>people think this is impressive >implying the letters

It's more impressive than making shitty threads like this one.

>>60083453
joke's on you. this thread was shitposted by my machine learning shitposting bot.

>>60083364
Machine learning bots are smarter than half the mongoloids posting here.

File: 1492579974249.jpg (144KB, 572x303px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 572x303px

>>60083517

File: 1491668717217.png (45KB, 350x350px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 350x350px

>>60083517

>>60083364
>>implying the letters are relevant at all
They aren't, you god damn idiot. Nobody is implying that. The point was to use random shapes, in this case they just so happen to be 150 instances of the glyphs found in the Latin alphabet, to draw a god damn image. The letters themselves are not what's relevant. The poster is only claiming it's a small Sunday project anyways. Stop getting mad because your facebook friend is leagues ahead of you and is thus getting more attention for it, you dumb fucking failure.

>>60083364
5-7 years in my opinion. Then people will realize that machine learning / big data / data science were just overhyped memes and consultants will promote something new

>>60083364
>150 letters
Why the fuck would ou need 150 letters for a task which could be done with less than 50?

>>60083865
Do you have downs?

File: DUDE KLEIN BOTTLES.jpg (7KB, 200x150px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 200x150px

>>60083517

>>60083865
Why use 50 letters and a computer when you can just use a Pajeet and a sheet of paper?

>facebook memes

>>60083364

You're telling me that instead of lines it used letters.

Impressive.

>>60083364
How did it learn it? What was the discriminator?

>>60084782
D=b^2 - 4ac probably