You fags jelly of pic related?

Honestly? No.

I've used Macs for long enough to know that they're utter garbage. True Facebook machines.

>>60007658
nice wast of money, OP is a stupid fgt

>>60007708
I can't stop sucking dicks holy shit

>>60007658
>i7
>dual core
getting cucked hard...

>>60007658
>1.8k
Lmao. Poorfag pls

File: 8vpjFeZ.png (130KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 600x600px

>Dual core i7

>>60007658
>i7 instead of identical i5
But why?

>>60007941
because 2.4 is obviously faster than 2.0

>>60007990
Both have the same thermal limits, so it's not like you're really going to notice it during longer constant workload. You won't notice it during bursts either due the small difference.

>>60007658
>corelet

>>60007990

And neither will see a day over 1.4ghz thanks to throttlebook temps, so what does it matter?

>>60008043
Am I going to notice it while browsing facebook or posting pictures of my lunch on instagram?

>>60007658
>2 cores
>1800 dollarydoos
Wew

>>60008118
Nope, sorry.

>>60008152
Will I notice it while ordering dragon dildos?

>>60007658
Not at all.

What are you trying to prove? You just blew hundreds on a dual-core crock of shit because "i7!!!"

8GB RAM. Knowing Crapple, they probably also solder the RAM so you can't upgrade. 8GB is laughable for a 2,000 shekel machine.

256GB SSD. We've been out of the GB era for 2 years now. 256GB is netbook-tier.

In short, have fun with your 2,000 dollar internet browser

>>60008338
Yes, they will arrive 0,0001% sooner.

>>60008546
>autism

>>60008843
">autism"


>Someone gives me an objective standpoint! What a load of autism! Guys? WHY ARENT YOU JEALOUS OF MY MACBOOK!!!

tbqh not at all, unless the reason to do such a thing is that you just have tons of money

even then I'd rather be looking at an email asking me to pickup some gpus for buttcoins

>>60007658
CPU upgrade seems odd.
name your use case where that upgrade is noticeable compared to base and beats the 13" mbp touch bar (same $1799 price) which comes with a 28W CPU instead of 15W and has faster RAM (2133MHz LPDDR3 instead of 1866MHz)

File: 1433417169003.jpg (35KB, 300x200px) Image search: [Google]

35KB, 300x200px

>>60007658
Hahaha...Sprint. Laugh. Point at him and laugh!

File: ThrottleBody1_Desktop.png (691KB, 1400x1400px) Image search: [Google]

691KB, 1400x1400px

>>60007658
>Turbo boost up to 0.8 GHz

>>60009251
>constant high workloads for both cpu and gpu when turbo isn't possible which is like never.
This is true. Mostly. It's a lot less clear cut. Constant high workloads for one is enough unless the other is completely idling. Besides most programs try to utilize GPU acceleration.

Besides the benefit from couple extra mhz (and a bit extra cache) is negligible unless you're encoding 4K movies all the time, in which case a 13" laptop is a weird ass choice.

>>60008843
Bron I have a macbook mysemf but the one you bought is an atrocious buy. All points that anon said are right. Atleast spend soms more shekels then tot get some beter specs. For a few 100 more you could hacmve had 16GB + beter CPU

>Also dual core i7

>>60007658
stop being gay

>>60007941
To a Mac user, bigger number = better.

>1800

Senpai the jacket I'm wearing rn cost triple that

>>60009556
The whole mobile i5/i7 bullshit is just as common on Windows and basically all Android phones try to outnumber each other, anon.

Blame Intel for starting it.

>>60009620
blame IBM for starting it

>>60009641
Didn't it have some meaning then though?

File: cb15_performance.png (36KB, 655x242px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 655x242px

>>60009364
>Constant high workloads for one is enough unless the other is completely idling.
here's some review that looped cinebench r15 multi and there was not much fluctuations, so likely almost always at max cpu turbo and no thermal limits of the chassis where reached:
https://www.notebookcheck.net/Apple-MacBook-Pro-13-Late-2016-2-GHz-i5-without-Touch-Bar-Laptop-Review.182374.0.html

>Besides the benefit from couple extra mhz (and a bit extra cache) is negligible unless you're encoding 4K movies all the time, in which case a 13" laptop is a weird ass choice.
agreed, dual-core is an odd choice if you need cpu power

>>60009661
Well, it's a benchmark, so not the most realistic workload given it purely focuses on CPU performance. Also the result seems to be pretty much identical to ThinkPad P40 Yoga with a i7 6600U in multi (aka. pretty much same i7 Applel uses)

>>60009620
how's it bullshit?
should they all be named i7 because they have turbo boost and hyperthreading?

the real retardness is expecting desktop chips and mobile to be the same.

>>60009798
>should they all be named i7 because they have turbo boost and hyperthreading?
That would actually make some sense. Or limit i7 brand to real quad cores for mobile chips. There is a clear step from i3 to i5, the one from i5 to i7 is a bit cache and mhz that you won't notice without bench marking.

File: 11380261_1463441283949103_1750843480_n.jpg (43KB, 480x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 480x480px

>>60007658
>he can't afford shipping

>>60009790
>not the most realistic workload given it purely focuses on CPU performance.
not like compiling or encoding in software does use anything but your cpu.
can't think of that many common workloads where you would need peak performance for long.

>pretty much identical to ThinkPad P40 Yoga with a i7 6600U
but that's the base mbp with an i5-6360U

>>60009946
A lot of encoding software and Adobes CC stuff uses GPU acceleration. Though CC rarely got any constant workloads to be fair.

>can't think of that many common workloads where you would need peak performance for long.
That's generally true, though with encoding and compiling it obviously very task sensitive.

>but that's the base mbp with an i5-6360U
I know, I know. But at least in multicore it does have the same result as i7 6600U, so the extra 200mhz are clearly not that noticeable. (i5s from other Windows laptop got same score too, so it's not just Windows being shit)

File: 1479505071138.jpg (91KB, 614x673px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 614x673px

>>60007658
>selling i3s as i7s
really makes you go hmmmmmm

>>60010145
since when does an i3 have turbo boost?

>>60010212
>muh niggahurtz
its going to throttle anyways

File: desktop+macbook.png (606KB, 1088x840px) Image search: [Google]

606KB, 1088x840px

>>60007658
No.

>>60008843
Spotted the eurofag

File: 1491954248722.jpg (165KB, 578x712px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 578x712px

>>60007658

Nah my PC has better specs and cost me $230

>>60012714
>PC
What is it? 1938?

>>60012810
Wew, iToddler, calm down.

>dat wifi strength
Better buy a new airport express basesta- oh nevermind.

>>60008890
>autism

>>60007658
>$1799
I don't get it. My rMBP has a 2.6GHz processor, 8GB of ram, a 256GB PCIe SSD and a full array of ports and I bought it for $1400 at Best Buy two years ago. That's a full $400 more expensive

>>60007658
Not a maxed out 15 inch. What are you poor or something?

>>60007689
>>60007708
>>60007717
>>60007747
>>60007766
>>60007849
>>60007918
>>60007941
>>60008094
>>60008110
>>60008131
>>60008338
>>60008546
>>60009500
>>60010145
>>60010716
>>60015069
thanks for the salt guys, i was running low.

>>60017968
You're welcome, saved you a trip to the grocery store.

>>60017968
>begs for attention and "ur so lucky !" replies
>gets quite the opposite
>"LOL U FELL FOR THE BATE!! THANX 4 DA SALT!!"

>>60012810
yes, because "pretty and expensive" SCREAMS "modernity"

>>60017519
>>autism

Nah, my 2013 13" has better specs

Me, no. The latest Macbooks are so underwhelming compared to the previous models. Even Apple admitted it and used it as a reason to reboot the Mac Pro.

So if you're using it to browse the net, good for you. If you're planning to do work on it, I'm sorry for your loss.

File: IMG_20170415_223051.jpg (150KB, 1280x1231px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1280x1231px

>1700$
>Integrated graphics
>8gb of ram

You can't make this shit up

File: notgood.jpg (55KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x480px

>>60007658

>>60007658
Based fucking OP

Poors are triggered beyond belief in this thread holy shit

>have mid 2014 "retina" macbook pro
>16gb ram
>hdmi, magsafe, normal usb, sd card reader

yeah, ok

File: 1469347303634.jpg (2MB, 1800x4500px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1800x4500px

>>60007658
>2006-2015
>trackpad impossible to click near upper edge
>extremely loose near bottom edge
>overall flimsy diving board piece of shit
>even applel admitted it's shit and went back to solid non-click touchpads
>still has no real buttons
>relies on pressure sensitive gimmick bullshit
>if you press too lightly or too hard it does something completely different than what you intended
>shit tier 1mm travel chiclet kb
>OSX is a steaming pile of shit with horrendous battery management
>applel's solution is to cram in a massive heavy 95WHr battery to make up for it
>even XXXTREME GAMER cancer like razer blade with 4X the CPU/GPU power and 70WHr battery matches it in battery life in same tasks
>gets BTFO by 55WHr Yoga 2 in battery life in same tasks
>the battery takes up the space where a cooling system would've been in a laptop not designed by the world's thinnest and lightest gay hipsters
>overheats constantly from abysmal crippled cooling system
>throttles to 800mhz due to chronic overheating problems
>retina meme for "pros" have have <70% aRGB
>gloss mirror coating impossible to use with overhead lighting
>blurry as shit retina meme scaling
>shitbook air even worse with glossy 1366x768 TN eye cancer
>systemic battery explosion problems for over a decade

>2016+
https://9to5mac.com/2016/11/03/2016-macbook-pro-thunderbolt-compatibility-issues
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NYVjIjBMx6o
>can't use any existing TB3 devices
>can't use USB and wifi at the same time
>ultra shit tier zero travel kb
>keyboard louder than WWII cricket
>memetouch emojibar
>no USB-A
>no escape
>soldered ram
>soldered SSD
>tamper tape on battery screws
>applel falls for their own thin meme and uses 54WH battery
>2 hour battery life

http://www.howtogeek.com/198043/how-to-merge-folders-on-mac-os-x-without-losing-all-your-files-seriously
>it's 2017 and moving folders around in finder will STILL cause massive data loss

>macshit is good
Can we finally put an end to this meme?

>>60007658
Actually, no, and this is coming from a fan of a lot of Apple products. There really isn't anything that that generation imporved over previous, cheaper models