CPU-Z thread famalams

>CPUID
>Not speccy


Why?

File: my_newest_cpu-z.jpg (68KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 403x402px

>>60015696
>Why not speccy

Because, why not? And because Speccy hasn't been updated in six months and doesn't know 7700k, doesn't know G.Skill DDR4 3400 ram, and doesn't know GTX 1080 VRAM.

>>60015681
>>60015848
>botnet 10

File: cpuz r5.png (36KB, 405x405px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 405x405px

>>60015681

>wangblows
>>>/v/

>>60015681
4.5 ghz at 1.072V? How is this possible?

>>60016158
It's not. Don't be a retard.

>>60016158
silicon lottery

>>60015681
How do I OC my 2600k? I set the mulitplier to 45 but the chip downclocks to 3.9 whenever I put load on all four cores.

>>60015681
>4.5Ghz at 1.07vcore

You can't do that on the best of server binned variants with HT off stop lying to me.

>>60016305
my chip is golden and blessed by the gods, what can I say

>>60016186
>>60016216
Please fight it out.

>>60016342
show it under load, like p95.

>>60016462
no

File: 12a2e8c727f74bd83cc563e7f4089bad82d087ed.png (35KB, 399x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 399x400px

My CPU

File: Screenshot_6.png (31KB, 410x417px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 410x417px

This was a very hard screenshot to get.

>>60016573
>1199.29 MHz
Kek. How's it like being a megahertzlet?

>>60016629
Good joke its as obvious as dog shit its idle you kike

>>60016628
wew lad, is that a Netburst housefire?

File: 2017-02-17 20_59_31-CPU-Z.png (37KB, 801x395px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 801x395px

>>60016643
the max multiplier you have set is x36, so at most it would clock up to 3.6GHz since you have a 100Mhz bclk.

File: muhryzen.png (56KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 806x402px

No ragrets

>>60015681
>housefire bridge
wew lad

File: 1482892586922.png (387KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 500x500px

>>60016799
>No ragrets
a man full of regret says for the 6th time this month

>>60016794
You do realize i have my 6800k at stock right? have a day.

File: Clipboard01.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>60015681

>>60015848
>housefire lake
do you have water cooling for that?

>>60016573
>he bought broadwell-e
AHASHASHAHAHAHJA

File: CinebenchR15.png (14KB, 497x231px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 497x231px

>>60016818
No fucking shit, and it's embarrassing.

The 6800k is one of intel's highest OC'ing parts.


Stock is 3.4GHz with a 3.6GHz turbo and it OC's to 4.2GHz+ on all 6 cores easily.

Why anyone would run it under 4GHz is beyond me, they're either retarded, or man children who don't understand how to use the CPU they purchased.

File: MyCpuz4.5.jpg (81KB, 413x399px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 413x399px

>>60015681
http://valid.canardpc.com/2625016
idle voltage twins.

>>60016812
It might have been overkill but I need a new CPU. 4 of the threads weren't even used when I was streaming

>>60016846
>man children who don't understand how to use the CPU they purchased.

he bought broadwell-e, isnt that obvious that he has no fucking idea what hes doing

>>60016846
It's embarassing for you but i'll overclock it when i see need to. at this moment in time it meets my requirements for what i do. so cry some moar tittybaby.

File: cpuz.png (28KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 403x402px

>Windows 10
>Ryzen

>>60016862
>when I was streaming
oh boy...

You shouldnt be doing CPU encoding while streaming anyway, so CPU cores shouldnt mean shit.

Streaming should be done with a hardware encoding method either the integreated GPU using Quicksync if you have intel, or dedicated GPU through NEVNC with Nvidia, or AMD's VCE if you have an AMD GPU.

This offloads 100% of the encoding from your CPU, and has the hardware encode block of your GPU do the encoding for you, this decreases the quality (but for streaming your limitation is bandwidth anyway, so not a concern).


Tldr; there is no reason your CPU cores should be stressed at all for streaming, besides for the game you're playing, the stream itself shouldnt need CPU cores.

>>60015967
Bad silicon lottery bro

>>60016897
yeah it's pretty obvious, all I can say is at least he didn't get the 6850k.
>>60016903
It's embarrassing for you because anyone who knows about hardware can just from a glance see you're a moron.

>>60016938
Haters gonna hate, stay mad.

>>60016912
GPU Encoding looks like shit compared to CPU encoding at the same bitrate. Trust me I been doing this for a while. I do use high bitrate to record with GPU encoder doe.

File: pic 5.png (28KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 403x402px

>>60016950
>GPU Encoding looks like shit compared to CPU encoding at the same bitrate

100% true I learned that the hard way.

File: cpuz.png (26KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 403x402px

>>60015681

File: 1492856236475.png (495KB, 1070x601px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1070x601px

>>60016982
>>60016911
>>60016799
>>60015967
>all these ryzens
DEEEELET

>>60016950
>>60016982
It is 100% true, and should not be used for movies or anime, or other media that isn't being streamed.

However, for streaming needs, you're retarded if you think it's worth the CPU hit to do software encoding.

It's still gonna look like trash because Twitch considers it abusing their network if you upload above 6,000kbps.

So you're either doing GPU encoding and not using ANY CPU time. Or you're doing super fast preset software encoding on your CPU, it still looks fairly trash, AND using up a LOT more CPU power.

File: lower numbers.jpg (45KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 403x402px

>>60016999
is anyone else using the new cpu z?

>>60016982
On Twitch it's best to use low bitrate as possible so everyone can watch you, but YT encodes your shit regardless I think.

>>60017012
>housefirelake
you need to leave this board and go back

>>>/v/

>>60016748
nah, pentium M's are still based on pentium 3's P6 architecture

i have a G40 with a 2.8ghz Northwood Pentium 4 in it though, which is ironically not much of a housefire, while dicking around with /tpg/ we determined that the beefy cooler on the fucker actually keeps it below 65c under max load, and thats a nearly 70w processor, while this itty bitty 25w pentium M can hit 80c+

>>60017021
DELET

>>60017038
>nah, pentium M's are still based on pentium 3's P6 architecture
>P6
and so is babby lake, your point?

File: 2017-04-22 11_20_33-CPU-Z.png (14KB, 401x398px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 401x398px

>>60017021

http://www.cpuid.com/softwares/cpu-z.html

Update to 1.79 famalams

>>60017020
Trust me 4k bitrate 720p60fps is mint on CPU encoding. My friend streams fine with that on his i5 so I don't see why I should not use CPU encoding with 16 threads.

File: Screenshot_7.png (14KB, 502x163px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 502x163px

>>60017054
>and so is babby lake, your point?
What does that have to do with anything?
Kaby Lake isnt P6 lmao

>>60017089
>kaby lake isnt p6
good goyim

>>60017068
>he overclocked just to win over a stock 1700

>>60017020
The point is not achieving a certain bitrate but a certain quality at a certain bitrate.

And yes, CPU encoding does look better at the same bitrate than GPU encoding.

No respectable streamer uses GPU offloaded encoding. Some people even go so far as to buy a second PC only for streaming so all the CPU can do is encoding.

>>60017076
>4k bitrate 720p60fps is mint on CPU encoding. My friend streams fine with that on his i5
What games? Minecraft?


Seriously though, if you think anyone watching a stream of that could tell the difference between CPU and GPU encoding, you're out of your mind.

If you're encoding and recording to be used later for youtube or other distribution, sure makes a bit more sense to do some CPU encoding because the quality IS going to be better, and if you're editing and doing shit to it in post, then having a higher quality file will be better. However, 90% of streamers aren't doing this. They just need to get a decent looking stream and be able to play their game at the same time.
GPU encoding is the quickest, easiest, and usually best way to do this.

The only people I really recommend use CPU encoding are the streamers pulling in $10k+ a month and have a dedicated encode/stream PC that records their gaming PC.

>>60017115
over clocked? I've been overclocked the whole time senpai.
>>60016846
>>60016794
I run at 4.3GHz 24/7.

I have had mine stable up to 4.7GHz

>>60017089
>core microarchitecture which is in turn also derived from the p6 microarchitecture
are you fucking stupid? can you not read?

Ignore the retarded uneducated Rypoo fags

Kaby Lake is not P6, P6 could never run 64bit code, could not run AVX2 code etc

>>60017127
Why haven't you overclocked?

>>60017131
Anon what are you doing

>>60017120
I just said it doesn't hinder performance, and when I record I use GPU with 15k bitrate 1080p60fps since I can use any bitrate I want. But for streaming it makes a lot of difference since you are better off with lower bitrates.

>>60017139
>P6 could never run 64bit code
>core 2 duo wasn't 64 bit
>Nahelem wasn't 64 bit
>Sandy Bridge wasn't 64 bit
>Ivy Bridge wasn't 64 bit
>Haswell wasn't 64 bit
>Skylake wasn't 64 bit
>Kaby Lake wasn't 64 bit

actual fact denial from one of (((them)))

>>60017152
>stock cooler

waitiing for my evo 212 bracket

>>60017193
All those architectures are not P6, stay mad and retarded though, uneducated Rypoofag

>>60017207
what clock speed?

>>60017184
>I just said it doesn't hinder performance
lol oh well fuck, if you said so. /s


Moron faggot, pay the fuck attention. Just because you play little bitch clicker games and your CPU is fine with that, don't think that's enough CPU power for everyone.

Go ahead and stream GTA5 or witcher 3 at 720p60 with CPU encoding, let me know how it goes.

>>60017220
>720p60 with CPU encoding
not him, but that is nothing.

>>60017237
He said his friend does it with an i5.

Good fucking luck playing GTA with an i5 AND CPU encoding.

File: p6.png (46KB, 886x255px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 886x255px

>>60017208
What's this then

>>60017220
We play competitive FPS games so it doesn't matter, I would just use 720p30fps otherwise. I am GPU limited anyways with 280x and as I said I'm sure I won't be CPU limited. And even if I am I'll just buy a capture card for m FX8350 build and use that to encode.

>>60017208
>>60017262
BTFO

File: 1491774776875.jpg (29KB, 500x562px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x562px

>>60017267
>werks for me™

>>60017303
Succ yourself, CPU encoding is the way to stream.

File: hitler-getty.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>60017208
>>60017262
*franticly trying to disprove facts*
back to the gas chambers intelcuck

File: 1492388941632.jpg (59KB, 400x409px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 400x409px

>>60017322
Go SUCC your boyfriend, maybe he'll let you CPU encode on his cock.

>>60017370
My girlfriend is a girl(female).

File: 528.png (353KB, 969x727px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 969x727px

>>60017295

File: chrome_2017-04-22_11-50-47.png (30KB, 401x401px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 401x401px

I'm having a great time with this CPU

>>60017531
>babby lake
cucked

>>60017567
>1 ghz
nice cpu

>>60017619
its idling dumbass

File: cpu2.png (24KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 403x402px

ryzen fags BTFO

>>60017012
>only 100.00 Mhz Bus Speed in thread

aw yis

>>60017602
Awesome post!!! you sure showed me haha epic!!! :))

>>60017801
But there are people in here with your CPU and higher clocks.

Who cares about 100.00mhz with a 45 multiplier if someone else has 99.96mhz and a 48 multiplier?

>>60017038
noice, few years ago I acquired a used prebuilt from a school with some dual core P4 in it, repasted the CPU and added a spare 212evo that I had laying around and it was still a housefire (idled at 65c). I had Linux running on it for a while until the PSU exploded and took everything with it, RIP

>>60017825
i didnt post the picture

stay mad that 100.00 Mhz is better than 99.98, 99.80 and so on

>>60017847
>stay mad that 100.00 Mhz is better than 99.98, 99.80 and so on
see
>>60017531
>106.71Mhz
guess it's the best of them all

>>60017868
>guess it's the best of them all
It's really the only way to overclock this CPU which is weird.

>>60017666
thats not how it works tard

>>60017811
>>>/reddit/

>>60017978
You are one dumb motherfucker if you think i was being serious in that response to a post that was equally fucking stupid.

>>60017958
That's exactly how it works, just look at the box that says "multiplier"
it says (12-41) meaning it can apply anything from 12 to 41 and anything in between.
It is currently 12 * the bus speed of 99.98Mhz
So 12*99.98 is 1199.72Mhz
But at the high end we have 41 so 41*99.98Mhz is 4099.17MHz, or 4.1GHz.

>>60018010
back to /reddit/ intelfag

>>60018048
What are you even talking about senpai?

>>60018082
back to /reddit/ intelcuck

File: hellya2.jpg (167KB, 1181x627px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1181x627px

>>60015681

File: 1341292229313.jpg (332KB, 1280x881px) Image search: [Google]

332KB, 1280x881px

>>60018097
>uses cuck unironically
>tells people to go back to redshit like a retard when he gets called out
kek

>>60018213
back to /reddit/ intelshill

>>60017868
lol m8 u dont understodd the more its closer to the 100.00 mhz the more stable its is
100.00 mhz is esier to calculator than all those odd numbers u dum

>>60018122
>broken sensor
kek

>>60018122
>off by 0.45mhz

damn.

>>60018122
H O T
O
T

File: 212.jpg (63KB, 408x410px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 408x410px

9 months of no regrets so far

>>60018289
>payed $600 for something he could have had for $250
embarrassing

>>60018324
>paid ~$400
>factory sealed
>using it long before Ryzen
>Great clocker that still outperforms Ryzen
I'll say it again, no regrets

>>60018226
it is 1998 fuck head. My motherboard has a specific chip that can set 100, 125, 150, 175, and 200mhz bclk. Stable as fuck if you know what you're doing.

>>60018567
*isn't

>>60018567
no

File: fcec45ad01bd373058b8a2abc29d78c2.png (31KB, 390x398px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 390x398px

>>60015681
I stand by my skylake purchase. Was the right choice considering I was stuck using a shitty FX 8320 which couldn't OC worth shit before.

File: Untitled.png (29KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 403x402px

lol

>>60016748
Pentium M was the predecessor to the Core processor and Core 2, it was a lot better than P4 per clock cycle and ran a lot cooler.

File: cpuz.png (27KB, 404x404px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 404x404px

>>60015681

When you guys to going to join the older Xeon master race?

>>60016004
Nice overclock! That's 2ghz over the stock speed.

File: 1489540149139nn.jpg (62KB, 456x628px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 456x628px

>>60018996
>160W TDP
Fucking Christ I found out why India's power grid keeps going down

File: House Fire..jpg (561KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1000x667px

>>60018122

File: Screenshot_1.jpg (70KB, 404x404px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 404x404px

>>60015681

>>60016573
>Intel
>6-core
>140w TDP

>>60019510
To be fair though, at stock clocks you would struggle to use 140w.

Even OC'd to 4GHz I can barely get mine to hit over 160w.

>>60017020
>it's worth the CPU hit
Seems like someone doesn't have 8 cores to spare

File: Jewed no more.png (17KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 403x402px

>>60017068
>>60017115

File: cpuz.png (317KB, 1800x604px) Image search: [Google]

317KB, 1800x604px

>all dem ryzen owners

my niggas, what cpus did upgrade from? i5 4670 here

>>60019609
>using the old version.

Wow fantastic comparison


moron.

File: gyfv.png (26KB, 476x460px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 476x460px

you are just a child. watch this

>>60015681
4.5GHz at 1.072V
Holy shit

File: 2525252525.jpg (143KB, 885x492px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 885x492px

Ramlets leave

>>60019463
>when you see it

>>60019870
>win10

>>60019463
Holly fuck 3.6 on less then 1 volt
lucky bastard

>>60019463
lulz "Trap, Surprise Penis inside.

>>60018122
Temperature readings on 700 and 900 series AMD chipset mobos are fucked. 800 series are fine somehow.

File: Untitled.png (31KB, 406x433px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 406x433px

>>60019799
My DDR3 1600 can't compete.

File: 2.jpg (67KB, 611x606px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 611x606px

>>60016794
Seems theres something wrong with my 5820K - Could it be all the programs running in the background? I'm too lazy to close them.

File: wolfdale.png (63KB, 842x418px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 842x418px

>all these ryzen cucks
chillin' with mah wolfie

File: 1.jpg (87KB, 611x606px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 611x606px

>>60016794
Also I got more multithread performance than yours which make it look even weirder. I remember the 5820K scored around 2000, my old 3770K 1900-ish.

>>60017014
Nice! Will post my II 940 when I go to bed. Unfortunately the 940 doesn't support DDR3, I'll probably switch it to some i5 based machine just because upgrading the 4 GB DDR2 would cost more than the whole rest.

>>60020371
please not you again... my phenom station feels like a highend workstation compared to yours

>tfw bought 6850 c2ds last year for 50 cent per piece and sold them for 7-8 €
>made around 800 €
>took less than 2 days to sell all

File: 1297641257214.png (22KB, 696x552px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 696x552px

>>60019695
>2.464V

File: cpu-z.png (51KB, 806x402px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 806x402px

>>60015681
Any post-SB CPU is a meme.

>>60020564
>any post-SB CPU is a meme
this, if I am being quite honest with you phamalam

>>60020542
there's no escaping me :^)

>tfw i have an OC-capable board but don't know shit about overclocking

>>60019695
>Socket AM4(1331)
>not 1337

>>60020655
Is this thing even OCable?

I saw a whole i5-2500 / 8 GB / Z board being sold for 55 € in a forum lately. This made me really thing of dismissing my Phenom because >>60020446

It had one defective RAM slot but I think three more are enough for 55 €

>>60020684
>Is this thing even OCable?
Yes, it is, through FSB.

>>60020446
>Unfortunately the 940 doesn't support DDR3

Sure it does. All Phenom IIs support both DDR2 and DDR3. You're probably just using it in a shitty old AM2+ motherboard with DDR2 slots.

File: clip+(2017-04-22+at+03.40.39).png (25KB, 406x433px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 406x433px

>>60019799
Damn, you win.

File: cpuz.png (25KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 403x402px

Feels good, fampai

File: Capture.jpg (58KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 403x402px

>>60015681
>>60015848
>>60015967
>>60016004
>>60016115
>>60016573
>>60016628
>>60016794
>>60016799
>>60016856
>>60016911
>>60016982
>>60016996
>>60017012
>>60017014
>>60017127
>>60017180
>>60017265
>>60017295
>>60017451
>>60017531
>>60017567
>>60017758
>>60018289
>>60018600
>>60018829
>>60018996
>>60019070
>>60019204
>>60019463
>>60019795
>>60019799
>>60019842
>>60020371
>>60020380
>>60020564
>>60020666
I'm running with XFR disabled and using the high performance profile because with XFR enabled, my crosshair likes to average 1.4+v's in a 20 minute period just browsing the web, and only a web browser open, into my 1800x. I tried two different crosshairs and three different 1800x's and a 1700x. all where the same.

funny, i did have a gigabyte gaming 5 for a short while and it only averaged 1.32v's. i also found someone else who noticed the same thing. and of course asus won't acknowledge anything and replied back "working as intended."

i should have kept the gigabyte gaming 5. don't buy the crosshair unless you want to overclock or run with XFR disabled.

File: 2017-04-22 15_55_02-MaxxMEM² - PreView.png (22KB, 378x423px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 378x423px

>>60019799
>>60020754
Not super accurate, at least not on my setup.

Doesn't detect my X99 setup properly, and userbench gives me much more realistic results for my setup.

I currently have 3x8GB DDR4 3200MHz in triple channel (it's quad channel but I have a broken DIMM).

I should get between 50-70ns latency and around 40Gb/s read speeds.

Userbench gives me 52.5ns latency
and 45Gb/s read speed.

MaxxMEM^2 gives me 150ns latency and 19Gb/s

>>60021022
Have you tried running as admin?

>>60021041
Yup, and in compatibility mode with W7, though the website says it works fine with W10.

Seems to just not like the X99 platform.

>>60021055
On my setup, I tried running maxxmem again. This time my settings and latency testing isn't detected. I found out afterwards that cpu-z (which this application relies on) does not close when closing maxxmem, for me anyways.
So I end task the cpu-z and rerunning maxxmem works again. Looks like I have to use this workaround.

>>60021125
I see this happening as well, but in either case I get issues.

>>60020831
So set your voltage manually, retard.

File: Untitled.png (23KB, 395x440px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 395x440px

>>60019799

piece of shit took down my system

>>60021407
see
>>60021022
>>60021055

File: 1199262084001.jpg (405KB, 2560x1600px) Image search: [Google]

405KB, 2560x1600px

Hey remember me ? When intel used to make top tier processor worth the price

>>60021422

too late I already restarted and got worse benchmark results out of it

>>60021476

my q6600 is still living in the pc I gave to my brother, more than can be said for my 2500k which had to be retired due to shoddy asus boards

File: Capture.png (25KB, 402x377px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 402x377px

>>60015681
> Xeon 1245 v3
> 32GB ECC RAM
> 250GB SSD
> 2x 1TB HDD (mirror)
> GTX1060
> HDDVD/BDROM/DVDROM combo

Not bad for $225 (cost of GPU)

File: cpuz_2017-04-22_18-33-24.png (30KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 403x402px

Laptop

File: Ram .jpg (109KB, 420x410px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 420x410px

>>60017014
me again, this time with ram shot

>>60020831
Thanks for the notification senpai

File: Capture.png (29KB, 400x399px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 400x399px

>>60015681

File: bgjozw[1].png (94KB, 813x454px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 813x454px

Step aside corelets, hahah!

File: Capture.jpg (60KB, 415x411px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 415x411px

Not a single 2500k bro here, what's wrong with you /g/?

>>60022519
Most of them got a well-deserved upgrade to Ryzen lol

>>60022346
What kind of fucking retard buys a 1700X when they plan to manually overclock?

>>60022631
I bought mine one day so I didnt really know. 1700 is only €40 less here and most likely woundn't make it to this clock. I also want the option to run stock.

File: speccy2.png (73KB, 416x415px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 416x415px

>>60015681

File: intelsuicidewatch.png (246KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 882x758px

>>60016999

>>60020732
The C2 revision Phenom IIs dont support it (920 and 940BE). Anything C3 or later will.

>>60020795
6600K here. I want the 1600 but I need to upgrade my GPU first.

>>60022519

mobo shit the bed and low end used mobos on good chipsets cost more than what I paid new for a mid-range mobo

planned obsolescence is a bitch

>>60016934
seeing as this man >>60020795 looks to be worse off, my chip cant be all that bad.

File: CPU-Z.png (61KB, 814x400px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 814x400px

Oh hai. Q9400 CPU-Z is up next.

File: nodkry[1].png (19KB, 409x408px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 409x408px

>>60022346

File: 2529978.png (112KB, 407x390px) Image search: [Google]

112KB, 407x390px

>>60022782
and here it is. Sadly it wasnt anywhere near stable at this speed

>>60018289
>140 watts
i hope you're watercooling that shit

>>60022775
At least I can reach 3.8 at sane voltages and temps like you, problem is that I got an MSI Mortar board and it might take a few BIOS updates to get better results. Never tried 3.9 anyway, and I'd rather not do it with the stock cooler for the moment.

I've seen other people that just cannot reach 3.8 stable on their chips at all no matter how much voltage they throw at it. Those are the ones that got actually fucked by the lottery, we were just unlucky.

File: hwut.jpg (6KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 200x200px

>>60018289
>Buys i7 5930K for $600
>Ryzen 1700 comes out and destroys it for almost half the price
>No regrets

File: cpuz_WinXP_Pro_x64.png (35KB, 408x400px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 408x400px

Waiting for Zen+

>>60023114
I'm
>>60023183

>tfw 4.3Ghz at 1.3V

File: delete this.jpg (19KB, 600x448px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 600x448px

>>60022574

>>60023191
Don't feel too bad, 4.5 ghz on my chip wasn't even stable at 1.32 volts, Like fuck that shit, no way im going above 1.3 volts.

>>60022519
nobody here using pentium 4 what's wrong with you /g/?

>>60023261
I think I got it to 2.4ghz @ 1.31v but when I walked away my computer restarted, twice. So I turned it down.

File: pic.png (47KB, 416x411px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 416x411px

Hello from 2010

>>60023428
at least it's not the hyper-threaded dual core i5 from that gen

can't wait for the i9

>>60023490
It's all a meme anyway because of Sandy Bridge coming a year later

Who would have known?

>>60023571
no one with a 920, they wont hear it until their mobo dies.

File: cpuz.png (29KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 403x402px

My mobo hates any FSB above 195 and even there it causes file corruption. Hell, even this speed causes file corruption but nowhere near as bad. =[

>>60023932
what board, and what settings?

>>60023952
Asus P6T. First gen. Volts and QPI are 1.3v, otherwise shit just bluescreens and gets worse the higher I go. Did the same thing with the 920 I had in here previously. Just a bad overclocker.

>>60023932
6-core on socket 1366? How much did this cost?

>>60024045
Have you tried adding some voltage to the IOH?

Pity though, decent LGA 1366 boards are rare and expensive, so replacing it is kinda pointless. I'm damn happy I lucked out in getting my own 1366 board for super cheap ($30 NIB) and the fact for an Intel board is OC's pretty good. (221mhz bclock after which the QPI politely reminds me that its running at nearly 8ghz)

>>60024132
x5650s can be had for under $30 on fleabay. A board that can hit 200mhz bclock can see them to 4.2ghz or more.

>>60024178
That's cool. In the UK I couldn't find any 1156 i7/xeon under 60 pounds or so. Not worth at that price, but I would pay 30 dollars for HT of any kind for this motherboard.

Must be an American thing I guess.

High voltage niggaaaaaaaaaa

I wish I has the money for a ryzen build

File: 1486602682346.jpg (16KB, 634x450px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 634x450px

>>60022767
>tfw when 2600K and decent Z77 board
>suddenly spooked that it will die on me soon

File: NewCPUZ.png (28KB, 402x399px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 402x399px

just got done stress testing this build. 1700X is really nice. Flashed the latest BIOS to my board, RAM XMP works fine. Hoping nothing surprises me down the line.

File: Unbenannt2.jpg (57KB, 407x404px) Image search: [Google]

57KB, 407x404px

Phenomfags, arise!

File: Unbenannt3.jpg (44KB, 407x404px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 407x404px

>>60025454
also for interest, this thing can still compete i3s
at least in multithreading... the power draw is insane

>>60025454
>>60025465
I had a Phenom a long way back. Then I got an 8150, which sucked ass. Almost put me off AMD. Got a 6600K and now I want an R5 1600, but I need a new GPU. I'm waiting for Vega so I don't feel jewed out of my money in case it's really good

File: 1486940840891.png (154KB, 505x479px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 505x479px

>>60015681
>Not having AVX2

>>60016004
>4.7ghz

nigga how the fuck?

>>60026616
whats dat

>>60022929
true that. mine hits 70 under aida64 load.

File: cupu-z.jpg (87KB, 417x402px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 417x402px

>>60027005
something not used by most software

>>60027098
Almost any software, and even the software that does use it can generally get very similar, and even better results with AVX

>>60027098
dude anything that runs complicated math or scalar/vector functions usually use AVX

Videogames, Video production, Audio DAWs, compiling code, neural nets, etc.

basically if you do anything important you're going to want SSE4

File: 1492855909643.png (944KB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1228x1502px

>>60015967
>>60016799
>>60016911
>>60016982
>>60017127
>>60017451
>>60019204
>>60019695
>>60020666
>>60020795
>>60020831
>>60022346
>>60024593

STOP BUYING RYZEN

File: shit.png (93KB, 1040x576px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 1040x576px

The actual voltage in BIOS is +.114, which I think means it should be at 1.314v. I don't think I outright lost the silicon lottery, but I didn't really win either. I could probably do 3.9GHz, but I don't want the case to be shitting out tons of heat for 100 or 200 more MHz. My RAM is also stuck at 2667MHz right now. Hopefully Gigabyte delivers in May.

File: 1485481789221.jpg (46KB, 388x445px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 388x445px

>all these ryzens no higher than ~3.7GHz
bad silicon? meme chip? what's going on?

>>60018413
>housefirewell
>better than ryzen
wew lad nice bait

>>60028317
>but muh clockspeeds
ryzen doesn't even need high clocks because its a better arch

>>60025849
Isn't that a four core? Better get six or eight cores and never switch again.

1070s aren't that expensive anymore, also the Phenom IIs were pretty good. FX series was a step back.

>>60027333
What's with this constant falsflagging and brandwars?
You niggers are no better than /v/

>>60019695
>2.46v
Nice timebomb.

>>60032802
It'd already be dead if that voltage was real, you stupid nigger.

>>60015967
corelet

File: cw.png (20KB, 419x416px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 419x416px

pls kill me

File: JUST.png (24KB, 390x442px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 390x442px

>>60033246
kek

File: IMG-20160514-WA0006.jpg (8KB, 252x240px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 252x240px

>>60029507
>if clock speed were much higher it would explode

Nice arch lel

File: Capture.png (27KB, 401x399px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 401x399px

comfy 4690k

File: Untitled.png (24KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 403x402px

>>60034946
Nice stock volt clocks. Mine won't do 4.0.
It will do 3.9 at -0.06V and never blip my 212 EVO above idle.

>>60035007

File: netburst.jpg (156KB, 962x641px) Image search: [Google]

156KB, 962x641px

>>60033752
>>60033752

>>60035007
forgot actual content whoops

mine is devils canyon, where they took the voltage regulator away from the die to improve temps (however, i still hit 72ishC)

File: Screenshot_20170423-114904.png (238KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 1440x2560px

:^)

File: Untitled.png (37KB, 636x793px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 636x793px

>>60035138
What mine look like.

File: Capture.png (42KB, 625x785px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 625x785px

>>60035231

>>60035245
Your peak wattage is barely higher than mine yet your temps spike and your fan cranks. I had mine at 4.2 stock volts and didn't see much above 65.
What HSF are you running?

File: 20170404_165612.jpg (698KB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

698KB, 2016x1512px

>>60035453
nh d15

>>60035138
Devil's Canyon still had the FIVR. It was just a refresh of Haswell with higher clocks. Skylake is when they moved it back to the motherboard.

>>60031292
That's because those who care about brands actually ARE /v/, and should therefore get the fuck off my fucking board.

File: Untitled.png (28KB, 407x403px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 407x403px

>>60015681
I'm considering that there Ryzen

I'm considering Ryzen real hard

>>60035569
You may want to reseat that since it seems you're not making great contact. Though if there's no perceptible fan noise you could just leave it. 72C won't hurt anything and you always risk breaking something when you futz around. (I've learned long ago not to go mucking about in systems that are working just fine.)

>>60036070
it's inaudable at 800RPM, but i've reseated it multiple times with different coolers and i end up with the same temp spiking bullshit. I purely think my chip sucks

>>60036103
You probably have to delid if you want better temps.

>>60036202
it's an airflow problem

case side off gets wayy lower temps

File: Capture.png (39KB, 617x784px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 617x784px

>>60036402
forgot pic

>>60036498
Uh yeah, I'd say so.
Buy a case fan.

>>60036579
two in the front, just not got one at the back

>>60036599
I'd move 'em, since they're not doing you any good up there. If that's how the case came it was a stupid design choice. "Let's try to force air though all these obstructions!" It's just creating high pressure pocket right behind the fans so they're spinning their blades not doing much of anything.
If you have a blowhole I'd turn the Noctuna fans around, pull both fans from the front, and make two intake fans at the rear and blowhole. If you don't have a blowhole I'd take one from the front and again make an intake at the rear. Two intakes are fine -- that case has holes everywhere for it to exhaust.

File: cpuz_2017-04-23_13-54-35.png (75KB, 503x502px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 503x502px

>>60017068
Muh gen advantage

File: cpu-z.png (58KB, 826x419px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 826x419px

>>60035569
you're probably recycling hot air because there is no exhaust.
>>60020831
you prob need to adjust llc and offset voltage
>>60017021
I didn't even know there was a new one.
>>60018122
>os at 60c
ha
>>60020684
you should get that and run 2x dimm in dual channel. You can clock the 2500 a bit on a p-z chipset
>>60023114
me too
>>60037176
i7-7600k(4C/4T)
wat

only gets x41 on 2c. Wish I would've grabbed a z board when they were cheaper

File: cpuz.jpg (141KB, 814x403px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 814x403px

I'm loving my Ryzen so far I'm so glad I waited instead of falling for the i7 7700 meme.

File: 2017-04-23 (3).png (179KB, 603x602px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 603x602px

2.9GHz@18c

File: my_newest_cpu-z_.jpg (374KB, 806x804px) Image search: [Google]

374KB, 806x804px

I loathe Intel but I had a bad experience with AMD. Overclocking this was extraordinarily easy and painless.

File: Clocks.png (39KB, 512x446px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 512x446px

>Tfw its 2002 all over again with front side bus OCing

File: 4690k.png (24KB, 401x401px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 401x401px

shalom, goyims.

File: h1rrws.png (33KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 403x402px

>>60015681

>>60038928
Nice gains tho bro

File: 1489334474611.gif (2MB, 202x360px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 202x360px

>>60016912
>>60017020
>>60017120
>>60017220
>>60017370
This is absolutely dogshit advice, not that that hasn't been pointed out enough in this thread already. GPU encoding at 2000-4000 kbps looks like absolute butthole and that's the sweetspot bitrate if you want people to be able to watch your stream. You need a good CPU to pull 720p/60fps medium or slower x264 encoding, if not a dedicated streaming PC. GPU encoding at that bitrate is horseshit.

>>60039193
unlucky huh

File: Daily.png (226KB, 410x393px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 410x393px

>>60026697
Check dem voltages

>>60039193
Is that stable at those voltages?

>>60039214
>>60039233

>>60039233
>>60039214

Yes it is stable. I think I won the silicon lottery. I can overclock it more, but it likes to overheat on the stock cooler.

>>60039286
What RAM you using phampai?

File: Capture2.png (18KB, 403x398px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 403x398px

>>60039301
Here's my Ram.

>>60039286
Shit, and I can't get my 1800x to 4.0 GHz without voltages going over 1.425

>>60039286
How did u test for stability?

>>60039408

Prime95, Cinebench R15, and Passmark

But it does like to overheat.

File: CPUz.png (24KB, 403x404px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 403x404px

Got it for free, had 2500k, not a huge upgrade but decent for non-k. Seems to stay at 3.8 with full load, and spikes to 4.0 without full load.

File: HWSnip.png (100KB, 1049x580px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1049x580px

>>60028213

File: yee - Copy.png (28KB, 399x400px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 399x400px

feels good to be team blue

hey /g/ how o you like the R71700?

which frequenxy would you recommend for everyday 3D modelling and rendering?

is 3.8 GHz stable and "safe" on the wraith stock cooler? or ust i settle for 3.6-3.7

>>60039338
Yeah but what model?

File: Capture3.png (235KB, 1125x534px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 1125x534px

>>60039968
G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series (2 x 8GB)
Model F4-3000C15D-16GVRB

>>60040072
thanks m8

File: 2017-04-13_22-54-58.png (30KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 403x402px

>buying an unlocked Intel CPU

File: 1492216863245.jpg (20KB, 469x312px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 469x312px

>>60040109

>>60039034
Goyim is plural, stupid goy.

>>60033246
>>60033752
Hahahaha oh wow.

File: cpu-z.jpg (144KB, 808x403px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 808x403px

2500k.

>>60040109
>buying an i5

File: ayyni.png (38KB, 415x412px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 415x412px

>tfw

>>60037176
mine is at 4.3GHz so hard to compare.

>>60040409
>pay more for an unlocked CPU
>run it at stock

Really makes you think.

>>60040409
nigga what are you doing, overclock that shit

File: check_em.png (43KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 417x413px

rate

>>60016004
n-nani?!?!

File: (You)r house.jpg (519KB, 940x641px) Image search: [Google]

519KB, 940x641px

>>60041393

>>60041545
Nah. The 32nm chips were pretty cool running. The 45nm chips though were the housefires.

File: cpuz2.png (26KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 403x402px

>>60015681
OP here, back with the stable version of muh OC :^)