There is already lobbying to outlaw sexbots

Everything gets lobbied. Worry about bills.

No

No

>>60183546
>muh sexbots
Why tough?

>>60183747
>Muh sex
Literally that.
Realistic sex partners are just the logical conclusion of dildos/fleshlights.

>>60183747
because sex is what humans want and not enough of us losers are getting it

>>60183546
What about male sex bots?

>>60183546
I recently wondered. When did that
>promotes objectification of living women
become an argument?
Do "women" have some sort of patent over how bodies are allowed to look like? And: Sexbots are not human, therefore not to be compared to "living women".

Needs to be seen. The Transhumanists seem far too open with their goals to not get betrayed on the way to see their dream burn to ground.

Not happening.

On a different note. I can see something happening that is portrayed in anime a lot: Some scientist or freak or such builds something that's not supposed to exist and noone will know about it.

>>60183546
If what you say is true, I see no reason not to go full nuclear on the chads and stacies

Good. Autists who need sex bots don't deserve happiness.

>>60183546
>Do you think we'll make it to a cyberpunk dystopia in our lifetimes?
been there for a while breh

>>60184802
I wouldn't say were there yet

>>60184895
You are a boiled frog

>>60184931
We don't even have cool uniforms or anything though

>>60184951
This.
I want a fucking neon leather jacket.

>>60184720

Anyone who can afford happiness deserves it. That's how capitalism works, Anon.