skiddy here

File: 1493227356948.jpg (44KB, 422x381px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 422x381px

depends

No. It scans the image/whatever is on the page. It doesn't execute anything on it. Its like taking a picture, nothing more.
"skiddy here" describes it perfectly. Research motherfucker, do it.

I guess the best you could do is embed https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EURion_constellation

>>60093620
>This doesn't involve filling buffers and manipulating them
>No processing is done on a piece of image processing hardware
Jesus, /g/

File: 1492922374878.png (390KB, 850x720px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 850x720px

>>60091276
10/10

>>60089756
you can embed qr codes that hotlink to phishing websites

Yes. Mostly you have drivers encapsulate your data well but you can modify the printer driver to send erroneous messages to the printer. Varies a lot what you can do but when that is in place (or you found a hole) you have made an exploit in printed paper.

File: list.jpg (112KB, 822x1024px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 822x1024px

>>60089756
http://malqr.shielder.it/

depends on the scanner

Yes. Chances are the injection won't work though, and buffer overflows won't work either.
It's a super long shot, since you're basically betting on a stupid bit of code somewhere in the scanning software pipeline that burps up a buffer overflow from a specific number of characters or something.

As for injection... input would be sanitised simply to make the scanner functional.

Doing this blind is nearly impossible. But if you had a copy of the code for the entire process then you'd probably be able to find something.

File: book.png (228KB, 1024x701px) Image search: [Google]

228KB, 1024x701px

>>60089756
You can certainly inject hacks into a book's metadata and have that bomb out.