thoughts on Antergos

Perfectly fine. Automatically installs Steam, yaourt, etc.

It's the proper way to use Arch rather than acting like a huge sperg because you know how to makepkg -cis

Where is the main difference to manjaro?

>>60025114
>this

>>60025114
Manjaro is closer to a traditional distro. It uses Arch as a base, but they test packages a bit more and have a few custom applications.

Antergos is really just an installer for Arch with an extra repo for themes and a few extras, but the vast majority of it comes from the Arch repos.

>>60025253
Thank you anon.

>>60025114
It's mostly a tidy installer with some good support on community packages. Manjaro is like Linux Mint, based off Arch but with it's distro specific packages and bugs.

I really fucked up by using gnome. It has so much bloat as well as avahi.

>>60023958
>Arch for pussies?
More like, Arch for people who realize you gain nothing by installing Arch normally.

File: 1492837054299.jpg (52KB, 376x419px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 376x419px

>>60026841
It has some misconfiguration issues with ZFS installs.
Namely:
>Dumps root into the root zfs dataset
>No options for compression or tuning at install
>Does not create a hibernation device
>The boot is still EXT4

But that's all I've got on it. Pretty much my goto these days.