And the best mobile camera is...

>>60020819
>comparing cameras of TWO phones
>the winner is the winner over all other phones aswell

wtf are you thinking

File: Comb22042017035517.jpg (1MB, 1280x4320px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x4320px

Sony never had good phone cameras.

But if you're gonna blow that much money on a phone why not get a V20 and get non-dogshit phone camera quality?

I still think it's fucking stupid spending that much money for a shitty phone camera. Even an entry level $400 DSLR destroys all phone cameras even the one on the V20.

>>60020990
>Even an entry level $400 DSLR destroys all phone cameras even the one on the V20.

Ok? thats totally irrelevant here.... we are talking about casual phone cameras.

Also, you might want t check yourself but comparisons have been made between entry level DSLR's and cell phone cameras and the cell phone camera was actually of higher quality for the casual user/point and shoot user.

>>60021063
>Also, you might want t check yourself but comparisons have been made between entry level DSLR's and cell phone cameras and the cell phone camera was actually of higher quality for the casual user/point and shoot user.
So for the average joe that doesn't know what half stop or aperture means? okay

My point still stands, DSLRs are simply superior especially because of the fuckhuge image sensor size.

By using a tripod?

Old news brah

S7
S8
V20
P10 Plus

Pick one Anon ^-^

>>60021117
>So for the average joe that doesn't know what half stop or aperture means? okay

Thats right, thats why the simplistic iPhone camera and its ease of use is preferable to the average person. Apple set it to the best possible setting for the average person. These cell phone cameras are purpose built just DSRLs are purpose built for professional and amateur photographers.

Yes, DSRL's in general are superior in the hands of an experienced person.

>>60021438
The same applies for the V20 though. And you get better low-light performance and overall detail like in the pic in my post above.

Why go with dogshit-quality pictures iPhone cameras capture.

I used to own an iPhone 6 plus before it got touch disease btw. Photos looked absolutely abhorrent unless you took them outside between 11:00-13:00 on a sunny day with no clouds.

>>60020819
As far as i know, Apple actually use Sony sensors for their cameras... they probably just have better software.

>>60021553

No one cares or knows about the V20.

As long as the iPhone takes better pictures than most of the competition no one will care.

Hell, I think some iPhones even have optical zoom now.

>>60021575
Hmmm, that explains the dogshit-quality camera compared to LG phone cameras.

>>60021575
Apple has an entire team dedicated to making the iPhone cameras perfect. since their hardware and software are both in house they can get some pretty impressive results.

>>60021586
>No one cares or knows about the V20.
They do, people love the high quality photos it takes.

>As long as the iPhone takes better pictures than most of the competition no one will care.
see >>60020990

>>60021605
>They do, people love the high quality photos it takes.

I hear you man, there exist a phone that takes a better picture.

The iPhone is far, far more ubiquitous and has much higher volume sales than the V20 and thus the V20 is no competition. Apples and oranges really.

But I do agree that if you want a superior camera than by all means, buy the V20 and be happy.

>actually buying bootlooping LGshit

File: IMG_0326.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>10$ point and shoot camera from 2004

>>60021716
You sure love beating that dead horse, huh?

File: IMGP9337.jpg (1017KB, 4928x3264px) Image search: [Google]

1017KB, 4928x3264px

DSLR

>>60020990
Most people cheat on these to prove a point. If you make the iPhone white balance on a bright part of the image, the darker parts look like shit.

>>60021853
>LITERALLY an lg cuckold

>>60021948
True but this was a fair comparison. Settings were left at default settings.

>>60021605
>little bitch 1/2" phone sensors
>high quality photos
maybe if you're an instashit turbonormie

>>60021988
>What is Pentax

>>60022011
Sorry we aren't all Autismus Decimus Maximus like yourself.

File: derKopf.png (162KB, 282x274px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 282x274px

>>60021990
Nice nick.
I just wanna let you know, I did not read your comment

File: considersuicide.png (105KB, 228x216px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 228x216px

>>60022034
sorry i don't spend $800 to take dog filter selfies when a $300 cellphone would have served the same purpose

What about the Pixel?

File: 2013-12-10 09.42.27.jpg (782KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

782KB, 1600x1200px

>>60022034
>I don't have passion for photography and artistic usage of my camera

>>60022061
>laughinggirl_dslrversion.jpg

>>60021602
>their hardware and software are both in house
>Sony hardware sensor

File: NK_Supermarket.jpg (59KB, 600x382px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 600x382px

>>60022223
At least they are
>both in the house now

>>60021666
Lol, you brought this camera comparison thing.
Fact is that iphone doesn't have best phone camera.

>How can anyone else even compete
Haha, what a brainwashed apple scum.

>>60022011
Well as far as phone cameras are concerned. I was able to play with a nikon DSLR camera a family member of mine uses for freelance photography and I have to say no phone camera comes close to the RAW image quality those things produce.

>>60022334
But Iphones are used for movies
Your Samsung Galaxy Ace can't do that.