is late to learn programming?
>>60001173
Yeap. Is late even for find a reason for still live.
Yes but it's not too late to learn English.
>>60001173
Get off 4chins and do it OP, stop asking. Starting late will force you to be humbled by your younger peers, but that humble and curious approach is what will sustain your career if you end up liking it.
Your life is basically over wow.
If you aren't programming before learning how to walk you have no chance. Everyone DREAMS in code nowadays. You can't do ANYTHING at 30 years of age, 18 is the cutoff point for learning and careers.
>>60001201
Yes. Once you turn 15 or so, your brain shuts off and you lose the ability to ever learn anything new. You certainly can't possibly pick up something as nuanced and complex as Python. Just give up now old man
>>60001173
Good time to commit suicide, dude
Do it
>>60001173
Yes, should've started at half your current age, now fuck off.
unless you're a programming savant it's too late to pick up programming as a primary professional skill. you could pick up the basics.
>>60001173
Pretty much, yes.
I'm only 20, programming since 2013, currently studying meme theoretical computer science, yet I still feel like a fucking pajeet.
Im still hoping that by the time Im 30 I will have enough knowledge and skill to actually be employable on a non-meme, serious job.
It's far too late for you friend.
Except if you wanna be a webDev pajeet. Then go for it.>>60001199
>>60001173
If you have to ask then yes
Don't listen to these autists OP,
I'm 25, I started learning programming a year and a half ago, and I'm now a Jr. Full stack Developer.
Granted, I was a Sysadmin before this so I atleast know some shit.
It's not too late to become a pajeet.
>>60001619
>Jr. Full stack Developer.
Ruby doesn't count as real programming
Every retard can learn to make for loops on ten levels of abstraction
>>60001619
*15
Woops typo.
As long as you know your shit (Dream in code, combinatronics, base 2 to hexadecimal conversion with ease) you should be just fine, basic knowledge shit, y'know
>>60001663
>Ruby doesn't count as real programming
Kill yourself unless you solely mean rails for frontend and then kill yourself anyways but at least you aren't wrong. Ruby isn't a bad language in and of itself, and it's certainly "programming" despite where you elitist fucks try to move the goalpost on any given day.
>>60001759
>Ruby isn't a bad language in and of itself
That's where you're wrong, kid.
Ruby is useless shit, even in highlevel scripting context. Python is literally better for a degree of measure.
>>60001173
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WqWFYOxjZ54