Google and limits of search engines

File: 1280px-Yandex_logo_ru.svg.png (36KB, 1280x509px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 1280x509px

>>59997440
Yandex

>>59998112
>Non-US company
>not respect your freedom
>ugly interface
fuck off mongoloid

>>59998382
>wanting US companies
>thinking US companies give a shit about your freedom
You're an absolute retard.

>>59997440
DuckDuckGo.
>>59998403
Yandex spy on their users.

>>59998418
>Google doesn't

>>59998418
DuckDuckGo sells your data too.

>>59998403
Still better than your shithole coutry with noname companies cucked by your governmant.

>>59997440
2006 google was infinitely better. Google is so obsessed with """"helping"""" you search that when you look for "how to close" it instead searches for "how to open" and when you look for "buy new windows" it looks for "buy osx" when you're actually looking for new windows. Nevermind their insistence on providing politically motivated results and censoring what they don't like, which further mitigates the quality of results they provide.

Bing is significantly worse because while they try to apply the same tricks, M$ uses pure rule-based systems when google uses a mix of rule-based and ML.

Other search engines are significantly worse because they take results from bing and google and mix them together which fucks everything up with almost only purely incorrect results.

Basically any search engine that stops being fancy will automatically be orders of magnitudes better than google. Just index pages in the classical way and crawl in the usual way using a usual indexing scheme and you have successfully overtaken google.

>>59998432
[citation needed]

>>59997440
Red pill is I go to your mum's house and browse there with her accounts while she sucking me off.

Related question, since when does putting the search term under quotation marks stopped working, for looking up exact phrases? For example, the other day I wanted to look up any mentions of "e=" and "religion" together, but Google flat out ignores the "e=" bit.

>>59998747
He only uses Yandex because of the beautiful women.

>>59998112
TITS OR GTFO

>>59998112
CYKA

honestly, it would be cool to have a search engine that ignored results from social media, that includes news sites, wikipedia and blogs (whatever hosted in blogspot wordpress tumblr).

>>59998879
kek

>>59999063
(((tits)))

>>59997440
startpage

actually, why aren't there any projects trying to build distributed search engines, dns server, etc without any regulations ?

>>60000362
There have been, but they're blacklisted by the media just like tor and i2p. Governments pay the media to shill against anything that isn't regulated.

>>60000859
really ? can you name some ?

>>59999171
[searchterm] -blogspot -facebook -wsj - wikipedia -tumblr

???

>You are so unsecure about your privacy that you only use things that are completly safe
Oh man, are you guys doing something illegal or why do you care so much about this shit? The government will give a shit about what you do then.

File: hack.png (6KB, 40x40px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 40x40px

>>59997440
https://www.wolframalpha.com/

Also give us an example of obscure search that Google fails to deliver and maybe I can teach you a trick or two.

I'm a search sniper by the way.

>>59998817
>Basically any search engine that stops being fancy will automatically be orders of magnitudes better than google. Just index pages in the classical way and crawl in the usual way using a usual indexing scheme and you have successfully overtaken google.
You don't know what you're talking about. A dumb index search will just give you billions of Viagra website hits. The Internet is cock full of low quality crap filled with indexable keywords and SEO tecniques.

>>59997440
You know how a lot of people in CS do projects to learn CS like develop their own OS or compiler? I've given some thought to doing something like this and it might be a more practical project to spend time on learning more about depths of CS. What do you guys think, working on a search engine project be a good idea and better use of time than something like a hobby OS or compiler?
I mean if you where trying to work through textbooks learning about data mining, ML, etc wouldn't this be a good hobby project to apply what you're learning?

>>60003253
This is true. But wouldn't it be better to apply more than just classical algorithms to this, like implement some of the best research and techniques from the fields of ML, AI, etc?

Also I have a question about the legality of this. Do most sites consider it a breach of TOS and is crawling and storing their sites in your database as illegal as pirating/copyright infringement?

>>60002525
teach us some cool tricks

>>60004734
Check this out:

https://www.exploit-db.com/google-hacking-database/

>>60005688
Do you like the book by Johnny Long?

>>60005721
I don't read books. I downloaded 10 GB of videos about this subject tho. They teach similar things.

>>60003253
How to spot a retard.jpg

Everyone complaining about who is stealing the most data: please use searx and gtfo