AMD BTFO..... AGAIN

amd btfo
how will amd ever recover
amd fags on suicide watch

On to the next thread.

>>60239115
>Tom's Hardware

They beyond parody now

>Paul Alcorn

Into the shit filter you go

My only beef is that they don't seem to be taking threading into account.

>>60239115
>G4560
>i3
Is funny how the first one basically makes any current i3 irrelevant, but they still promote it at mor ethan twice the price.

Also, two i5s

No ryzen

Today I have seen the Goy in reality

>>60239115
Doesn't matter. A 1600 costs about the same as a low end i5 and matches or beats most i5s in pretty much everything, and if you include the cost of motherboards the 1600 is cheaper than even the low end i5s.

File: jews lau .png (14KB, 333x293px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 333x293px

>recommending i3 to anyone
>ever

>>60239209
But yeah, AMD hasn't released the low end yet to compete with the Pentiums and i3s.

>>60239224
>No Ryzen+Vega APUs yet

FUCKING REEEE

>>60239115
>If you dont have the time to research benchmarks
>if you dont feel confiden enough in your ability to pick the right processor
>Fear not!
>Intel has the right processor for your goying... I mean gaming needs

>>60239232
Vega hasn't even released yet, it's starting to get ridiculous.

>>60239209
i5 7500 give more consistent gaming performance
but i would still prefer to get r5 1600 instead

>>60239254
>more consistent gaming performance
nah
Ryzen provides more consistent framerates. I might have believed you if you had said the 7600k, but not the 7500.

How gimped are the G series cpus exactly? Are they really terrible?

File: ppc2.jpg (211KB, 476x1494px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 476x1494px

>>60239274
At times ryzens preforms simmilarly to an intel i3's

this is what i meant

and there is no denying it

yes its usually in older games but it does happen

so I usually browse a different board
and there's a fair amount of shilling, particularly surrounding release dates for pricey (like embarrassingly pricey) shit
all of which immediately disappears after the release date

is there amd / intel shilling on this board?

File: 1494014963230.png (1MB, 1186x678px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1186x678px

THIS KILLS THE INTEL

>>60239304
G series used to be 2 cores 2 threads with make them useless only with kaby lake intel made them 2/4 and by doing so intel it self mayd i3's terrible value proposition no one should ever buy. There are few instructions missing in pentiums compare to i3s but it has 0 impact on gaming preformance and if you buy 2 core cpu for rendering than you should consider suicide.

File: DX8lqY0[1].png (214KB, 1085x4042px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1085x4042px

>>60239115
LOL

>>60239313
Tom's Hardware disagrees

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-5-1600x-cpu-review,5014-5.html

>>60239325
DELID THIS

>>60239361
He's a paid intel shill though so we can't take any info he gives out seriously anymore.

I own an i3-6100 btw.

>>60239395
Yep, the machine I'm typing on is running an i3 2350M and my desktop has a 4690k. I plan to buy a 1600 or 1700 soon though.

>>60239395
>He's a paid intel shill
good joke i even told i would prefer to take r5 1600 over 4 threaded i5 yet i am the shill? I hate shilling both intel and amd. Intel being jew of a corporation doesnt make blind amd shilling justified.

and i have i7 6700 but only because amd was to slow with ryzen and i couldnt wait any longer while i wanted cpu with more than 4 threads. If i was buying my pc now i would get r5 1600 instead.

>>60239115
>Recommending the 7100, ever

At least they made clear their article was parody from the get go.

File: Intel_Inside_2011-Present.png (190KB, 1050x788px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1050x788px

>>60239405
You think you're planning to do that, but when the time comes you will wonder... can you really... trust AMD? What if the rumours everywhere about stability issues are more than just rumours. From all of our years together you know you can trust the blue sticker. And you will buy Intel.

>>60239417
>good joke i even told i would prefer to take r5 1600 over 4 threaded i5 yet i am the shill?
No, just saying anything out of tom's hardware shouldn't be trusted because they have a huge bias (intel bribes). I mean I like my i3 but I wouldn't go out and tell people it's the second cumming of christ even if intel offered me money. Reviews should be objectively fair with as little bias as possible. I want to see how product X performs like and whether it's objectively better than competitor X's stuff not your paid opinion on product X.

>>60239453
>your paid opinion on product X
i wish intel would be paying me

and amd should have paid me for all the years of sticking with their graphic cards and defending them online

>>60239440
Nah. I'm still running an FX-6300 in my NAS and every GPU I've ever bought has been AMD.

File: 1494029489258.gif (443KB, 480x238px) Image search: [Google]

443KB, 480x238px

>>60239440

>ITT- a bunch of gross AMD poorfag shills

Stop complaining that professional don't think shit poo processors are good, especially when thru get out performed by INTELS LOW END PROCESSORS

Why would anybody support a company that can't even make good high end chips, then attack good reviews just because they disagree with them? Sorry to break it to you sweetheart, but not ever review that calls you out for making a shitty product are fake, infact.. most are real, no shilly, just protecting consumers from horrible AMD products

Kindly fuck off

>>60239115
he gets paid to pump this shit out
must be nice

File: thegrabbler.png (290KB, 539x722px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 539x722px

>>60239504
hmmmm good post my friend!

>>60239504
go away, Paul

>2500k overclocked to 6.5ghz, it's now faster than anything new from jewtel or ayyyymd
>Live with parents so don't pay for power
Living the dream

>>60239325

>run a 7700k at 5 ghz
>get a new one for $35 3 years later

BASED INTEL

>>60239504
see >>60239325

File: 1421089873636s.jpg (12KB, 229x250px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 229x250px

>>60239504
yes, yes this honorable man talks the truth!!

buy intel my friends

>>60239634
>thinks spamming le happy merchant maymay makes products perform better

File: AMDRyzen1800XIntel6950X1_0.png (29KB, 617x837px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x837px

>>60239657
Whatever you say mr.goldstein

>>60239504
>Why would anybody support a company that can't even make good high end chips
But that's exactly why I don't support Intel.

>>60239686
>decent single core
>loses on multicore
>no source
>synthetic benchmarks everywhere

File: mark.jpg (1MB, 1505x4363px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1505x4363px

1/0 Day without jew trick

>>60239608
Hello, where is the proofs?

>>60239705
You do know the i7-6950X is a 10-core $1,700 processor and the R7 1800X is a 8-core $500 processor, right?

>>60239761
/g/, explain yourself. I thought toms hardware was supposed to be bought and paid for by the jooooooooosssssssss at intel?

>>60239115
(((Tom's Hardware)))
The original intel shill strikes again

>>60239115
Seriosly fuck amd and their stinky poojet shills.

>>60239799

They are.... hence why those results had negligible impact on their overall "score" of ryzen.

File: Xilinx-Spartan-6-SP605-development-board.jpg (54KB, 441x246px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 441x246px

Why the fuck do you people get so heated over incremental increases in CPUs technology? You actually think your video games are gonna run that much better?

File: sth ryzen benches.png (2MB, 973x6115px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 973x6115px

>>60239705
kys shill

>>60239522
>>60239222
>>60239634


>posting these horrible racist photographs

You need to stop this and delete these at once

shills are resulting on toms shillware to get their daily dose of shilling going..

toms hardware a place that even intel fans dont even go anymore

>>60239115
>BTFO
>LMAO
K Y S
Y
S

>>60239240
The only ridiculous thing here is your existence.

Official link for CPU rankings
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-cpus,3986.html

>>60240133
>Official link
>jewshardware.cuck
K man

Intel did it with the Pentium 4 vs Athlon 64, it's not different today.

the funny stuff is he has a tag of amd on the thread

LOL

>>60240114
lol where do you think you are?

>>60239115
That's Toms Hardware. That blog isn't going to recommend anything but Intel and NVidia ever. It used to be a good site 10 years ago. Today it's not. My opinion on that isn't based on this, btw, it's been going downhill for them for years and years. Actually, this 10 year old video is probably the peak of their existence:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSr6Nr9oSTM

>>60239129
>how will amd ever recover
No. The stock is down 20% from the local top and it's falling nicely. There's plenty of downside left.

>>60239232
No APU for you until Q1 2018.

>>60239304
>Are they really terrible?
Any G-series CPU before Kaby Lake is terrible. They are currently the best bang for the buck budget CPUs.

File: 1493287280548.png (871KB, 801x1500px) Image search: [Google]

871KB, 801x1500px

I wonder (((who))) could be behind this

>Tom's Hardware

>>60239115
that's really shitty of them. and this is coming from someone running an intel 6850k. ryzen should have at least easily took the spots of both i5's and the i3. i5's and i3's hands down have been made irreverent.

>Tom's hardware
>The site that recommended the P4 over the Athlon64

>>60239115
>i3
>i5
Jesus fucking Christ.

>i3
You can't make this shit up.

>>60239627
My i5 3770k was $300 then and it sells for $320 on eBay right now.

>5 year old CPU has the same value it did on release.

You know things are stagnant when...

>>60239224
That's true. But no one said the G4560 was bad. No one said the list should e entirely AMD CPUs either.
G4560 is still great value and I doubt even the APUs will challenge it much due to their greater die size meaning they probably won't be under $90.

The list should be
>G4560
>1500X
>1600
>1600X
>1700

>>60239705
Literally none of those programs are "synthetic benchmarks".
Since you have no idea what that word means yet you use it anyway, you ought to kill yourself.

>>60240541
Unless....they release [spoiler] 4 core/8thread Athlons with less L3.

>>60240541
Literally wut

>>60240305
>it used to be a good site 10 years ago
Haha? Go look at their Phenom, Thunderbird, and P4 reviews from 15-16 years ago.
That site has always been a blatant Intel shill site.

>>60240567
Er not Phenom. What was before Thunderbird again? Athlon? In 2000 or 2001. You know what I mean.

>>60240567
>>60240577
Good and valid points, but you have to admit this video was really cool at the time:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OFNUhE5FSs4

I know, today it's not much but nobody else was making videos like that back then.

>>60240553
Idk. Maybe if they had less PCIe lanes, less cache, and so on. Then yeah, they might sell a 3c/6t with a few iGPU CUs for under $90.
If it's a full Zeppelin die, those are so much larger than 4 excavator cores on an A12-9800.
I'm really expecting these to be more expensive than their previous APUs. In the $90-$225 range.
Granted they could do a 2c/4t as well. They said "there won't be Ryzen 2 cores". They didn't say the same about Athlons and APUs.

>>60240606
Well they've done cool stuff with either, yeah. Their benchmarks for Ryzen were mostly fine, too. But ultimately in their main recommendation articles and such they ALWAYS recommend Intel even if it's far inferior and/or inferior value.

>>60239224
There is no reason for the i3 to exist
Either get the pentium 4560, a FX8300 or spend more on ryzen

>Tom's

Massive chuckle

>>60240656
This is the dumbest advice ever on /g/. I mean, yeah, there is being a fanboi, and there's being a retard. Fine line, anon, but you have jumped clean over that motherfucker.

Nice shitstorm in the comments, this will make the rounds on the Internet very quickly.

Just wait for anandtech's Q2 recommendation, for Q1 they recommended a 1700 over a 7700k.

File: 1af.jpg (145KB, 890x890px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 890x890px

>>60240114
nani?

File: Screenshot_20170502_145050.png (581KB, 1919x905px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 1919x905px

>>60240114

>>60239115
Intel's budget is definitely big enough to pay "reviewers" to make these recommendations.

>>60240950
It's the same guys who conned everyone to stick with a P4 and not buy a A64x2 AND WAIT FOR FUCKING PRESCOTT.

Looks like an ok Intel recommendation chart, though no 6 or 8 cores for the high end? Very strange.

Where's the AMD chart?

File: People-Are-Laughing-at-You.jpg (52KB, 600x400px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x400px

Your naivite is laughable. You really think there's such a thing as "getting more for less". Well it's time to wake up, smell the coffee, and apologize to Intel. All this time they sold you the best processor for the price, while you were lost in silly dreams of paying less for more power.

File: IMG_3450.png (31KB, 780x371px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 780x371px

>>60240950
Intel RAVAGES poozen even in price/performance

>>60241076
>cost per FPS
>PC gamer

Oh lol

>>60241067
Trolliing used to be an art.
This post only make you act like an AMDshill trying to falseflagging.

>>60241086
Or like a brainwashed capitalistscuck

Intel is like Steph Curry, 3 pt/gaming specialist

AMD is like Kahwi Leonard: a more well rounded player/product.

>>60241076
>that benchmark doesn't count reeeeeeeeeeee!

>>60241076
So, what you're saying is that the 7700K is total shit?

>>60241076
>pls buy our i3's 2007 performance for cheap

File: 4HgSpk3.jpg (230KB, 598x792px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 598x792px

>>60241086
The hypetrain came and left and as usual
AMD fanboys are left defeated and dissappointed. Just accept that your Poozen is shit.

>>60240541
>G4560
>FX8300
>1500x
>1600
>1700
No reason to buy the 1600x, as you can just overclock the 1600 and the FX8300 is a nice CPU between the G4560 and the 1500x

>>60241076
> flat $ per average fps
> doesn't take into account minimums
> doesn't realize that the "best value" CPU's are the cheap, low performance chips nobody actually buys for gaming, because the performance isn't there.

>>60239115
>paid shill """"tech""" website
>relevant
>i3 in 2017
Tom's Hardshills at it again.

Even their own readers don't buy this shit, hilarious.

inb4 Tom's moves to gaming only benchmarks and removes the computing, workstation, office, system and synthetic ones.

File: firefox_2017-05-06_04-37-05.png (26KB, 875x257px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 875x257px

>>60241165
Not everyone wants to overclock, senpai. And not everyone wants the stock cooler, even if it's nice.

>>60241197
This was my favorite one. picture related.

File: 1493838371744.png (37KB, 661x447px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 661x447px

>>60241211
Even the 7700k is a shitshow in BF1, much less a dinky i5 threadlet

>>60241211
Overclocking it is as simple as raising the frequenzy and maybe giving it a small voltage bump
The stock cooler should be enough for 3.7 or 3.8Ghz
And even if you have a bigger cooler, its still neat to have a stock one laying around if you ever need one, while also paying less
Currently using the stock cooler of my 1700 at
3.6Ghz while undervolted
62C under full load, about 48C during gaming

>>60241243
I don't care. The 1600X is 3.8-4.1GHz stock. Mine was only $220. I wanted a different cooler anyway.

>>60241243
What a piece of shit. 7700k stays under 60C on 5ghz with an AIO

>>60241355
Maybe while iddling on the desktop lol

>>60241243
Overclocking is for children.
perf/watt gets demolished, and you're both running the CPU out of spec with no guarantee for stability even after a full day of IBT

>>60241415
This, for someone who doesn't turn off their machine for months, overclocking in beyond retarded.

>>60241076
I have a hunch you're doing this because you enjoy being BTFO'd time and time again

>>60241428
As long as you don't increase the voltage, power consumption doesnt increase too much
A 1600 at 3.8Ghz will consume about as much as the 1600x

>>60241469
Because a 1600 at 3.8 is similar to a stock 1600X

>>60241086
>an art
spotted the newfag

>>60241211
>>60241224
When AMD beat Intel to hitting 1GHz, Tom's Hardware did this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NxNUK3U73SI

Seems bad, right?
Not when you learn they went into the BIOS and disable thermal protection for the AMD CPU but not the Intel one. If thermal protection was left on, it would have underclocked and kept from burning itself just like the Pentium.

They are desperate, desperate shills. Always have been. Always will be.
If you read the review, they actually recommend buying a Z270 board with the i3-7100.

>>60241576
Reminds me of the latest TPU review of Ryzen done on a $90 motherboard with no EFI updates against a $250 Z Intel motheboard

>>60241604
Funny how you street shitters always compare z270 prices to lowest end a300 amd motherboards but never put in the price of a x370z

>>60241622
Because you don't need a X370 motherboard even for overclocking.

>>60241604
Yep. TPU are the other big shill site when it comes to English ones.

What TPU also does is they'll tweak settings to make things GPU bottlenecked in games where R5 outperforms i5. But when i5 outperforms R5? They drop the settings to make sure it can get a higher average.
Which they can't do at 4k, and you see 1600X take the lead at 4K in their averages.

It's VERY easy to make data show what you want it to show like that. You can't trust these shills results at all. They may as well be completely faking the data, even though they're not, but it's the same end result of making something to manipulate rather than educate people.

>>60241622
Because a $90 B350 has the same features as a $115 Z270. And a $240 X370 has the same features as a $350 Z270.
It's funny how much you expose your ignorance by saying that.

>>60241632
Overclocking on any amd board is a gimmick since ryzens can't overclock anyway

>>60241622
Because outside of wasting money on shit like WiFi or Ln2, X motherboards are pointless.
And if you're not planning on overclocking at all, getting the cheapest mobo you can find that fits your feature list is a great choice, it's only by good luck and not total vendor jewish tricks that you can do a 30% OC on a 1700/1600 on a $100 motherboard since the VRMs seem more than potent enough

>>60241638
>And a $240 X370 has the same features as a $350 Z270

Source?

>>60241661
Look at the PCBs and features list, ignorant kid.

>>60241678
I have and you're full of poo

X370 motherboards are not for you, they're for the dumb illiterate fucks that can't read a spec sheet to save their life, unless you really need the extra I/O from X370 and the overpowered power delivery but that's so beyond a minority it's not even worth talking about.

Even that $90 cheapo AB350 Asrock board, which is one of the worse ones in VRM specs, can handle a 200A+ load from Ryzen, and those CPUs aren't gonna use more than 120A unless you push 1.5V

>>60241692
For comparison a fucking Taichi can do a 400A+ load, that's so fucking overkill not even Ln2 gets close to pulling that.

>>60241692
>>60241702
>tfw amd releases faildozer again and your shitboards will be useless

>>60241711
AMD's new architecture is out in 2021 and it's not gonna be AM4 compatible due to DDR5 and PCIe 4.0

You make no sense

>>60239115
This list is wrong even for Intel only CPUs.

>>60241724
what? they are updating arch every year.
and 2019 is pretty much confirmed to be on IBM's 7nm process and clock 10% higher.

>>60241852
NEW ARCHITECTURE you bumfuck, as in Nehalem > SB. Not Zen > Zen1/2/3/whatever, those aren't new architectures, they're revisions of the same uarch

>>60241852
Zen+ is expected in Q1/2 2018, so a fuller featured Zen, 15% IPC gain target. Not sure how that'll work out considering Zen hit 52% over Steamroller, rather than the expected 40%.

>>60241875
Even in 4 years of Zen, you still couldn't squeeze out all the blood left in that stone, so they'll do fine.
Even Intel can still get a few % from an arch that still has ties to P6 like SB

>>60241724
>2021
That sounds way too fast.

I was just looking at this earlier and thought "wow they really sold out to shintill"

>>60241875

>rather than the expected 40%.

It is because AMD's SMT is superior to Intel's (though the grand champion of SMT is still IBM's useage in POWER8). In practical terms each zen core is "wide" enough that there is no downside to having SMT on - it nearly always gives a good performance gain. Kabylake is "narrower" so hyperthreading can still give negative scaling at times.

>>60241888
They said so themselves, they can't really go further than that due to pcie 4.0 and DDR5

Either way 4 years looks like a good time to move on to something else more potent with the increasing size of datacenter, and computing requirements keep going up, I don't see the problem other than money.

>>60241906
Oh you mean, they will have new chipsets.

>>60241916
Are you braindead? chipsets/SB hasn't handled memory or PCIe for years.

No.
New arch, new socket.

>>60241875
>15% IPC gain target. Not sure how that'll work out considering Zen hit 52% over Steamroller
No one ever said 15% IPC gain for Zen2.
They said 20% performance increase which can be from a combination of higher clocks and IPC.
It could be 10% higher IPC and 8.5% higher clock, for example.

>>60241888
Na 3-4 years for a new arch is normal unless you're Intel and just don't make a new Arch ever again.
They started working on Zen in 2013 iirc.

>>60241926
You see, "New Arch" people think not Ryzen.
We still call KabyLake same Arch as Sandy Bridge.
as for "Not AM4" 40% of Current Ryzen CPUs Pins are N/C

>>60240305
is this an overclocking guide? what does the super glue and laquer do?

>>60241489
Exactly
Might as well save the dosh

>>60242577
You're saving nothing, a 1600X can be run on the cheapest of cheap nigger-tier <$70 motherboards at stock, the 1600 needs slightly more potent VRMs and that's $100 on the mobo at least

>buy a Presshot instead of A64


t. Tom's Kikeware

>>60239224
The thing is, how can AMD compete?
The only way I see them beating such a golden CPU as the G4560 would be releasing 4C/4T CPUs at around the same price, and that's just not happening.

>>60240305
Terrible as in "still better than the PS4/X1".

>>60242957

Technically the fx 6300 is same price as the g4560 so its doing more then competing with it... amd is crushing intel!!!!

File: intel_which_cpu_for_you.jpg (440KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1280x960px

>>60239115
Oy vey!

>>60239115

>7100 and 7500 on the list of best cpu's

Fucking really?

>>60243201
design your own website...need i7...

>>60243341
I guess modern IDEs are so bloated you need a i7 to scroll down

>>60243341
interactive social networking...need i5...

>>60239332
Oh wow, can't believe they realize that.

>>60240114
Great! >>>/r*ddit/ is that way

File: 1390828528617.jpg (43KB, 255x233px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 255x233px

When did you learn to stop paying attention to Tom's Hardware?
For me it was in 2004 when they were shilling the shit out of the GeForce FX cards and recommending abominations like the FX 5600 over the older, but better 4 Ti and the even better Radeon R300 based cards.

>>60243422
When they shilled Presshot

>>60243422
"Buy bentium 4 goy"


Around that time.

>>60239115

Holy fuck the comments section on that. Even a referee at a footbal match doesn't get called out as much as that.

>>60239395
>I own an i3-6100 btw.
Literal cuck.

>>60241867
SB isn't really a new architecture over Nehalem.
Nehalem was their first chip with an IMC. Sandy Bridge was the second generation of the same basic architecture, which made significant gains because there was a lot of low hanging fruit, because Nehalem was a new architecture. Just like this first generation of Zen processors.

The next Zen iteration will make significant increases too, because Zen is a first generation architecture and there's a lot of low hanging fruit to improve upon.

>>60239304
Don't listen to the retards. If the cache per core has been neutered, then skip it.

>>60239313
fuck off from /g/ with those shitty benchmarks

>>60239313
>8350 above r7

I can't tell you how discarded your opinion is, it literally doesn't exist in my world

>>60239304
That's what the "G" is for. It stands for "Gimped".

>>60241952
>You see, "New Arch" people think not Ryzen.
Yes, that's exactly what he's saying. An entirely new architecture in 2021 on a brand new socket.
>We still call KabyLake same Arch as Sandy Bridge.
Because they are the same. In the same fashion, we will be getting incremental updates to the Ryzen architecture every year leading up to 2021. Ryzen 2.0 is coming next year still on the AM4 socket.

Is this more clear?

>>60245486
It's Zen. Ryzen is consumer SKUs.

>>60245635
Right, my bad.
Incremental updates to the Zen architecture.

>>60244207
Serious question, is it okay to report people when they're being obviously misleading posting those rigged turkish benchmarks?

>>60243422
It was when they were shilling the P4 BEFORE IT EVEN CAME OUT against the cheaper and godly Athlon Tbirds even after P4 came out and was shown to be garbage.

I was only fucking 13 years old when I learned not to trust those dumb shills.

God damn I loved my Tbird 1.33. I actually want to cry everytime I think of it and miss it. :(

>>60239332
Oy vey, the goyim know!

SHUT

IT

DOWN

>unemployed street shitters have all day to sit on tomshardware comment section shilling their DOA bulldozer 2.0 travesty of a CPU
>hardworking white men buy intel and enjoy superior speed, temps, power usage and noise levels

File: 1492463302260.jpg (205KB, 1600x917px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 1600x917px

>>60246163
Hard working at diversity, white cucks unite

>>60246163
My wife's son is really enjoying his new i3-7350K(ucked).

File: 1485646475518.jpg (51KB, 550x520px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 550x520px

>>60240114
OK schlomo

>>60246211
>>60246211
>>60246211
They should really invest in R&D than diversity quotas and feminist frequency, that self-driving car meme 15B acquisition looked pretty dumb as well, paying that much money to join in a overly populated market where ARM rips apart on price and release cadence.

>>60246212
>>60246211
>intel so far ahead of amd they can literally slow down and have a rest

LMFAO

https://www.amazon.co.uk/d/ndv/Intel-Core-4790K-1150-Haswell-Refresh-Processor/B00KPRWAX8/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1494092456&sr=8-1&keywords=intel+4770k

I save £22!

Daqfuq is going on?

File: 0bbfddc9c03fc4bd3a3e23af32ea82fc7add863410095522d433d8c3fe46b60e.gif (365KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2000x1153px

>>60246163
>Resorting to evidence free greentexts because kiketel has been getting BTFO'd out left and right

>>60246875
Oh and I paid £239.99 back in 2013 for mine. It's gone up! lol

File: 1494042988777.jpg (10KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x200px

>>60240114

>>60240114
>photographs

File: 1494006792308.jpg (9KB, 256x197px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 256x197px

>>60239325

>>60239115
Sometimes you have to be subtle about sucking advertiser dick.

>>60239115
Just lol @ Poozen

What a fucking failure

Please just fucking die already AMD so we can be done with this shit

File: mvg.png (185KB, 658x768px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 658x768px

>>60247924

>>60247948
You realize AMD are the ones jewing you now with their overpriced Ryzen shit

File: my sides.png (173KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 640x400px

>>60246281
Yes, that's what they were doing for 5 years. Just resting.

>>60247979
>$200 6 core
>overpriced
nice try shlomo

File: good goy.png (604KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 800x523px

>>60247979

File: cores.jpg (97KB, 558x695px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 558x695px

>>60248003
>muh cores

Intel is killing AMD in price-performance, it's fucking sad

AMD was supposed to be the budget brand, but they come out with overpriced Ryzen and their stock plummets

>>60247990

Remember /g/'s mantra before ryzen released.

>just wait™ Intel has wharehouses full of hugely better cpus waiting to come out and bury AMD once again!

Turns out Intel really did do fuck all for 5 years and are now scrambling with housefire-X that makes zero sense. I simply cannot wait for the 7740k!

>>60248031
Intel isn't scrambling, they don't even care at all, they didn't even lower their prices a cent.

AMD is just going along their fail train just like usual, nothing has changed.

File: perfrel_cpu.png (31KB, 500x610px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x610px

>>60248022
then you faced reality

>>60248095
>inb4 ape noises: the game gets posted as a defense

>>60248095
TPU is a shitty site.

>>60248095
Then you faced reality >>60241076

File: perfrel_1920_1080.png (17KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 500x330px

>>60248095
Really makes you think

>>60248191
>Price/performance
Kek.

>>60239332
>fake reviewing
AMD shills are very desperate.
Sad!

>>60248243
>Games
>7%
This isn't the board you're looking for, anon.

>>60248277
AMD shills are just like the insane libtards that scream Russia about everything

>>60241076
This gets posted in every fucking thread, and it never gets any less stupid
>IMG_xxxx
Oh yeah, it's that faggot again.

File: photoshop-r5.png (171KB, 723x554px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 723x554px

>>60248284
>he thinks it's just games

>>60248290
>meanwhile Intel donates to femminist frequency and recently brought in a new Chief Diversity Officer (black) to and I quote: " diversify itself by 2020"

>>60248309
Top Kek, anon. Amazing effort.
>>60239761

Report and move on.

File: amd-commies.jpg (980KB, 2000x1477px) Image search: [Google]

980KB, 2000x1477px

>>60248311
Yes good goy, support AMD and remember to go to your local protest!

Resist!

>>60239115
Good goyim.

>>60248309
>he thinks photoshop's shitty single threaded code matters

File: chrome.png (44KB, 650x350px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x350px

>>60248332
You realize that almost all programs function the same way, which is why Ryzen fails at so much.

>>60248309
>R5 1600X BTFO'ing i7-6800K
Feels good.

>>60248031
Don't forget the i7-6850K rebranded as a consumer CPU that still costs more than a 1600X, runs twice as hot and loses it's single core and OC advantage.

File: 1493833769707.png (56KB, 531x819px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 531x819px

>>60248309
0.50 seconds

Meanwhile in corelet land

>>60248191
no one cares about that shitty graph you made autist

File: 1458481023145.png (383KB, 558x568px) Image search: [Google]

383KB, 558x568px

>>60240114
Oy vey

>>60248362
AMDtards sure do hate facts

>>60248352
>>60248320
Come on, anon. Quit posting shitty benchmarks.

>>60248352
>he thinks shitty "web benchmarks" matter
>he thinks loading bloated web 4.0 sites 0.2 seconds faster matters

Report.

>>60241211
Salty /g/ and /r/amd niggers making up stories to assuage their buyer's remorse

LOVING EVERY LAUGH

File: autocad.png (175KB, 725x548px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 725x548px

>>60248373
Sure are a lot of shitty benchmarks out there, they must be all fake!

>>60248372
>facts
the holocaust didnt happen shlomo now get lost

File: 1493292221665.jpg (2MB, 766x8714px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 766x8714px

>>60248386

>>60248408
Nice cherrypicking

File: download.jpg (9KB, 257x196px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 257x196px

>>60248385
>LAUGH

>>60248406
Better go back to r3ddit where you can censor those inconvenient facts

File: delidding intensifies.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>60248385
>i-it was made up!

>>60248431
>literally the entire bench marking suite
>nice cherrypicking
lol

>>60248431
So transparent.

File: excel.png (27KB, 500x450px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x450px

>>60248408
Oy vey, why does Ryzen keep failing worse than Hillary's campaign?

>>60248436
>the holocaust happened
intelaviv everyone, REMEBER MUH 6 GORIILIAN

>>60243569
Right? Salty AMD cucks are so sad

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-Python-Linux-Kernel-Compile-Benchmark.jpg (71KB, 879x565px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 879x565px

>>60248453
Where

File: 1493462336560.png (1MB, 1002x1480px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1002x1480px

>>60248453
>macroshit
wrong board kiddo

File: solidworks.png (166KB, 734x556px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 734x556px

>>60248458
Where

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-c-ray-1.1-Benchmarks.jpg (70KB, 857x522px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 857x522px

>>60248458
Were

File: Excel.png (60KB, 1305x1434px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1305x1434px

>>60248453
Wow it's almost like shillpowerup used a completely biased and retarded benchmark for Excel.

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-7-zip-Compression-Benchmark.jpg (93KB, 822x745px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 822x745px

>>60248478
You

File: ryzen-16-games-average.png (61KB, 1306x1646px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1306x1646px

>>60248479
Oy vey, maybe you shouldn't have posted shillpowerup benchmarks earlier schlomo?

Let's go look at some reputable ones...

OH NO

>>60248496
Nice day one 1080p muh gaymes faggot.

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-NAMD-Benchmarks.jpg (79KB, 854x570px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 854x570px

When

>>60248476
>intel i7 better than extreme edition
INTEL BTFO BY INTEL HOW WILL INTEL EVER RECOVER

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-OpenSSL-Sign-Benchmark.jpg (88KB, 859x587px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 859x587px

>>60248513
AMD

>>60248520
INTEL BTFO

INTEL WINS

Same pattern, every thread, starts out with gaymer shit, moves on to MT, then he tries to convince you that everything is ST based on single photoshop filter and a AutoCAD bench, then when he realizes that's not working he falls back to day 1 gayming benchmarks from pcgamer/digitalfoundry/some youtube nigger

Just report.

>>60248513
>Intel's 16 core 32 thread barely beats AMD's consumer 8 core 16 thread

This isn't telling the story you're hoping for, retard.

>>60248496
>Muh gaymbs
>day 1
fake news

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-sysbench-CPU-Benchmarks.jpg (75KB, 856x489px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 856x489px

>>60248525
BTFO'd

>>60248538
DELID

>>60248537
DELET

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-OpenSSL-Verify-Benchmark (1).jpg (87KB, 858x591px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 858x591px

>>60248545
Intel

>The AMD can execute six micro-ops per clock while Intel can do only four. But there is a problem with doing so many operations per clock cycle. It is not possible to do two instructions simultaneously if the second instruction depends on the result of the first instruction, of course. The high throughput of the processor puts an increased burden on the programmer and the compiler to avoid long dependency chains. The maximum throughput can only be obtained if there are many independent instructions that can be executed simultaneously.

http://www.agner.org/optimize/blog/read.php?i=838

Last

File: ryzen-5-average-gaming.png (75KB, 600x865px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 600x865px

>>60248539
Oh noes, would you like some recent benchmarks, surely it will be much better for Ryzen now that they fixed all the bugs

OH GOD NO

>>60248571
>AMD ramblings on a random blog

File: AMD-Ryzen-7-1800X-UnixBench-dhrystone-2-Benchmarks (1).jpg (77KB, 858x577px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 858x577px

>>60248577
Damn It

>Gaymes

>>60248589
AMD fags are hilarious, they will search all day for the most obscure sources to try to find some propaganda to support their shitty dying company

File: ss.jpg (69KB, 856x548px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 856x548px

>>60248592
One

>>60248579
According to that I should get the cheapest i3/r5 1500 and overclock them since they'll do the same as a 7700k/1800X at 1440p

>>60248579

So what ytou are saying is anything above a 7600k is worthless because 3fps falls into margin of error.

Life is suffering for AMD fans. Feels good to be a hardworking white man who bought a 7700k instead

>>60248618
This desu senpai

I just sit here and laugh at these amd fags who spend all day coming up with rationalizations for their inferior processors

>>60248618
But kikes are no different from mudfilth, if you were white you wouldn’t have faced extermination some 75 years ago

>>60248579
>day 1 ryzen 5 benchmark
WEW

>>60248589
back to /v/ child

>>60248599
Agner? Random blog?

You've gotta go back to /v/

>>60248650
Oh yes I forgot we've got to give AMD at least 2 months before you can review their products

AMD products are never ready on launch, they are riddled with bugs.

Just wait...just keep waiting....surely after a few month, a year, maybe a century, then AMD will make Ryzen work right.

>>60248657

Nobody on /g/ has any idea who Agner Fog is nor what he does.

File: s.png (12KB, 1656x60px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 1656x60px

>>60248589
>>60248599
Where were you when Intel shills forgot all about based Agner?

>>60248679
Ask in DPT, thought I doubt anyone there works with SIMD at all.

Regardless, /v/ermin should go back.

>>60248657
You've got to go back to r3ddit

>>60248694
He already posted his optimization manual, why post an old post?

>>60248694
Where were you when AMD shills are still trying to spread their propaganda all over the internet in the hope that their pathetic stock monies will go up?

File: gg.png (486KB, 648x755px) Image search: [Google]

486KB, 648x755px

>>60248677
Kek. This.

On an unrelated question, when will Intel fix their shitty TIM situation?
http://www.pcgamer.com/intels-tells-core-i7-7700k-owners-to-stop-overclocking-to-avoid-high-temps/

>>60248717
It's already up, around 400% YoY :)

File: lol.png (24KB, 628x462px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 628x462px

>>60248732
To the moon!

Keep on shilling for AMD, it's going great!

>>60248760
Reminds me of Nvidia's 20% drop 2 months ago.

>>60248760
Looks like a good time to buy, I wish it fell under $9, guess I failed when I thought it would drop that much when it hit under $10

>>60248760
Ayyy, seems like it's time to buy :)

>>60248777
Better invest in Nvidia then, sounds like they are doing just as great as AMD!

>>60248815
>Buying Nvidia stocks
>Ever

>>60248815
Nvidia was overvalued like AMD was, Nvidia can expect healthy revenue growth but that won't skyrocket its stock, AMD's will be volatile until Q4 this year so if you're smart enough you'll rake in some good money.

>>60248731
Kek.
>Buy 7700K
>Overclock
>Shitty temp
>No fix
>Need to delid
>Breaks CPU in the process

File: nvidia.png (30KB, 626x454px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 626x454px

>>60248822
Weird, why does Nvidia's stock look so much better than AMD's?

>>60248832
>if you shill for AMD for 24 hours a day on online, maybe you can trick people into thinking AMD stock is good!

Fixed that for you.

File: 2016-05-08 13.22.46.jpg (43KB, 473x672px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 473x672px

>this cpu doesn't make it on "x" site therefore it's shit haha "x" BTFO!!!!
Autism.

>>60248760
Looks like it stabilized, shorters got out, all that's left are holders, which I say is about fucking time since AMD seemed to be the #1 stock for twitchy RH "investors".
Looks like some actually predict a $20 EoY, but I wager it's more closer to $17 if Q2 and Q3 are good.

File: 1486328545087.png (35KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 625x626px

>>60248869
>buying hardware stocks at all

>>60248910
They're easy money if you follow the market.

Literally everyone in this thread is a fag. A bit fat cockslurping, assramming faggot that has taken miles of dick up the ol' poop chute.

>>60248910
Are you dumb? You know how much fucking money you could have made from Nvidia and AMD in the last 14 months?

File: chart.png (244KB, 1200x2218px) Image search: [Google]

244KB, 1200x2218px

>>60248309
>Photoshop

File: Screenshot_from_03052017_154841.png (84KB, 884x863px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 884x863px

>>60248352
>Almost all programs

>>60249000
Mhmm, Adobe updated Premiere Pro recently, they should do the same for PS, I hope.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9SDgZr-Xt4

But damn they're slow

>>60248968
some poster became rich due to this board, he said he invested all of his bitcoins ( 30k worth was the number i think) into AMD stock when stock was 2 dollars.

File: Untitledd.png (36KB, 633x613px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 633x613px

>>60248386

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170426_154238.jpg (2MB, 2539x1446px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2539x1446px

>>60248496

>>60249060
Hopefully he sold when they were on $14

Still, even at $10 he made mad bux, just waiting this out for another year would probably get AMD to $15, I don't expect any large fluctuations anymore after the market stabilized itself

>>60239115
>It's another "v-tard can't shitpost on /v/ because no one will understand him" episode

>>60239166
Neither does most software unfortunately

File: 1487730850625.jpg (20KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x360px

>>60248053
>they didn't even lower prices a cent
ahahaha
>mfw intel cucks constantly manage to showcase their stupidity and ignorance to technology

File: 1700X 7700K 1080p crysis 3.jpg (423KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1920x1080px

ryzen should tm 'buttery smooth'

>>60248679
>Nobody on /v/ has any idea who Agner Fog is nor what he does.
ftfy

>>60248869
more value =/= better investment

>>60248968
>could have

>>60249356
>Nobody on {/b/,/v/} has any idea at all

ftfy

File: 1468974476103.jpg (40KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 600x600px

amd is my life

fuck you guys

>>60249399
Yes? Now that the stock has stabilized, it's no longer a hot investment, as of now, like many stocks out there AMD is a longterm investment, not a get rich quick stock it was a year ago

>>60249563
>1700X

Literally the worst Ryzen 7 chip to choose, if it was $50 cheaper It'd be a steal

>>60249579

The 1700x exists simply because its the dies that can't pass validation as a 1700 nor clock high enough to be a 1800x.

>>60249579
it is, its about $350 now

>>60243109
can't tell if sarcasm or actually serious

>>60243341
How else are you going to run your bloated js

>>60249924
this. amazon has for $357.80, kinda wishing i didnt get the fractal design define r5 before the CPU now, hopefully the price holds a bit

File: Define R4.jpg (157KB, 1300x975px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1300x975px

>>60250593

The R5 is a god tier case.

>>60250951
>define r4
that ain't a r5

File: FD-CA-DEFR5-BKO-W-la.jpg (583KB, 960x5228px) Image search: [Google]

583KB, 960x5228px

>>60250951
I got the new version with window ;3

>>60251002
>Window

Disgusting.

I got one of the older versions with the reset button behind the door and only one USB 3.0 + 2x USB 2.0

>>60250995

They look the same externally unless you are a window faggot.

>>60249261
The funniest thing about it is those dips are caused by thermal throttle from Intels cheaper manufacturing.

>>60239115

Everything on a "free" website is payed for. everything. Including reviews and recommandations.