What's a /g/ approved DNS?

just use google DNS like a good little goy

>>60132678
Precisely not if I can avoid it.

Seriously though, does nobody here care about the DNS they use at all?

opendns works for me

dnscrypt has a few good options.

https://developers.google.com/speed/public-dns/privacy

how is this anything to be concerned about

>>60133170
Because they definitely will comply 100% with what they say the do, right? Especially on a system that has never been, and most likely will never be, properly audited? Oh, (((they))) absolutely don't have a history of violating privacy and basically lying about it.

This may be tinfoil hattery, but if there are good alternatives I don't see why I shouldn't use them.

Will check out dnscrypt.

File: 1493470037673.jpg (54KB, 721x488px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 721x488px

opendns starting redirecting and blocking again so dropped for a different one.

>>60132586
Find any OpenNIC provider, they have access to shit not even google gives

File: 1490984091214.jpg (8KB, 190x188px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 190x188px

>>60133881
>allowing some random anon to have access to your personal data
>placing your trust in babby's first server reliably handling all your DNS quieries
>crossing your fingers, hoping they've implemented standard security procedures/infosec/hardening/etc, and that your data won't get pwned by some skid CIA nigger

>>60132586
OpenNIC with dnsmasq local cache so it is not slow as fuck.

>>60135907
Interesting, I'll look into this

>>60132586
Your own
Seriously getting BIND up is really easy. Just get an old computer and throw it in the closet and you're good.

>>60136082
There is a tutorial on the debian wiki.