ITT we discuss home computers and operating systems from the late 70s to the late 90s
Apple, Commodore, Atari, CP/M, IBM, Compaq, NeXT, and even poor Be
Hopefully this doesn't turn into a Win9x circlejerk
>>60037422
>t. mactoddler
>'home computers'
>posts img of & lists ultra-expensive workstation no normal person ever had
Nice going op
https://youtu.be/8OsuuUpDd1g
NEC PC-88 doe
>Not mentioning the greatest of all, AMSTRAD
kys
also https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmlUYW8bBLY
>>60037422
I've wanted a NeXT Cube for time immemorial
QEMU or VirtualBox for emulating MS-DOS and Windows 3.1?
>>60040446
QEMU is used for better performance usually, (which is a non-issue for modern computers running a DOS VM). So I say VirtualBox just for convenience
>>60037524
>>60037422
>another """general"""
stop, don't make retro computers boring too
Thank goodness we don't need 27 floppy disks to install Microsoft Office anymore.
>>60040446
>>60041525
Doesn't VirtualBox use hardware virtualization and thus have generally better performance?