Static Webm Thread? /SWT/

File: sweating-pepe.jpg (8KB, 218x218px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 218x218px

I have a macbook, does it really do this?

>>60222261
>hur dur fuck up file and save 2 kb!!!
Kill yourself.

File: 1484950567535.png (166KB, 704x783px) Image search: [Google]

166KB, 704x783px

>>60222284
This is the original PNG file. It's 116KB bigger.

>>60222261
write a script that compiles all the pngs in that directory into a single webm and maybe you'll have a fun thread

>>60222273
Yup, this is why you should bootcamp windows 7 on it ASAP. mac os for non-important things and windows 7 for important things.

>>60222306
>write a script that compiles all the pngs in that directory into a single webm and maybe you'll have a fun thread
for what purpose?

File: Capture.png (2KB, 299x61px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 299x61px

>>60222297
>116KB
Thank god for that, I was worried I was going to run out of space.
>mfw dumb NEETfag thinks saving 116KB is some kind of epic feat

>>60222317
because it's silly enough that other people might do run it and post the results for a giggle

>>60222261
>intentionally programmed to delete private data

That sounds illegal?

>>60222334
If everyone in the world cut their file sizes in half then data storage would be 50% cheaper.

>>60222369
>data storage would be 50% cheaper
Magic.
>cut their file sizes in half
Yeah, let me just cut this ISO in half. Maybe it will still work.

File: 1445929737796.jpg (219KB, 1224x1445px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1224x1445px

>>60222334
this is the most autistic argument i have seen all day
congrats

>>60222381
>you can't compress an ISO

File: TERABYTESOFPORN.png (18KB, 843x173px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 843x173px

>>60222334
you are like a little baby

watch this

>>60222307
> windows for important things
You're a fucking joke.

>>60222369
4chan already supports an actual lossy image format. it's called jpeg.
VP8 does not beat jpeg and that's one of the reasons that Firefox doesn't support WebP (the actual image format not some hacked WebM):
https://research.mozilla.org/2013/10/17/studying-lossy-image-compression-efficiency/

>>60222417
Just you wait motherfucker. If I wasn't getting so much overtime I'd have a 24 TB ZFS share.

>>60222441
Nope, I'm being as serious as a heart attack. I have a macbook 2013 and I can only get work done on it when I boot windows 7 on it. Everything else werks good enough on mac os.

Apple can design good hardware but their software isn't as good as it should be.

>>60222513
>Applel can design good hardware
The day pigs get RGB lighting

>>60222464
>2013
retard

>>60222534
Well the 2013 macbook turned out ok. Can't vouch for the overheating donglebooks apple has made thereafter.

File: 109234870192834614.webm (40KB, 486x569px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 486x569px

C'mon guys at least try the script, it doesn't make mustard gas. i promis

This is retarded. Hope when you die, it's a painful death.

File: 1491978272889.jpg (35KB, 459x451px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 459x451px

So much effort for next to no gain.

>>60222758
So you don't care about 4chin images loading faster on your device? Alright, guess this isn't really a tech board anymore. Maybe I should leave this shitty place for good.

>>60222787
WAAAAAAAA CRYY LITTLE BABY CRY US SOME ALLIGATOR TEARS

>>60222417
lol you think that's a lot

>>60222867
post your storage if its so great

>>60222911
no u

File: out.webm (2MB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x480px

>>60222306
that's pretty easy actually

>>60222968
elins a cute

>>60222787
No. No, I don't care about that. They load fast enough for me to notice. On my device. You retarded mobile poster.

File: image3410.png (2MB, 640x3360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 640x3360px

>>60222968
wot in tarnation...

File: thumb0183.png (207KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 640x480px

>>60222968
>386 images into 2.2MB
Okay I am impress. Can you post the script anon? That's batshit crazy.

Script to extract images for everyone else:

ffmpeg -i input.webm thumb%04d.png

>>60222261
What if you make a PNG out of that Webm and then turn THAT PNG into a Webm

INFINITE
ENERGY

>>60222261
why is this a webm?

>>60222464
jpeg is shit compared to webp/webm

>>60223531
I agree. Why?

>>60223531
>>60223555
hella good compression

>>60222554
nothing changed for VP8 since then due to google abandoning it

>>60223535
repeating lies in the face of an actual study makes you look stupid

>>60223566
please check your eyes, that compression is far from transparent and blurry

>>60223531
to kill your battery with endlessly decoding VP8 that's non-hw-accelerated on most CPUs

File: 1469309230745.png (2MB, 1011x3032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1011x3032px

>>60223598
You know ebay uses it now, right? Also it's been extensively improved. See pic related.

>>60223629
Check again you retard. This webm gives my laptop i3 like 20% load at most.

>>60223632
you know the difference between VP8 and VP9?
4chan can't do VP9

>>60223646
No shit but webp was based on VP8's keyframe encoding.

motionless webm videos of images just show about how gopd webp would be if it was used

>>60223642
are you claiming WebM wasting 20% of your CPU isn't killing your battery compared to 0% for jpeg once it's rendered and cached?

>>60223665
>motionless webm videos of images just show about how gopd webp would be if it was used
that would assume same encoder, but cwebp and libvpx aren't.

>>60223701
It only peaks to 20% while loading it the first time, after that my cpu goes back to its idle 1-5% load even after minutes of the video being looped.

It's an

>>60222261
why not use, dare I say, jpeg?

>>60223632
which shitty jpeg encoder is gimp shipping with?
pretty sure it's not mozjpeg

>>60223769
The libturbo mozjpeg library was a huge failure. It causes a ton of compatability issues with web browsers/image editors and takes like 10 minutes to encode a single 1080p image in most computers.

>>60222261
>Apple deleted my music. No... Apple stole my music. Better headline!

>>60223786
if that's the measuring stick, what an epic failure is webp?

>>60223180
I want that illya pic

File: applel.png (15KB, 704x783px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 704x783px

>>60222297
oh yeah?

>>60224181
nvm found it

namonashi

wtf I cant zoom in on webm on my phone
this will never take off

>>60224257
share it

>>60224465
I just told you the artist

>>60224254
why does dithering always give me a warm fuzzy feeling?

File: fuck.jpg (48KB, 500x530px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x530px

>>60222261
Using a video format to turn images in lossy 1 second long loops.

Not pushing for FLIF that offers better compression, does both lossy and lossless and animated images.

The gook should make /flif/ instead of adding all these new useless boards.

>>60222297
How the fuck does that even work? How can Apple somehow delete shit off your hard drive?

>>60222441
>3D design, animation and rendering, cad, graphic design, finance and other enterprise software, video editing, audio editing and masterization
>on loonix

You are the joke

File: HorribleSubs_Kobayashisan_Chi_no_Maid_Dragon_10_720p.mkv_snapshot_03.26_2017.03.15_14.21.42.png (393KB, 462x497px) Image search: [Google]

393KB, 462x497px

>>60225672
Damn that's some tech-illiteracy, back to Rèddit with you!

>>60225985
This.
OSX is way better for designing and shit.

File: 1470611408688.jpg (73KB, 334x468px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 334x468px

>>60226061
>No drivers
>No latest GPU hardware compatibility
Might as well keep using Winshit like a pleb, senpai. Anything involving Graphics will be slow and stuck in the past…

Stop with the bullshit and just prove on a single image example that there is something out there better than jpeg. This whole thread is about lossy compression, right?

>>60222968
>blank image
I think your script is broken.

>>60224999
Nice trips, but webp has the benefit that it already works in any relevant browser. I'm on Opera 12.X and even it supports webp. FLIF would need some javascript hackery like bgp

This shit is real annoying. It technically being a video means that you can't do a lot of shit that you can easily do with an image, like easily zooming in a specific amount.

>>60227000
I'm the Opera12 fag and even I can do that with WEBMs. Your browser is shit.

>>60227081
How do you do it then? Ctrl+scroll?
Opera generally has weird progressive features though.

>>60222297
PNG is lossless, your webm is not.

File: indy_200s-c20eab301543d37f3db8f450889906c7fc72d1a6-s6-c30.jpg (50KB, 948x1175px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 948x1175px

>>60222968
even indy is disgusted by those artifacts

>>60227162
Yeah but 386 images in 2.2mb mang 0_o

>>60227543
Also you can fit 200 eggs in a standard plastic bag if you stomp on them, but what's the point?

>>60224254
>file size different when you download the jpg
thank you for proving my point

>>60227647
That's an average of 6KB/pic. JPG can't do that.

>>60227543
>386
One of them is blank.

>>60227757
So what? If the quality is garbage, I don't give a fuck how small the image is.

>>60227647
A really big omelette with extra protein?

>>60227879
Well I do. If gookmoot would allow webp then images would load faster. You might have a 1Gbps internet connection but 4chin is limited to serving you content to like 4mbps and on some busy days even slower than that.

In fact this is a big reason why ebay loads faster than other websites.

File: asmmns.png (71KB, 704x783px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 704x783px

>>60222297

>>60222719
please let this pic be real.

>>60222273

I would only touch mac as a ssh machine honestly. Its for people who need other people to manage their shit to keep it from fucking up. And yes that music thing is real though I am not sure if they got enough heat to stop it.

File: hdds.png (14KB, 1061x141px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 1061x141px

>>60222417

>>60228119
The ADF (Apple Defense Force) already poured cold water on it and denied it was Apple's problem.

>>60227993
VP8 is trash and because of it WebP's lossy mode was obsolete on arrival. We don't need more dead formats.

>>60223786
>10 minutes
Mozjpeg is pretty damn fast, aren't you talking about guetzli? Great encoder by the way.

>>60227993
>Well I do.
So you don't care if the quality is "garbage"? Then why not convert every image to a 1x1 white or black png of a few bytes? That's significantly smaller and you could technically say it's a compressed form of the previous picture. The quality is garbage though, but you don't care.

>>60228741
see >>60223632

>>60228785
Why?

>>60228792
Because webp uses the keyframe encoding tech from VP8.

>>60228812
That's why I need to see that? I already knew that. I don't see how that makes that post relevant.

>>60228022
Not the same image, you used lossy compression.

>>60228882
THIS

Op is stupid as fuck

File: compare.png (544KB, 1408x900px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1408x900px

Wow, I wonder why the """image""" in the Op is smaller.

Really makes you think.

>>60229158

He's probably the same autist who has been pushing the static WebMs for months. Countless times people have told him that his images look like shit, but he rathers to autistically save 100 Kb.

>>60222412
but you can

>>60229773
He has a Gmod that has a shill for webp in the load screen.

How long until CPU performance is strong enough that file compression can be a simple mathematical expression that equals the total file in binary?

Can't zoom on my phone.

>>60222334
i am pretty sure you hoard all you animu in 1080p.

>>60222513
In what ways does OSX prevent you from doing work?

>>60228159
>GB
>10^9B
>not (2^10)^3B

>>60229773
seems like only people with iShit devices care about webms.

>>60232671
lmao this

>pay ~$1000
>have to jump through numerous hoops to play q webm every time
god, what a joke

>>60222261
Why are you doing this? its retarded, ugly, breaks zoom, and breaks the click-to-close function of the site.
Are you really that much of a file size jew?

>>60222261
>>60222348
It was probably music that was illegally downloaded.
They probably did it so that people would "have to buy the music from the itunes store"

>>60222261
>have a hackintosh t420
>using the latest fag os
>delet itunes
>don't have this problem

>>60231487
10^9B is 1GB.
(2^10)^3B is 1GiB.
Windows incorrectly labels GiB as GB.

>>60228159
>2TB SSD
I didn't know those even existed.

>>60236311
There are a few 2TB SSD's. There's even a 4TB SSD from Samsung, too.

>>60236328
How expensive are those? Also, does there are any M.2 2TB SSDs?

>>60236367
bretty sure it's capped at 1.2tb

>>60236367
SATA:

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147441

https://www.pccasegear.com/products/32756/samsung-850-evo-2tb-ssd

M2:

https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820147598

https://www.pccasegear.com/products/37201/samsung-960-pro-nvme-m-2-2tb-ssd

>>60236422
>$700
>$1200

lol.

File: 地獄少女 disc9 レーベル.jpg (3MB, 2952x2952px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2952x2952px

Just use 96% 4:4:4 jpeg

File: shot.png (6KB, 270x87px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 270x87px

>>60222334
>>60222417
>>60228159
plebs out

>>60237003
kek'd

>>60237003
nice mspaint skills.

>>60237003
how

>>60237139
start -> run -> "mspaint.exe"