>41% more expensive for 24% more performance overall
>king of corelets at 4c/8t
>have to get expensive mobo to OC
>does not include a cooler
>4.2 gigahurtz housefire vs nice and clean 3.2 Ghz
>socket is probably dead by now
How can Intel ever recover?
>>59986762
>How can Intel ever recover?
More megahurtz
Longer bipeline
>>59986762
NOOOOOOOOOOO
Adm is better for FOSS as well. Intel is a huge botnet
>>59987038
>Implying that AMD is not part of the poonet
>>59987038
You can cripple IME but you can't do shit about the arm cpu botnet in poozen.
>>59986785
How come you don't compare two CPUs in the same priceclass?
i5-7400 beats R5 1400
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7400-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1400/3886vs3922
i5-7500 beats R5 1500X
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7500-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1500X/3648vs3921
i5-7600 beats R5 1600
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7600-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600/3890vs3919
i5-7600K beats R5 1600X
http://cpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Intel-Core-i5-7600K-vs-AMD-Ryzen-5-1600X/3885vs3920
>>59987830
Not in reality.
>>59987830
NOOOOOOOOOO STOP
>>59987830
Their overall speed is weighed heavily towards single core for ((((((some reason)))))). If you look at the actual single/multicore speeds the Ryzen CPUs win every time. Also, they pull the prices off random fleabay auctions and shit 3rd party sellers on Amazon, so they're hardly reliable.
>>59987830
Userbenchmark I trust you, I'll go buy 7700k for my blender workstation build where I also render my little animations and stuff I create.
Thnx.