Qutebrowser, the last good web browser

>literally cannot be controlled with mouse, outside of clicking on link or scrolling
>no menu bar, navigation bar, bookmark bar, any of the standard browser features

into the fucking trash it goes

>>60085747
>without even making it public (they didn't announce it);
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/52.0/releasenotes/

The engine is garbage m8 and this >>60085807
Here's you bump tho

>>60085747
I used to like it but its overly complex and eats a whole lot of battery imo so kinda not worth it vs e.g. chromium

qtwebengine = shit
wait for updated qtwebkit

>>60089941
whats wrong with qtwebengine?

>>60090016
outdated chromium

>>60089941
>webkit
It's shit.

>>60085747
>has a unique fingerprint
into the trash it goes

>>60090864
Considering spoof

>>60085747
Okay OP, after all that sugar I am in.

the kickstarter just got fully funded with three full weeks left
I wonder what our lazy-eyed lord will do with all the extra dosh

>>60089941
qtwebkit is deprecated and undeveloped, what are you talking about

File: SHIGGY-PEPE.png (26KB, 190x194px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 190x194px

>>60085747
>implying this nth attempt at Vimprobable, Vimb, Uzbl, dwb, etc. etc. etc. won't just fizzle out into abandonware within a few months again

>>60092511
seriously

* uzbl
* surf
* jumanji
* luakit
* dwb

>>60092393
https://github.com/annulen/webkit

>>60092511
>actively developed for three years now
>"It'll totally fizzle out soon"

>>60092628
the commits page won't load for me.

>>60092511
What killed dwb (and I think others) is that the transition from WebKit1 to WebKit2 essentially meant a rewrite, and the devs didn't have the time for that. qutebrowser was in a similar situation with QtWebKit/QtWebEngine a year ago, but thanks to the first crowdfunding, I was able to work on that full time for two months, which made it possible to do that transition without taking years.

vimb and uzbl are currently somewhat actively developed again and working on a WebKit2 port:
https://github.com/fanglingsu/vimb/commits/webkit2
https://github.com/uzbl/uzbl/commits/next

But yeah - going for 3.5 years now with no intentions of stopping.

>>60092582
jumanji, luakit and dwb are dead since years. surf lacks too much functionality IMHO. uzbl seems to rise from the ashes after months (years?) of inactivity now.

>>60092703
>>60092725
thanks for saving my wrists and battery.

>>60092703
Any intention of porting Qutebrowser to C+=?

>>60092746
>>60078280
I was curious and looked in the archives for other threads

is there a nice place to share user scripts ? i would really like to see your user scripts and to share mine.

>>60092839
pastebin.

>>60092839
For things which are usable for other people too, there's misc/userscripts in the repo:

https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/tree/master/misc/userscripts

For real though bro, the only annoying thing left for me with this browser is the lack of tab completion in the download dialog. Ctrl-W to delete words(a bash thing afaik) would be very nice too.

>>60092905
much cleaner code than mine, i think i will use these userscripts as templates from now on

>>60092917
See https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/2104

ctrl-w already deletes words, except in input fields on pages if you mean that:
https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/68

You can add a binding to do something similar though:

:bind --mode=insert <ctrl-w> fake-key <ctrl-shift-left> ;; fake-key <delete>

>>60093011
I guess I was remembering the functionality wrong, I thought I was asking to be able to delete single words in filepaths. That would probably conflict with the actual usage.
And yeah, I'll just let you keep on trucking with that laundry list you gave yourself.