How is Intel gonna compete without its fab advantage?

>>60232605
>14nm++
Another 5% performance increase? Another 5% performance increase.

>>60232715
>5%
If only.

>>60232715
You are an optimist man.
No performance increase.
Just increment the number of the generation and rebrand.
> Let us introduce the new X generation of the cpu, which named the Y Lake.

>>60232605
Man GloFo is moving at fucking SANIC speed.

>>60232605
With a new architecture

[spoiler]
Lmao[/spoiler]

>>60232885
well, why be stubborn and invent a wheel if you can just buy IBM tech process?

>>60232919
>buy
It's theirs since IBM merged fabs with GloFo.

>>60232605
Holy shit GloFo

Didn't they say Intel's 10nm will be lower performance than their 14nm?

>>60235136
Yes, and it will be low power laptop parts at first.

>>60232605
>Zen+ by mid 2018 followed by Zen+ refresh at 7nm by mid 2018
Holy fuck how is Intel even supposed to compete?
We're easily looking at a minimum 20% performance increase over Intel anything by Zen+ 7nm, and Intel literally has nothing in the pipeline for server/performance until their new arch and their new process gets delayed all the time
At least the difference between GloFo and TSMC won't be mayor, the difference between Nvidia and AMD will be mostly down to arch's

>>60232919
IBM payed glofo to take it

>>60232605
Well time to sell all intlel stocks now

>>60238004
>Holy fuck how is Intel even supposed to compete?
Step 1. Build a time machine
Step 2. Go back to 2013 and start working on new arch

>>60232715
(((((((((((((((5%)))))))))))))))

>>60238004
Never trust glofo. They always overpromise and underdeliver.

>>60239974
You could had said the same about TSMC in the past, GloFo with IBM's tech and Samsung's assistance seems pretty solid

>>60232605
POOTEL IS FINISHED

>>60232885
helps when you have qatar and uae behind to push money

and when they occassionally fucks amd plans and release a product that can burn the sun they dont have to pay much it seems

by partnering with Tom's hardware

>>60232605
Wow, what exciting times we're living in. We're getting close to CMOS limits

>>60239974
Actually a few weeks ago they said they could bring 7nm DUV a quarter earlier than expected, so it seems to be going great.

File: 325160031939.jpg (30KB, 489x426px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 489x426px

>>60232605
>14nm
>14nm+
>14nm++

Aren't they at least a little embarrassed?
Especially when Kaby Lake's 14nm+™ performed exactly the same as Skylake's regular old 14nm.

>>60242212
Shut up stupid goy

>>60242212
So 14nm must be better than 14nm++, right?

>>60232605
RIPtel