How does this image make you feel?
>>60206697
If there's an iMac "Pro" refresh you can bet your ass that someone somewhere is gonna find some way to rackmount it.
That's how I feel.
Feels as useful as getting normal rackmount servers covered in diamonds
>>60206697
There's just no way that is a cost effective server solution... right?
>>60206697
They should have installed ejection handles on the cans for aesthetics
>>60206705
>>60206767
ios/mac development requires macs. Though I think using racked mac minis is more cost- and space-efficient
They're probably not even a company anymore.
Startups don't last very long, especially not your dime a dozen VPS hosting companies.
>>60206822
>Though I think using racked mac minis is more cost- and space-efficient
Racking Mac minis made some sort of sense, you can actually stuff quite a few in the space of 4U. Racking Mac Pros is the point where you start to wonder "okay but", and I bet if we see racked iMacs, it'll just be pure Tony Kornheiser "why".
>>60206697
We have about 2000 of them in these exact fucking racks we hate them. But fucking apple wont let us run fucking vm's. But we need to do testing on Mac OS, so we have no choice.
>>60206697
It looks cool. Doesn't evoke much feelings.
>>60206697
Seems absurdly costly and inefficient.
>>60206783
i want this image burned into my fucking retinas
>>60206697
Imagine how many more Macs you can cram into the same space when you use a thinner solution.
>>60206822
mac minis are significantly less powerful than mac pros.
With mac minis "loaded" with 16 gigs of ram you can run like 5 or 6 VMs before the cpu starts to choke up.
But with the mac pro you can easily run 20-30 vms on one system
Yo dawg! I heard you like wasting space?!
>>60208586
On the other hand you can put 16 Mac Minis into 4U compared to two Mac Pros
>>60206697
Fucking jealous. It's just missing some colour.
>>60206822
If you could hotswap an rack by simply unlocking via the theoretic handle, twisting, and pulling, that would be hella dope.
>>60208498
WHY
>>60206697
Makes me feel like cylinders are the worst shape for a server.
>>60208498
All the screens propped open instead of just changing the settings so closing the lid doesn't suspend
>>60206697
>>60208498
>>60208621
the worst kind of cancer
>>60209232
>mac
>change the settings
CDJs suck.
>>60206697
Weirdly aesthetic
>>60206697
>>60208498
>>60208589
>>60208621
Serious question: what's the purpose of such setups?
>>60209741
I guess people who are dependent on using Apple servers simply had to improvise after xServe and the rack-mountable MacPro got axed.
>>60209875
In other words people just got jewed hard and had no other choice, but bend over and spread their ass?
>>60210040
applefags gladly bend over
>>60208586
Ur the one who's getting choked up by Apple dicks
>>60208670
Holy shit, this. Especially with an unlocking sound and liquid nitrogen coming out, like a frozen virus sample.
>>60208670
Sadly that still doesn't justify the ~1k $ extra you have to shell out per unit for the same performance...
Makes me feel like you're a retard.
>>60211065
which is without the $800 rack mount
>>60206697
macfags gonna macfag, nothing else to say
>>60209741
If you're doing any kind of large scale software development you'll want to have proper testing setup for automated testing. You'll also want to run the tests in an environment that's as close to the production environment.
Maybe you're building desktop applications for macOS or want to ensure that macOS + Safari work out for your webapp. Maybe even with older versions of the OS and browser.
Well macOS license forbids running it on non Apple hardware even for development purposes. Apple doesn't make rackable servers either. Only thing you can do is buy their consumer stuff and try to manage it the best you can.
>>60209232
I guess it can help cooling those shitters so they don't throttle to 0,9GHz
>>60206697
reminds me of fuel rods in a nuclear reactor
probably runs just as hot
>>60206697
makes me miss xserve, those were aesthetic as fuck for rackmount kit
>>60206697
>>60208498
>>60208589
>>60208621
What the FUCK is going on here!?
I didn't even know Macs were usable for enterprise stuff.
>>60208498
Where are all the power adapters?
>>60212823
Two CPUs in 4U wont run hot at all.
>>60212744
But that's not illegal right? I mean, I understand that expecting IBM or Google to do hackintoshes is absurd, but then again so is this. A standard server rack with macOS VM's and then a final environment with actual Macs seems to make more sense to me.
>>60206697
I assume those are just for testing?
>>60206843
https://youtu.be/4jCtGRPNDtM
>>60208498
Ahahaha holy fuck what cancer. I love the propped open screens because OSX is inconsistent about waking on USB when the lid is closed no matter what you do with the settings.
>>60212971
>A standard server rack with macOS VM's and then a final environment with actual Macs seems to make more sense to me.
The company offering these is retarded as you imply.
>>60206783
I fucking hate this retard
>>60206697
Like I'm back in building 35 again...
>>60206697
makes me feel poor tbqh
>>60209288
There's an app for that, sweetie.
>>60213943
doesnt work.
if you have power connected you can do clamshell mode natively (but ONLY if you have power connected and run the dedicated gpu), however that picture looks like they have to overlap them like that to get 3 to fit
>>60208498
They even have to keep the screens open
>>60209288
>being too dumb to operate macOS
The ironing.
>>60211469
Nice picture
>>60212913
On the back.
>>60208621
Is that the new setup for hosting the 4chans?
>>60214236
>taking m00ts bait seriously
also nice get on that pic
>>60214275
>implying he's being serious
>>60214170
did they trash the boxes? They sell in ebay for like $25 if you have got all the manuals and documentation
>>60214523
>They sell in ebay for like $25 if you have got all the manuals and documentation
>>60214033
Show me how to do su root on macOS.
>>60212913
>Two CPUs in 4U wont run hot at all.
It was a comment on the trashcan's cooling capabilities, doubt the rack makes any difference aside from that fuel rod aesthetic
>>60212971
There is currently no virtualisation software that can run OSX with good performance.
>>60206697
Some people have more money than sense
>>60215097
>There is currently no virtualisation software that can run OSX with good performance.
Pretty much any can well. If you care about the GUI then you need to pass through a GPU.
>>60206697
For some reason this reminds me of the hal 9000. I just looked and he has little rectangular things but I feel like some part of it was can like objects.
>>60206822
>ios/mac development requires macs. Though I think using racked mac minis is more cost- and space-efficient
Even the apple developers have been caught with hackintoshes.
>>60206697
fine because i'm not a petty faggot
>>60214644% su - root
>>60206783
I love this guy unironically. He has the money to do stupid shit just for fun, and he has a ball doing it.
>>60214597
>Have macbook
>Try to sell it as new without box
>Or buy the box and manuals and sell it as a complete unit for much more because Normie autism
>>60208498
how the fuck do you even cool that
>>60212876
Apple should make the next Mac Pro rack mount thinshit
>>60206697
It does not.
>>60208498
Are those , dare I say it, ``dongles''?
>>60206697
There is much better hardware to put in a rack like that.
However, removing / adding cylindrical computers would be cool. Feels like something out of a science fiction movie.
>>60218448
Not when you need to use Macs
>>60208498
>>60206697
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA WHAT THE FUCK
>>60214275
>modget
>nice get
Fucking newfags.
>>60206783
shoo shoo server goblin
>>60206697
This is extremely common in the entertainment industry. The edit bays are connected to the macs with kvm over utp.
>>60216480
t. Linus
>>60206731
This
>>60206783
I hope those servers crush him in this picture.
>>60206697
Comfy
Except for knowing their price, the Mac pro is a nice computer