Grsec/PaX are dropping free support.

This is good. Grsecurity is stupid greedy jew faggot and can fuck off.

>>60167478
>https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2017-April/043604.html


Politics everyone. The ones who end up suffering are the Linux community at large. Now we're stuck with no updates for grsec and less secure systems. Not to mention that most of these protections will probably never get upstreamed if Linus and other maintainers have anything to say about it. And currently there's no better alternative.

Even other comparable projects like HardenedBSD and even OpenBSD don't have the same degree of protections enacted by grsec.

Discussion on Gentoo-Hardened

https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/eb59963be23c3054109fb2a28ae0de2b

>>60167478
there never was free support.
gcc plugins were always private and w/o it was easy to exploit:
https://twitter.com/paxteam/status/858446189624164352

We are fuck, again.

Fork when?

>>60170882
Will everyone be moving to Fedora or *BSD now?

File: 03.png (364KB, 582x554px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 582x554px

>mfw OpenBSD is secure by default
>mfw Linux cucks have to pay a license to get features you get in a base OpenBSD system

>>60170985
How is the state of OpenBSD with Nvidia in 2017?

>>60171230
did you really think you had to ask?
:
^
)

>>60171230

>build a secure PC
>hook a closed binary blob right into the kernel