What are some quality email providers that are secure and don't

>>59979304
Just pay for fastmail

ProtonMail.

How many times do I have to post this? Every fucking day we have this thread.

>>>/g/sqt

>>59979322
Is Fastmil good? I'm willing to pay for a quality email provider.

Autistici has good domains. The only hard part about autistici is getting in.

Here's the script I use when making an account:

1) Be on Tor Browser
2) Claim to be member of Anti-Capitalist / Gender Equality / Generally SJW group
3) Claim you need the e-mail to stay in touch with """""""""""""""""comrades"""""""""""""""""""
4) Get in

As for Riseup, just use private tracker forums to make two accounts over the Tor browser and then start duping. If you dupe enough accounts you can actually sell them in bulk on hackforums. Make sure you don't dupe *too* much though, otherwise you'll get nuked.

>>59979350
I found it to be good, it's never down and paying for it ensures they won't use me for ad revenue. What are you looking for in an email?

>>59979382
Security and reliability, and the ability to get a username that's actually decent unlike major providers like gmail where everything is taken.

Fastmail seems to be good for that. The username I'd like is available.

privacytoolsio.github.io

>>59979413
I've been using FastMail for over three years; it's quite good in security, UI, and uptime. I think the guardian project semi-approves of it too.

File: she.png (165KB, 599x480px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 599x480px

>she

>>59979349
Turns out protonmail requires nonfree JavaScript and doesn't support IMAP and SMTP, so it's impossible to use it with only free software.

>>59979304
check this out: https://gmail.com