AACS 2.0 cracked?

big if true

I'd love to download more 4k content, but the 50+gb sizes really put me off.

>>60200621
why The Smurfs? : (

>>60200671
I'm personally not too concerned about that, I have 1gbps down and upload, as well as 19.5TB of storage.

I just hope it's not some screen capture BS again. I'll even take a full disc image, I've got the CPU time to encode it myself if i needed to.

>optical media in 2017

I guess some autists are going to seed that stuff for encoding/remuxing purposes.

>>60200817
That's really the only reason we care.

if you're going to encode it, at least encode from the highest quality source available, in this case it's a remux, which isn't possible without cracking AACS 2.0.

I'm tired of seeing "UHD" torrents where they just screen cap a 4k bluray and try to pass it off as just as good as a remux, or even an encode from a remux.

>>60200634
for you maybe

>While the audio seems to match, the Maximum Content Light Level and Maximum Frame-Average Light Level listed in the media info appear to be different, and the colors in the screenshots are off too

Yarp.

>>60201190
>Update: After reviewing the full file our expert source believes that the release is indeed a copied UHD Blu-Ray Disc

>people still buy 480p 720x480 DVDs in 2017

Colour me suprised.

Any hints on what could be released next? Maybe this was a one off exploit?