How cutting edge are you?

why would you use canary? are you actively reporting bugs, or do you just not do anything in your browser that would matter if it crashed?

>>59965209
Same question.
Why would you use pre-build nonstable version of software, if not for testing?
There are no killer features in there to be found, 99% of the time , just an endless stream of minor bugs.

File: file.png (2KB, 431x135px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 431x135px

>>59965177

>>59965249
m8 I'm bleeding edge

>>59965209
>>59965241
Why not? Enjoy being out of date.

>>59965177
> bragging about running the latest botnet beta

Let us know when they test taking down NK's power grid on you, ok anon?

>>59965272
I don't have time to test every single piece of software, I just want to get shit done without having to tweak and fix an unreliable product every 30 minutes.
I enjoy using "nonstable" versions of software in my spare time, especially if they contain some kewl, but unpolished new functions.
But for work you almost always have to pick the most stable version of any given instrument.

>>59965177
>How cutting edge are you?
one might say that Im bleeding

>>59965177
>beta testing proprietary botnets
Nigger cattle detected.

>>59965209
For me personally, I don't do anything on the browser that matters if it crashes.

I just don't use chrome that much anyway.

>>59965275
>>59966091
samefag detected

>>59965177
I'm using Arch linux Testing, r8 me

>>59965209
>implying the current chrome versions doesn't crash often