Can't get into recursion? I help you, follow this post:

>>60255986
What sorcery is this
Nice get btw

>that guy who writes a recursive function when there's an obvious and farm more efficient explicit function

>>60256047
>i don't know how to understand a 9th grade concept so i'm going to rationalize my stupidity and unwillingness to learn

>>60256047
"Recursion" is more elegant and usually uses less memory, as long as it's implemented correctly.

>>60256047
>that guy who doesn't know what tail call optimization is so he assumes that all recursive functions are inefficient

>>60255986
da fug

>>60256027
/g/ is a slow board. It's easy to predict post numbers using a scraper.

:break:

>>60256085
>caught exception: SyntaxError. Ignoring, and continuing.