GPL violations

so freetards are fine with stealing intellectual property

"hurr it'sll just 0's and 1's"

then they get upset when someone returns the favor?

>>60119135
Sorry, but that isn't a very rational argumentation. Maybe try again?

>>60119117
But there were precedents for enforcing the GPL.

Sure, there are lot's of violations out there.

>>60119117
>So why is RMS not doing anything against this?

Because it's not his program/his code. he has nothing to do with it.

Busybox devs sued a few embedded hardware manufacturers for using bb on their shit and not releasing the source code of the modifications they made.

>>60119205
So I guess you need some company that can effort suing if you want access to sources which they are enforced to provide. Great

>>60119117
Contact the FSF

>>60119274
>enforced
*obligated

File: rms_anime.jpg (63KB, 450x338px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 450x338px

>>60119117

Gnu devs are OG niggas who refuse to settle anything in court

>>60119278
I just did

File: stirner_enough.jpg (150KB, 523x452px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 523x452px

>>60119135
>stealing intellectual property

>>60119274

Yeah, and if you're not a big company you can talk to the FSF and they'll do it for you.

>>60119336

But really, this. It's rare that any of these cases ever gets to court, because the violator's lawyers look at the GPL, look at what the crooks are doing and then tell 'em "We're fucked. Better cough up the source code, or we're going out of business."