>x86 and derivatives are bloated Discuss.

>>60216176
Don't worry friend, Intel is here to debloat x86. http://wccftech.com/intel-developing-new-x86-uarch-succeed-core-generation/

>>60216203

>we're going to debloat by creating a new architecture in the same bloated instruction set

>iFunny

>>60216294
Stolen from another anon

>he doesnt own a Power8 desktop
This is why you lose, Anon.

Hurr bloat durrr
Would a newly developed instructionset result in higher performance? Assuming everything else stays the same

>>60216176
Grub2 doesn't have any coreutils, retard nigger.

Might as well put, using just the BIOS as well.

>>60217445
Dunno, maybe?
Can you ever really compare different ISAs given that they have to be implemented differently on silicon?
I'm sure you could design a better ISA, but would that on it's own mean your shitcode runs faster? Bear in mind, all good compilers have had thousands of man years poured into them just to make the code they output to run fast as hell on x86.