how true is this

>>60089428
>comparing apples to oranges
Useless data that doesn't prove any point

>>60089428
>14k people
lmao how someone can take this seriously

>>60089447
why wouldn't you compare fruit when trying to recommend a fruit someone might want to buy????

b-b-b-b-b-b-b-b-but you just flash a new PajeetROM and perform a factory reset every 2-3 months and it's j-j-j-j-j-j-j-just f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-f-fine...! a-apple is for f-fags...!! w-who cares if it's superior in design and implementation, I associate it with normies and hipsters and girls and therefore it's not cool and because everything revolves around my brand associations and personal insecurities i can't enjoy good technology even though i'll criticize others for allegedly vapid and shallow opinions! t-t-t-t-t-that's why android's the best...!

ALSO SUPERPOWER 2020 GET OVER IT

;____;

File: 1491974263241.png (1MB, 1100x794px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1100x794px

>average android user

Correlation does not imply causation.

>>60089428
Partially makes sense.

iPhone is an expensive normie phone, while Android user base includes nerds and covers budget-phone consumers.

The "divorced" part makes little sense for a dating website tough.

File: Screenshot from 2017-04-26 22-02-00.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>60089529
>open up two different threads on two different boards and see two different pictures
>of the same guy
Is this some new meme I don't know about?

You can get an android for anywhere between $200-$800. Of course the average user's income is going to be dragged down. Why do people talk about it like it's a manufactured phone instead of an operating system?

>>60089518
damn dude

>>60089455
>14k people isn't a big enough sample size

It's more correlation than causation, but it sounds about right. Android devices are cheaper. I've never met a rich kid without an iphone.

>>60089428
>iOS
>the phone of elitists
>android
>average joe

File: 1493132514459.jpg (71KB, 606x747px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 606x747px

>>60089428

>Richer people buy more expensive phones

Shocker.

File: murica.png (243KB, 445x510px) Image search: [Google]

243KB, 445x510px

>>60089428
> Checks source
> From 14k ppl in the US
> IN THE US

Sorry OP, I lost.

>>60089455
>>60091969
>American education

File: 1493237823671.gif (2MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 300x300px

>>60089518

>>60089428
>In the IS
dropped

>iOS
>what fashionable person ever slums it with an Android anyway?
>financially irresponsible people looking to get something nice for cheap with 2 year installment plans
>tech saavy people might favor the smooth UI and don't care about ricing

>Android
>available everywhere because the OS is on every smartphone that isn't an iPhone
>as such, perfect for poorfags and Indians
>favored by DIY'ers because "muh custom ROMs"

I mean, sure.

>>60089518
android eternally BTFO

>>60089455

This.

The sample size is stupid small. And keep in mind - this is what your smartphone reveals about you if you are an AYI user. Being an AYI user is a far more important "dating habit" than being a redhead.

Further bullshit - they don't reveal how many IOS and how many Android users are within this 14k. For all you know, there might be 200 IOS users out of 14k here.

Sure, a choice between IOS and Android says something about you, something likely irrelevant. But this study reveals not a goddamn thing about it.

test

File: iPoor.png (328KB, 673x859px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 673x859px

Apple is a poor choice in more ways than one.

ignore this

File: 1491415682862.png (167KB, 358x358px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 358x358px

>>60093041
LOOK AT THIS NAMEFAG'S POST LMAO

>>60093052
I SAID IGNORE IT

>>60089428
Useless data.

It doesn't specify if an even number of iPhone and Android users were in the study. One can assume there were more Android users than iPhone users based on market share.

>>60089518
Looooooool

>>60089428
very
and that's not something to get assblasted about

>people with less money buy cheaper good
Gee, who would have guessed?

>>60093015
One of the things that sucks about the UK is how everyone is perpetually in debt, still buy iphones and overpriced goods, then randomly blame foreigners for everything.

>mfw iphone has become a surefire way of detecting the worst and poorest society has to offer
The biggest joke is when they lament they couldn't afford the iphone so they buy the latest galaxy S whatever instead. Some people never learn.

>>60090335
Faggot is trying to force a meme

>>60089428
>Labour or construction
>drink 50% less then tech
I find it's claims hard to believe.

>>60089428
it forgets to say that IOS users are more likely to be in debt

>>60093004
>The sample size is stupid small
........ 14,000 is not small dumb ass

>>60093966
>Couldn't afford iPhone
>Buys $600 Galaxy

You're right, some people never learn

>>60089428
Anything that compares the income of iPhone and ""Android""" users is pretty disingenuous. Android covers a wide segment of the market, from sub-$100 shitboxes to phones that cost more than ten times as much as the most expensive iPhone. iPhones, on the other hand, are only mid-to-high end phones, and they're fairly popular, so they take up a lot of the mid-to-high end market. Anyone with half a brain would know that comparing iPhone users to Android users means comparing a slice of the mid-to-high end market with the rest of the market with that mid-to-high end slice removed, so of course you're going to see the average income get skewed. It would be different if they compared iPhone users to users of another vendor's equivalently-priced flagships. Also, I bet using an iPhone isn't as strong of a predictor of working in tech and engineering as using, say, a Nexus or Pixel.

You see infographics like this from tech journalists all the time. They know what they're doing. They're Apple fanboys acting as unpaid shills for Apple.

File: Smug Eboshi.jpg (161KB, 700x394px) Image search: [Google]

161KB, 700x394px

>>60089428
Android users are either fools who don't know how to jailbreak their damn phone, poorfags (depends on what phone they have) or idiots who can't tell the difference between iOS and Android.

iPhone users are richfags or stylish people who want a fancier phone but they either don't need a jailbreak or they actually know how to do it.

If they're not richfags or /fa/ggots, then they're JRPG-playing weebs who want to play their JRPGs on the go but don't want to look awkward outside when playing their games on the go which will most likely happen when they're playing on their PS Vita, 3DS, etc...

Also, iOS has iTunes, Apple Music, the only official English translation of Shin Megami Tensei I and the mobile port of Lunar: Silver Star Story which has dual audio, all of which aren't on Android.

Checkmate, baby.

>50% more likely to be redheads;
Long live google!

>>60093052
>namefag

>>60095186
No, statistics are truth, guilt by association is fact, /pol/ was right!

>>60095279
>who don't know how to jailbreak their damn phone
This is just retarded logic. Why the fuck would I choose the option where I have to do an extra step just to do what is essentially the same thing?

>>60089571
>iPhone is an expensive normie phone, while Android user base includes nerds and covers budget-phone consumers.
You have forgotten about jailbreak community

>>60089428
>iOS users most often work in tech or engineering fields
I call bullshit

>>60089428
>Android users are 50% more likely to be redheads
I didn't know India has a lot redheads

>>60089455
>complaining about sample size
The usual go to for someone who's upset about something, but in this case a little bit silly, also the kadam-bhalerao eauation exists

>>60095279
Stop impersonating me

>>60095089
In respect to your population? Yes, it is quite small.

>>60095725
Are you seriously arguing that 14000 people isn't enough to do a few t-tests? Go back to school

>>60095751
You cannot trick everyone else now.
I have a tripcode now.

>>60095300
Just ignore the third world monkey.

>>60095900
Can you please stop impersonating me?

>>60095995
How the hell did you penetrate my tripcode?

I drive a Tesla, fuck models left and right and still use a Galaxy S8.

Samsung Pay is convenient.

>>60096003
The same way I penetrated your mum m8, with lots of force and no cuddling afterwards

>Phones from one producer vs an OS used by several producers who create phones at different price-points
rly mks ur nerons fizzle and tink

i just drop the stallman bomb and i am safe

>>60089428
DUDE CORRELATION LMAO
Wtf I love apple now

>>60089428
iPhone users are decadent druggie trust fund kids

Android is truly the smartphone of the working class

>>60095160
Yeah I don't get it, the iphone 7 starts at £599 and the s7 starts at £529.
Why do you have to pump half a grand into your fucking phone when you eat beans for breakfast lunch and dinner. All on 24 month contracts no less.

Gonna be a joke now with the supposedly much more expensive iphone and the s8 price hike.

>>60093052
look at this animefag's post
lmao

Good comparison here's one of my own:

Ferrari owners:
>100% more likely to be rich
>100% more likely to be handsome
>100% more likely to steal yo girl

Four door sedan owners:
>Ugly
>Stupid
>Probably old
>Your mom

>>60089518
holy shit

File: 1492305794429.png (1MB, 1186x751px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1186x751px

>>60094538

>>60098224
look at this regular fag's post
lmao

we all know that this is bullshit and everyone has a phone they paid 30 dollars down and 30 a month on their bill for two years regardless of model

File: IMG_0005.jpg (218KB, 1280x1707px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 1280x1707px

>>60089518
This was the wake up call I've been looking for.........Holy shit. I will now be leaving this God forsaken website forever, selling all of my neckbeard toys including my pajeet Android phone and my "battle station" and my ridiculous Thinkpad. And then I'm going to buy a MacBook, iPhone, and an apple watch and start dressing appropriately for my chosen career. I will never come back to this shit hole and I will start being normal instead of being a fucking neckbeard pretending I'm better than all those "normies" just because I don't use Apple products and spend all my time indoors being antisocial and playing retarded useless video gaymes that only cause me to gain weight and become even more socially awkward and fucked in the head. I'm going to start a diet and start running and lifting again, find another girlfriend who doesn't play Vidya or consider herself a "nerd" or any other type of degenerate who spends their entire life on the fucking internet.

I should have been focusing on being a normal person all this time....And part of being normal is using simple yet premium electronics which are geared towards fitness and spending as little time as possible getting shit done instead of building a fucking PeeCee and being g a member of the "masterrace" of fat lonely virgins who aren't going anywhere in life.

FUCK I've wasted so much time here arguing with people about fucking shitty technology and coming to contact with pedos and basement dwelling g faggots who think they're better than the "normies"


Well I'm gonna go be a normies and get my life back on track


Goodbye virgins, and good luck clawing your way out if this shit hole of a "life"


>Pic related this is one perk of social interaction

>>60100657
see you next tuesday

>>60100657

godspeed faggot

>>60100657
>Macfags attempting to make pastas to persuade anons to switch to shitty Applel garbage products

We lad. Someone screencap this shit and add it to the circulation of anti macfaggot pics

>>60089428
>IOS
>work in tech
>14,000

Huh?

>>60100657
M-mom?

Well, it's a cheesy internet infograph with no sources, so probably 100% true.

What if i have both?

>>60091651
there are 300 million people in the US tho anon

>>60089428
What about blackberry?

File: Screenshot_2017-04-27-18-31-58.png (332KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1080x1920px

>>60100657
Hmmmmmmm.....

Considering 99% of the android userbase are poo in loos this seems legit to me

>>60089428
Prove to me that all this study by a dating site doesn't conclude is that iOS users are more likely to lie online like a narcissist than Android users?

>>60091651
>>60092410
>>60095678

Dumb. 14k would be more than enough of a reflective sample size of 300million IFF were assuming a random distribution, which there is no reason to believe the people who signed up for that one dating site is a good random selection, especially a non-mainstream dating site.

>>60089518
PREACH
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xl0b2LGf9jM

>>60103410
>He thinks the pic was actually taken by anon


Relax son, he was using it as an example of what you could possibly fuck if you focused on being normal instead of the NEET Hikikomori lifestyle.

Also, anon said he was going to change his life, not that he had already changed. We can only assume that anon is, for the time being, still a NEET but has begun his acsension into normieness

>>60103837
WOW SO MANY WHITE SERVANTS


Wtf did I just watch

>>60090399
Good valid point. Comparing say owners of Apple phones with Samsung flagship/S-series phones would be a lot more fair.

Debt slaves who are willing to throw away $1000+ on a phone are different than people who buy $150 phones.

>>60093015
I know this isn't always the case - but I am personally free of debt. I don't have any and I own my home. I use Android. There's no way I'm flushing hard-earned money away on Apple garbage. I've never met an iPhone user who could say the same - BUT there is something else iPhone users generally can say and that is Look at my fancy brand new car. And said care is usually pretty fancy. And it's usually bought with a very small amount of cash down and lots of debt.

>>60093004
I guess this study of 14k AYI users does say something about AYI users.

>>60089428
I dunno, probably fairly accurate. Although I work in the construction industry, make 6 figures or close to most years (the hours I work can vary quite a bit from week to week, and I dont get paid a salary) and I drink quite a bit. I dont do hard drugs anymore, but still smoke weed regularly. I use an android phone.

Something tells me the results from this survey or wherever they got their information from, are skewed though, or at least subject to some sort of bias. I'd like to know the exact sources before I make up my mind on whether or not its a solid representation

>>60104025
Also adding on, what someone puts in their online dating profile really doesn't mean fuckall. People lie on those all the time

>>60091882
>more expensive
>Pixel and S8 costs exact same as iPhone

Your point is no longer valid, shill.

>>60103490
There's no reason to believe that this sample isn't representative of the greater population, particularly with respect to the proportions estimated, and more particularly with respect to the difference in proportions of individuals estimated here between iPhone and Android users, yes it's convenience sampling, but with 14000 individuals you kinda have a big enough sample, in fact, you likely have the opposite problem

That's not too say that there aren't problems with the infographic, anon has already pointed out the glaringly obvious ones

>>60100657
I wouldn't eating some of her mcnuggies if you know what I mean.

>>60104159
>There's no reason to believe that this sample isn't representative of the greater population
Right off the bat you're wrong, people who sign up for non-mainstream dating sites are usually degenerates or just complete whackjobs.

>>60104046
>Pixel and S8 are the only android phones available

>>60104159
ok, but how were those 14000 people selected? Was it based on logins at a certain time? If so there would be geographical bias. Were the numbers collected at a certain time of year? People in construction/trades (ie the android users in this picture) are much busier in the summer months are less likely to be online dating than the winter when things slow down.

Just because it has 14000 people doesn't mean those 14000 are indicative of society as a whole. Also ya, as the anon above me said, taking data from people who use online dating creates even more bias

>>60091651
Seriously, 1000 would be a decent sample size and probably accurate to 4%. 14000 is a massive sample size for a poll, probably accurate within 1%.

>>60104187
Theere's no reason to believe that the people who sign up for dating sites don't represent the greater population *where the observed differences are concerned*
There is a reason for the differences seen here, anon already pointed out that iPhone users all bought a pretty nice high end phone, but Android users bought a range of devices from high to low end, also girls use iPhones more than Android phones. These two pretty much predict everything there except for the red head thing, that one is a bit out of left field.

>>60104280
>how were they selected?
Convenience sampling, pretty clear they just compared android and iPhone users across the whole cohort of the users of their mobile app in the USA who ticked whatever box in their sign up that allowed them to collect basic information about them.
>they aren't indicative of society as a whole
But they clearly are, maybe not the red head thing, but iPhone users do on average have more disposable income than Android users because there is a more expensive entry requirement for that group, furthermore, Android users are more often male, anon has already pointed these things out but I think you might have missed that, these two things pretty much line up with their conclusions about Android and iPhone users
It's a bit silly to pretend that these observed differences are because of their choice of phone, but that doesn't stop them from existing

>>60100657
hot milf desu.

File: lolwut.jpg (10KB, 222x336px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 222x336px

>>60089428
Who writes this made up garbage?

>>60100657
>and coming to contact with pedos and basement dwelling g faggots who think they're better than the "normies"
so true tho. /g/ and /tv/ are full of unironical paedos.

>>60095089
Retard spotted

>>60105018
There's literally a formula for this, you should look it up

>>60105061
You should look up on what "small data" is

>>60103961
The future my friend.

Get ready to clean the loo for rupees :^)

>>60105149
Meaningless distinction in light of the question "is 14000 individuals enough to estimate several proportions?"