Why do you not love me anymore?

File: __d_va_and_mercy_overwatch_drawn_by_meowlian__e4075ea861b12ec774ca23adb8ab1ed0.jpg (939KB, 3541x3545px)

939KB, 3541x3545px

>>59979761
I don't hate java, but I don't particularly enjoy it either.

Because people here don't work

All entry-level jobs are in webdev now.

>>59979761
because java is too complicated, using dynamically typed languages and no objects is so much easier

I still love you

>>59979761
I never loved you

>>59979971
>because java is too complicated
Nigga you crazy.

>>59979761
It was a one time fling. I found a new girl.


I hope we can still be friends.

https://pastebin.com/87bdsd1r

this is why

Because unlike your language, the VM implementations you're running on are inherently unsafe.

>>59980138
Why didn't you just push chars to stack and then pop onto a new string?

Don't blame Java for your own retardation.

>>59980210
Not my solution. That's the "proper" solution to the problem on leetcode

S-L-O-W

>>59979761
java my love i will never leave you, i just use others sometimes not by my choice if i could just use you i would but others don't know who you are. or what you can do.

>>59979971

>using dynamically typed languages and no objects is so much easier

>>59979761
We don't hate you. We just hate Oracle.

>>59980239
Then explain why you're using a retarded solution that's not even yours to show that java is shit

>>59979761
If I wanted a heavy language with lots of conveniences, I'd use C#.

>>59985526

>with lots of conveniences
Are you talking about the same language?

>>59979761
I still love you in the sense that you give me money each month.

However, I do hate Larry Ellison, please stop seeing him behind me back.

>>59979761
I love you, but clojure is so pleasure... sorry.

>>59985553
C# with .NET holds your hand through everything. It's does what Java fucked up trying to do.

>>59979761
I never loved you, awful shit.

>>59985598

Oh no, I agree. C# is full of convenience. Java has none of it, Java is defined by its boilerplate.

>>59980138
jesus christ, have you ever looked at the String API? this isn't Java's fuck up - it's yours.

public static String reverseWords2(String sentence) {
    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder(sentence.length() + 1);
    String[] words = sentence.split(" ");
    for (int i = words.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        sb.append(words[i]).append(' ');
    }
    sb.setLength(sb.length() - 1);  // Strip trailing space
    return sb.toString();
}

Yes, still not a succinct as the Python version, but performance is better I guarantee. and plus if all you're going to be doing is reversing words, then you'd be using Python anyway. As part of a larger application the above solution isn't bad.

>>59980239
https://leetcode.com/problems/reverse-words-in-a-string/#/solutions
I checked anon. I'm not seeing your solution anywhere. There is no editorial solution, and all the top Java solutions are highly optimized < 5 line solutions. Here is one -

public String reverseWords(String s) {
    String[] words = s.trim().split(" +");
    Collections.reverse(Arrays.asList(words));
    return String.join(" ", words);
}

pretty fucking sad you have to make shit up and build a strawman because you hate Java this much.

>>59985489
>>59985975
>>59980239

B T F O

>>59979761
Forced use of feature like exceptions
C++'s operator overloading is comfy