>Gosh, I sure do love Windows!

Whoumst'd've are you quoting?

>>60192887
>Whoumst'd've are you quoting?

Anyone with the last name Patel.

Ever since I toned down my gaming to a couple times a week (not on purpose, guess I'm just old) I really don't have any excuses to keep Windows.

I'm just a lazy nigger.

"I'll do it tomorrow™."

people who love windows are actually pretty rare

they're generally IT people with MCSE certs who haven't ever worked with anything else and I know a few people like that

98% of people don't give a flying fuck and use it out of necessity

>>60192872
I'd just like to interject for a moment. You appear to be using an element from this image in your post: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Richard_Stallman_by_Anders_Brenna_01.jpg
You may have done this accidentally, but you've violated the terms of its copyright license. This is a serious offense and I hope you take it as seriously as it deserves.
Not to say that you're not allowed to create derived works from this image, you are, but this picture is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Norway license. Therefor, you are free:

to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work;
to remix - to adapt the work;

Under the following condition:

attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

In this case, the attribution requirement is resolved simply by including the following in your post:

Anders Brenna [CC BY 3.0 no (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/no/deed.en)], via Wikimedia Commons

Now that you have read this, I hope you have a better understanding of your rights and obligations when remixing and sharing this work. They will let you edit, now be nice and credit~