This is valid C# code.

What's the problem? Looks like almost any block scoped language.

>>60083186
Also valid Java code

>>60083186
This is literally valid code in any language

File: 1472487001942.jpg (100KB, 711x681px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 711x681px

>>60083186
c# is not going to prevent you from writing retard code.

This is valid in any language

do {
} while (true);

What the fuck /g/? How can programs be allowed to seppuku like this?

this is also valid:

x = 1;

cout << 1/--x;

wtf C is garbage.

int main() {
    return main();
}

This is valid C code.

>>60083186
this almost comes off as an endorsement for the language if you can be so blindly retarded and write valid code
it's part of Microsoft's new autistic programmer outreach program

>>60085517
because placing the -- before the variable does your operation before decrementing, you fucking nigger

>>60085549
actually its the opposite, it decrements first then retrieves the value.

>>60085484
>not doing

while(true) {

}

>>60085484
Not valid in python

>>60085565
>not doing

for(;true;)
{
}

>>60085595
>not doing
for(;;);

>>60085719
>not

start:
goto start;

>>60085565
not doing

loop:
    
    goto loop;

>>60085765

(let loop ()
          (loop))

>>60083186
>Warning on every line.
Why even bother?

>>60086117
> lisp
> kys the language

>>60085565
>not knowing the difference between a while loop and a do while loop

It's like you don't know what you are talking about

>>60085517
> wtf C is garbage
you wrote C++ mate

>>60083186

async's pretty neat actually

fn main() {
    loop { }
}

Wtf I thought you faggots said Rust was safe?

>just because you can do bad something in a language means it's bad by default
Do you also need your mommy to hold your hand while you cross the street?

>>60085549
That's the joke.