So now that Ryzen is out for a while, are you satisfied with

>>59991428
Fucking YES. Also a pretty decent launch for a new uarch, Intel fucked up X99 so much more and it was only a new platform.

>Was the waiting worth it?
Not really, but at least AMD finally has SOMETHING semi-competitive for gaymur retards to buy up

>>59991428
The 1600 immediately became the price/performance king on release, and this is before Zen+ improves things even further.

File: something something.png (591KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 640x480px

>>59991428
I'm not buying any new CPUs in next 10 years, pretty happy with an old APU chip.

But Zen's performance/price/power consumption/etc proposition seems to be pissing off some haters incredibly, which is so funny to observe.

>>59991480
so dumb

>>59991428
I'm decently satisfied with it. "Upgraded" from a 2500k @4.4Ghz to a 1700 at 3.8Ghz. It might be worse in emulators but it's faster when rendering stuff in blender by far and in games it does about as well.

It's nice all in all, but I'm really waiting for Ryzen 2 since apparently I can just reuse my motherboard. I'm hoping they'll make some big improvements to the max clock speed, even hitting 4.4GHz again would be a huge improvement. 4.8GHz like Kabylake would be a dream.

Already have a 5930k so couldn't care less about Ryzen.. Focusing on getting Vega out first would have been better in my opinion.

File: Aqh1ETYCIAI3GOl.jpg_large.jpg (48KB, 909x585px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 909x585px

Still waiting for the mATX boards to stop sucking

>>59991802
Vega won't ever earn as much money as Zen can in servers. Also look how much did Zen improve AMD's reputation, a GPU wouldn't do that. They have a gap because Polaris highend chip apparently got canned (the other GPUs are 20nm ports), but before that, their highend was competetive, although gaymurs favoured nvidia's chip.

What kind of performance difference is there between the ryzen 7s and the ryzen 5s?

>>59991835
2

>>59991833
If AMD can edge in on Nvidia Quadro and Tesla Vega can make shitloads of money.

>>59991833
machine learning is hot shit though.

>>59991498
Between the 1600 and the 1600x what is the actual difference?

Still haven't decided on a motherboard and ram, cpu arrived 3 weeks ago. On one hand the expensive x370 motherboards have better ram compatibility but on the other hand I don't feel like spending almost the same for fast ram.
Probably going to get a more budget x370 and a cheap 2666 kit.
Possibly upgrade them when things are most stable.

>>59991833
>20nm ports meme again
Polaris is an extension of the hardware development project they did with Sony. Some of the elements were even developed by or in conjunction with Sony engineers.

>>59991852
>>59991879
Naples can still earn more over Xeon, it's a bet that is more sure-shot.
Not saying that Vega doing great in pro/server wouldn't also earn nicely, but Zen was more important for their turnaround. Also Vega is probably on time and could not have been accelerated more.

>>59991817
My my Gigabyte Gaming-3 works fine. Got my ram up to 3200 using the gigabyte oc application.

>>59991914
it's not a meme, they publicly said that they are redoing some chips intended for 20nm process to finfets. 2 years later, there is nothing else that could have fit that description, except for Poalris 10/11. It all fits in.

>>59991894
1600X has higher stock clocks and XFR, it's probably better binned.

>>59991428
Waiting for my Pro4 to show up in the mail so I can build this bitch desu

>>59992016
So is it worth the 30 dollars to go for the 1600x over the 1600?

I'm very excited for Zen+

They did quite the improvement. Being from lul FX CPUs to an acceptable competitor in Ryzen is pretty great.

Plus now they are the CPUs to go for workstation and anything not exclusive to gayming.

>>59992050
$60, the X doesn't come with a cooler.

>>59991833
Yea but nvidia are bigger bastards than Intel and AMD have no decent 1440p card. Vega fills in that performance gap in the market.

>>59992050
Like >>59992068 said, the X doesn't come packaged with a cooler, so if you're comfortable overclocking your answer is probably no.

>>59991902

Dual rank RAM works wonders and is cheaper.

>>59992068
>>59992093

I have a cooler already so that's not a problem just wondering about the chips themselves

>>59992099
yeah, dual-rank modules that work at 2666 should be as good as 2933 singleranks. Maybe even somewhat better.

https://www.golem.de/news/ram-overclocking-getestet-ryzen-profitiert-von-ddr4-3200-und-dual-rank-1704-127262.html

Pardon my french.

>>59992093
Any board recommendations for the 1600?

>>59992189
I haven't read any reviews yet but based on specs and price I like the Asus X370 Prime Pro

>>59991480
they're not gamer chips tho

>>59992222
dont get assuss on am4
it the worst brand on that platform

>>59992222
nice quads but X370 is unneeded, get something like Prime B350-Plus.

>>59991817
>tfw waiting for an ITX board
So far the only ones I'm aware of are from ASrock, and I've only heard bad things about ASrock.

File: 2017-04-18 22.05.29.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>59992189
the gaming 5 seems to work for me, but its 200$

ill sell you my extra msi x370 carbon for like $145

>>59992283
ITX is still too much of a meme for my taste desu senpai

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170419_162748.jpg (1MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1152px

>>59992271
>unneeded

Not if you want more than 4 SATA ports and 4 USB on the I/O. I have the Gigabyte X370 Auroras gaming K5. It SUCKS. The UEFI/BIOS is a fucking joke. No ability to manually set your voltage, no LLC, terrible m.2 slot location. For under/overclocking you have to rely on DVID voltage off setting. Even then, the voltage is all over the place. There is no reason my stock 1700 should be getting 1.25v under load when everyone else on other boards is reporting under 1.1v. Gigabyte pulled a bait and switch. The guru3D review of the board showed all the options I said are missing minus LLC. Lastly, the fucking Intel gigabit driver shows up as a removable device! Bootleg as fuck. Gigabyte a shit. They were shit for FX and are shit for Ryzen. Never had an Asus board disappoint.

This board is 2 days old for me and I already hate it. It's going back to the store and I'm coughing up the extra $50 for the Asus ROG crosshair. Why is it everyone says the Asus boards are bad?

>>59992294
Anon can you do me a favor. Take a picture of your UEFI? I have that board and I'm >>59992352
A bit unsatisfied as you can see. Maybe I got a bum board?

>>59992352
They fucked the ram at launch.

You can get 3200 ddr4 working now though

>>59992428
I have 32GB across 4 sticks anyway, so I'll only be seeing 2400mhz regardless. I should have just listened to my intuition when I was in the store. Gigabyte is going back. Crosshair here I come.

>>59991428
I'm still at 2400, but I'm gonna upgrade as soon as I'll get some money.

>>59992440
That's a pretty serious price tag on that crosshair tho compared to some of the other posted mobos. Which Cpu do you have? The Asus x370 prime pro looks like a solid deal but im seeing a ton of bitching about bios updates screwing up

>>59992352
That is the k5 not the regular 5. Don't think there are reviews for this one yet. You should have bclk oc but they cut corners in other areas. Gigabyte's x370 line up is weird.

>>59992412
>I have that board
i got the gaming 5, not the k5 so idk if the bios will be different. gimme a moment though. i do agree the bios is a bit lacking compared to my old asus z97 board, and even my media centers asrock z87.

>>59992068
The 1600 cooler won't be able to handle overclocking it to a 1600x level. If it came with a wraith max instead, maybe.

So if you're going to overclock, get the 1600x and your cooler of choice. If you just want plug and play, get the 1600.

>>59992487
>if you're going to overclock, get the 1600x and your cooler of choice

Might as well bump up to 1700 at that point

>>59992512
Extra 80 bucks tho and still need a mobo

>>59992477
That would explain it. Steer clear of the K5. It's garbage. Looks nice and nothing else. They cut all the wrong corners.
>>59992479
Thanks anon. And yeah, gigabyte boards in general seem to be lacking.
>>59992476
I have the non X 1700. I just need a reliable board so I can undervolt, 8 SATA ports. I've been on ROG boards forever. I don't mind the price tag. I've seen the prime pro and the same bitching about lack of updates. Precisely why I'm looking at the crosshair. It being their "flagship" motherboard, it'll get speedier updates.

>>59991480
Who would buy AMD for their gaming PC though?

Naples is the only interesting thing to come out of AMD for ages.

File: 170420200123.jpg (144KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 1024x768px

>>59992479

>>59992189
Basically any B350 board

X370's are a gaymur meme. Only buy them if you're overclocking an R7 or want to overclock your baseclock to get RAM faster than 3200mhz.

AMD's releasing a microcode update in May that should improve RAM compatibility and maybe even up the multiplier so you can get 3600+ working without messing with the baseclock.

>>59992512
So we went from 1600 to 1700, might as well upgrade to 1800X. Can we all agree it's the only worthwhile ryzen?

>>59992569
meant for >>59992548

>>59992559

Anyone who enjoys better gaming experiences with less input lag, superior minimum frames and they plan to put Vega through it's paces with infinity fabric

>>59992512
The 1600x = 1800x binning with 2 cores disabled for half the price.

>>59992559
I would because it's cheaper at very similar performance. I'm not rich enough to pay 100 more dollars for 5% more fps.

File: 170420200111.jpg (149KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 1024x768px

>>59992548
>>59992569
screen of the main page as well.

>>59991428
I don't know but both the 1700 and 1600/1600x are incredible CPUs. I want to grab a 1700 and then go all in with Zen+. They are very good right now, but a revision with 7nm would be amazing.

>>59992569
Yup. That has the features I'm missing. We have 3 different but damn ear the same boards. Gigabyte naming scheme is retarded. Yours is the gaming 5. Mine the gaming K5. Thanks anon.

>>59992625
have you tried updating bios? im surprised the board advertised with the external bclk doesnt have as many voltage options.

>>59992599
I feel like I'm playing a game from 1996

When will these people make a BIOS that doesn't look like ass?

File: 1355535874424.png (79KB, 250x238px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 250x238px

>>59991428
>are you satisfied with it?
The CPU and performance is great for the dosh. Just wish Gigabyte would fix their buggy as shit firmware. Real tired of having to cold boot my machine since the bios doesn't see my non-vidya cards otherwise; the board is fine otherwise.
>Was the waiting worth it?
Yes, considering it was an upgrade from the original Bulldozer 8150

>>59992636
Yea the board only has 1 BIOS revisions. f2. Flashed no issues. Added nothing. Only voltage things they have is voltage VID and voltage VID(SOC). It does have a multipler changer, but that's worthless without LLC and manual voltage controls. voltage offsets of up to -0.300 or +0.300v. And BLCK clocking sucks ass.

>>59991428
Yep. Bought a 1700 and it's fantastic. Enjoying the autists on here raging about it too.

>>59992647
Gotta make it like that so you feel like a hax0r

Anyone with the 1600x what kinds of Temps are you getting and what cooler you using?

>>59991852
AMD will never overcome the industry locking cancer that is CUDA

>>59992089
My Fury X works great at 1440p, long as you aren't a retard and disable or don't use much useless Tessalation.

>Tfw Doom at 1440p
Jesus, what a beautifully optimized game

>>59991428
That's a lot of cheap H1B labour, no wonder AMD was able to cut costs so much.

File: 1439320168559.jpg (13KB, 381x286px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 381x286px

>>59991428
>all those irrelevant employees

This was the only person that made Ryzen a success

>>59991480
They destroy Intel in HEDT and server workloads, and these aren't even the server chips lmao

>>59993137
yup, those where grunt worker

>>59993141
>destroy
LOL

The 6900K and 1800X trade blows here and there but that's it. The 1800X is more of a glorified 6800K, but with more cores.

Intel isn't going to lower prices because AMD didn't come up with anything that could threaten the 6950X's standing.

You people thought this was a good thing for the CPU industry but you're clearly wrong. Intel is only going to come up with better--and more expensive--products in the future.

They literally sat on their asses and didn't have anything in store for Ryzen's launch because they expected it to be a flop. Now that it sees AMD came up with something to match the 6800K, Intel's only going to get much more greedy and innovative.

>>59991773
I think you just want IPC improvements. Nobody wants their hourse to burn down on a 200w babbylake at 5Niggahurtz.

>>59993243
>The 6900K and 1800X trade blows here and there but that's it
>$1000 CPU vs $500 CPU
Nice one, anon.

>>59993243
No one is going to pay 3.5x as much for two extra cores with the same IPC.

>>59991773
No way Ryzen falls behind against a 2500k at that clock speed. Where are your metrics? Can you not play games you previously could? Do note that future emulators like rpcs3 could scale with cores on some games, so you're better off in the long-run.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170420_130407.jpg (3MB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2048x1152px

>>59993243
Yea nah. Here's my bone stock r7-1700

>>59993281
>here and there
You do realize what that means, right? It means the 1800X provides 6900K performance in certain scenarios. If Ryzen traded blows with the 6900K 100% of the time, then yes, it would truly be an impressive CPU.

>>59993298
I would. I have the money to. I'm not going to buy Ryzen because I'm not poor. It's as simple as that.

If AMD truly wanted to be competitive, they would have aimed for the 1800X to trade blows with the 6950X. Only then it would Ryzen definitely be worth its price.

>>59992559
1600 is perfect for gaming atm, plus it gives you great multithreaded performance outside of games.

Unless your are running two GTX 1080s in SLI, your performance is always going to be bottlenecked by your GPU anyway, it's just most gamers are dumb and overestimate the role of CPUs in game performance.

>>59993314
>phone picture

for fucks sake anon

File: Intel-Questions-about-Ryzen.png (55KB, 1052x852px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 1052x852px

>6950X
wild shill appear

>>59993383
Was sending a quick pic of the results to a buddy who was on the fence between Intel and AMD for his new build. So I sent it to him in a text

>>59993329
You're so fucking full of shit. 8-core vs 8-core Ryzen matches Intel. AMD didn't put out a 10-core part because they realize the 6950X is more about bragging rights than actually making Intel any money.

>>59993409
alright then

>>59993399
I laughed and nice get

>>59993399

Why the fuck is Intel answering questions about Ryzen?

File: 1492458937885.png (29KB, 617x837px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 617x837px

>>59993329
really fires the neurons

>>59993450
damage control

>>59993450
Intel allegedly sent out ryzen review guidelines to certain tech bloggers

>>59993487
Like what? "make sure people don't know how good it is for half the price of ours"?

>>59993314
about same single core as my 2500k at 4500mhz

>>59993487
>>59993494
No such thing happened.

Though for the people who keep shilling Ryzen: this is the first time AMD has made a good product since the Pentium 4 days. This may or may not be a short-lived victory for AMD. Just keep that in mind.

Jim Keller is good, but he only worked with AMD for the development of Ryzen. Now that he's gone, I highly doubt AMD can replicate Ryzen's success.

>>59993523

>Jim Keller is good

You put an extra 'o' there by mistake. He's the reason that Apple A10 Fusion chip is insanely fast while being more efficient.

CERTIFIED SHIT WRECKER

>>59993505
correction, my 2500k scores 1699 at 4.5ghz

Single threaded

>>59993314

I wonder what your 1700 would get on 4ghz though.

>>59993523
Honestly I hope it's not just a one-off. Competition is good for us all no matter what anyone personally believes about AMD

>>59993567
Around 2100 I believe. My friends 1600X does 4.0ghz out of the box and scores around there. The 1500X all the way to the 1800X are all the same single core when clocked the same. Just more or less cores

>>59993648
not bad honestly

If i had the money id get a 1600, coffee lake is bound to be extremely expensive anyway lol

And buying new cpus with less than 6 physical cores is just dumb for anything but facebook machines

waaay too many poo's in that picture. Anything more than two and janitor only positions and its a waste.

File: 5b2.png (212KB, 922x882px) Image search: [Google]

212KB, 922x882px

>1600 is $340
>1600x is $400

Send help.

>>59993810
get 1600
oc to 4ghz
???
put free heatsink on head when feeling ill

>>59993810
Fuck where you live? I'm sorry.

Also, could you have someone else order for you and just pay them shipping?

if 500$ magically falls into my hands i'll make a ryzen build, otherwise i'm perfectly happy with my 8350 build and my i7-860 build

>>59994027
I'm coming from a q6600 lol just waiting for payday to make my orders

File: open-fire-885860_960_720.jpg (136KB, 960x640px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 960x640px

>>59993243
>No graphs
>No charts
>No links
>No evidence at all
The second Shoah has arrived. Get in, shekelchaser.

>>59991428
1500x is serving me pretty well

>>59992352
>Not if you want more than 4 SATA ports and 4 USB on the I/O
That's a silly reason.

>>59992512
I got my wife a 1600X and myself a 1700.

Can't really tell the difference between the 2 until I start doing shit like gaming and running some vms at which point the 1700 is better.

Realistically unless you are trying to find a performance difference, there really isn't one.

>>59991428
NEEDS MORE GIGAHURTZ

http://valid.x86.fr/6fw8x3

File: ishygddt-gif.gif (1MB, 264x264px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 264x264px

>>59991480
>AMD releases something somewhat competitive in gaming, destroying application workloads
>"Yeah it's a CPU for gaymur retards"

>>59991428
Nah, I'm waiting for Ryzen 2 now

>>59993523
pssst.
intel is just tweaking their core architecture.
amd will do the same for the next 10 years.

File: ryzen.jpg (60KB, 399x401px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 399x401px

>>59993648
>>59993567
This is my r7 1700 at 3.95ghz. It's my 24/7 OC. 4ghz requires over 1.425v on my chip, whereas 3.95 only needs 1.393

>>59993243
Fucking lol
The 1700 which costs one third of the price of the 6900K beats it in most benchmarks

I got an r7 1700 to replace my 4770k system that got taken out by my ANUS mobo. It wrecks that i7 in compile times and compression while being about the same in games with less heat and power usage. On top of that my pc in general just feels faster with all these threads and my multitasking ability can't even be compared to before.

There isn't a better workstation cpu for the money.

File: Screenshot_20170421-172251.jpg (261KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1080x1920px

>>59993243
>>59991428
>>59993329
Even the 1700 is on par or new the 6900K in most benchmarks, pic related

>>59993314
Lol a Ryzen 1700 on par with a 6950X, doesn't the 6950X cost like $1500?

>>59991428
I'm happy about this I still own an 4770k and I have no need for upgrade now ( especially since I don't game and when I used to and If I ever game again it's competitive games that require low resources ) - this being said all these releases from AMD just forces intel to act on and either lower price or speed up their game.

So by the time I upgrade intel products would offer me a better deal hopefully, then if that's not the case we'll see who's the king in the next 3 - 5 years.

>>59996601
Thats the point.
I dont take sides but clearly this year Q2 amd takes the price/perf cake. This is like athlon64 all over again.

>>59996718
That's ridiculous. Intel must be shitting themselves.

How much of the server market do you think they will steal with Naples? I'm guessing all the low to midrange servers will switch to AMD due to similar price/performance benefits?

I don't think AMD has any really high end Naples processors do they? Like nothing beyond 32 core?

>>59992853
>>59992647
the only bad part of it is the top row, high contrast is very good to have.

>>59996769
It's not the contrast that's the problem, it's that they throw in all that techno-edgy design that makes it look like a menu from an old game about space battles or somethin. Functionally it's fine but it feels kinda teenager-ish IMO.

I can't really offer a better design option though so fuck me.

>>59996439
6950X is a fucking abortion.

>>59996636
>intel products would offer me a better deal
Yeah like BESIN FALLS

>>59991773
>>59993306
>single threaded performance
>for an emulator

Yeah. That shit only matters for Dolphin and PCSX 2.
Cemu being garbage is Cemu's problem. PS3, PS4, Xbone, and so on emulators will need multithreading.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8_YQ0-rzM5I

>>59992636
This is a dumb question, but what is external bclk?

it's like reliving athlon days

athlon was ever so slightly slower than intel
but intel was more expensive and housefire

same thing happening here, except for gaming crowd devolving from pc geeks that like to game into pcmaster/r/race

I think VALUE solution will eventually gain momentum.
socket every year might not cut it anymore without bribes

>>59997114
>for Dolphin and PCSX 2
it doesn't really, sure if you care only about benchmark numbers it does, get a dual core for it

but even 8350 runs dolphin well

>>59991428
>broadwell-e getting btfo
Yes

>>59996752
>has any really high end Naples
you know that intel limit is 24 cores right now for two socket boards?

64 vs 48
naples is really really high end

>>59992853
>Gotta make it like that so you feel like a hax0r
I for one can't see shit if it's not contrasted enough. that bios looks ideal to me
think about ergonomics, not everyone has eyes like yours
one of the reasons why free software sucks btw

>>59997309
Again my comment wasn't about the contrast it was that the border graphics that they added to stylize it look crummy to me.

>>59992294
>Amada sticker
nice

>>59992412
>>59992294
fucking weabooooeeesss
>>59997476

What's this machine intelligence feature?

>>59993399
>999
>33
>99
beautiful

>>59997264
Wait really?
That 32 core CPU that Intel is making is for 1p only?

>>59997637
they delayed it, so it's irrelevant for now
also it's 250w serverfire

>>59997555
Ryzen has a neural net on the chip that leans how to precache better.
It's only about a 1-2% improvement over repeating the same task a few times.
Not much, but it's still really interesting. It's something that was theorized for a while, and just to see 1-2% is so interesting.

Wish I could find the benchmark demonstrating this.
>when you try the same thing on Intel CPUs, it just gets worse each time

Someone here with a 1600 on a Gigabyte Gaming 3 who can tell me his clockspeed, Vcore, temps and VRM temp.
Although buildzoid said that the VRM requirements for Ryzen are really low, i'm still concerned about the 4 phase design in the long run.
I want to keep this build trough college until 2020 or 2021 and then upgrade to hopefully AM5, DDR5 and whatever Vega equivalent will come out that time.

>>59992283
I heard that asrock is really good now and asus quality has dropped a lot

>>59998043
>>>/pcbg/

>>59998251
This isn't necessarily a /pcbg/ question, i'm set on most parts i just want to know about the quality of the Gigabyte G3 before i buy it, but i'll post there anyways.

>>59993810
Nobody wants your monopoly money.

I WANT TO UPRGRADE
>gaymin
>[email protected]
>Dont really need to

Goddamn 2600k was too good investment and now I cant upgrade and feel good about it.

Fuck, I've never seen so much brown people on a tech-related team.

is ryzen good?
Well, lets see here
I have a build, its not waiting for a modern gpu, what it has in it right now is a 'oh fuck, I need a gpu to output video' gpu that is so old it had no/few hardware decoders for video.

cpu alone plays youtube 1080 better then my other computer with a bit more modern gpu

It plays 4k and barely breaks 10% use

It plays 8k and is still under 40% before I even overclocked the motherfucker.

To say its above and beyond my expectations is an understatement.

>>60000409
Oh, I should also point out that the cpu runs so cool that touching the heatsync feels colder then the room its in.

>>59991428
Still waiting for more stable motherboard platforms. Memory controller is still a mess. Very good architectural foundation though.

>>59991428
Worth da weight XD
but yeah, like my 1700, I can do 10 things at once now without slowing down

[email protected] owner here, it is funny to see 5-10% cpu and <30W usage in some games, while getting shutter free experience. My old 2500non-k is complete shit compared to 1600.

Firebox sometimes shows 0% usage while playing 1080p youtube video.

>>59991879
amd is useless there because cuda is default in industry because nvidia has shilled for it hard because it has more resources to shill for its proprietary shit

>>60001804
I'm upgrading from a 2500k too. Got everything but the CPU and my second SSD. Was hoping to catch a 1600X sale and hoping I hit the silicon lottery. :(

Not in a rush... but kind of anxious at the same time.

My 2500k "idles" often at like 10%+ a lot of the time, with just some browsers, IRC, discord, and something playing on youtube. And that can be enough to make it feel sluggish switching around.

[email protected] here
using with 3200mhz rams at cl14

literally the best bang for buck

compile times are fucking amazing, while playin stutter free gaymen

>>60001932
there's a project to build an llvm cuda compiler or some shit so that cuda code can be reused with other gpus

>>60002149
Nvidia will sue, I guarantee it.

>>60001932
>>60002149
also, cuda's success probably has more to do with everything else (opencl, vulkan, directcompute, etc) being a total cunt to use than with nvidia shilling (though handing out high-end gpus to phd students would go a long way in research-heavy fields like AI)

instead of writing your compute kernels in some shader language bs like in opencl or directcompute, with cuda you're just writing them as C functions mixed in with your regular code. they're still tagged as gpu stuff and i imagine there's a bunch of rules around what you can and can't do in them but it seems far easier to deal with than opencl (and from sample code i saw it looks like cuda does a bit more behind the scenes with stuff like uploading the kernel code and setting args for it and whatever)

t. played with opencl a bit like five years ago and looked at some cuda stuff more recently to see what it was like

>>60002149
>>60002158
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NVIDIA_CUDA_Compiler
https://github.com/apc-llc/nvcc-llvm-ir
this?
>>60002244
Yes, correct. By shilling I mean investing and pushing it, while it looked like AMD didnot care much for OpenCL.

>>60002280
>while it looked like AMD didnot care much for OpenCL.
I don't think AMD cared for anything over most of the last decade desu senpai

File: 0bbfddc9c03fc4bd3a3e23af32ea82fc7add863410095522d433d8c3fe46b60e.gif (365KB, 2000x1153px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 2000x1153px

>>59993450
Intel is in full damage control because the waitfags are on suicide watch now

File: r1600.png (13KB, 405x400px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 405x400px

>>59993314
Theres something wrong there. I'm getting almost 2000 single threaded on stock on a 1600.

Because of dual rank memory perhaps?

>>59991428
It's great. Also fuck Microsoft. Was actually a little challenging finding a way to get win 7 on this machine.

File: 1600.jpg (65KB, 417x413px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 417x413px

>>60002980
>>59993314
why do you guys get such different numbers?

>>60002980
dual rank what, 2166? how many sticks?


Specifics, anon.

>>60003116
Different CPUID benchmark version, I had the same

>>60003116
2500k at 4.5ghz for reference i guess

CPU-z v 1.79, update cpu-z

File: 2500k 4500mhz.png (14KB, 403x402px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 403x402px

>>60003265
forgot pic durr

>>59993523
>Now that he's gone, I highly doubt AMD can replicate Ryzen's success.
Good thing they don't have to. They just need to improve on it. Which is easy enough for them to do given that they spent years polishing the turd known as Bulldozer.

>>59996439
What temperatures are you getting? And are you using the stock cooler? I got a 1700 but haven't overclocked it yet

I cant be satisfied because no mini itx
wtf AMD

>>60003922
>inb4 Biostar

>>60004125
not even on sale

File: boom.gif (674KB, 414x317px) Image search: [Google]

674KB, 414x317px

>>59993523
He probably left them with a guideline for the next couple of Zen iterations on what to do to get better performance.

And I'm sure the eggheads over at AMD could manage to follow the words of a literal god.

AMD has until 2020 of being just as good as Intel. After that, it's hazy. Intel may go full prescott again and AMD will regain the crown, Intel could make a brand new arch that isn't based off a 2 decade old one so that we see some new performance instead of 1% gains every year.

>>59992265
Not anymore. They're patched up, I'm running a prime pro without issue

>>60003529
Custom loop. Normal gaymen is around 50-55c. It idles at about 32c with ambient temps around 23-24c

>>59993810
Sucks to be poor

>>59993032
If only all game designers actually put effort into their games.
Vulkin is our savior

File: 1481301102619.jpg (40KB, 720x720px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 720x720px

>>60003529
I'm running my 1700 @ 3.7/1.25. Temps ~75c in p95 and 65c in games. Idles between 30-40c. All on stock cooler.

>>59993810
I got mine off amazon.ca for $280 bro, it was a sale though. watch the prices on pcpartpicker.

>>60010361
the 1600 that is, I haven't looked at the X.

>>59992049
It just shipped today finally. Fucking superbiiz

>>59991428

I see a lot of Pajeet

>>59991428
i am. but its not like anyone cares.

File: 1465231066729.jpg (124KB, 300x719px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 300x719px

>>59991428
What did he mean by this

>>60013133
Dr. Su, I'm P.O.O

>>60013160
You're a big pajeet