>60284861
No you idiot, if you define "frame rate" as 1 planck time per frame, you can trivially compute the "frame rate" of the universe, and that's your hertz.

>>60284920
They obviously mean 8 light-minutes per hour. Which is still 13.333% of the speed of light, so not really plausible. And I don't think that would give us the sun's energy FOREVER, since the Earth absorbs energy and that energy has to come from somewhere. All it would accomplish is keeping that energy a constant distance away from us.

>>60272976
All of them.

Roughly 299 MHz.